NCT03342560

Brief Summary

Chronic liver disease is a major problem in the general population and there is an unmet need to diagnose(and screen) for liver disease with using noninvasive, cost-effective and sensitive techniques.The investigators hypothesize that variation using ultrasound elastography for the estimation of stage of liver fibrosis and steatosis in patients with diffuse liver disease exists due to different methods of measurements, and/or different systems. The proposed investigation is a cross-sectional study using ultrasound elastography and fat quantification modalities. The investigators are planning to enroll 30 subjects 18 years old and older in whom diffuse liver disease is suspected, and who have undergone non-focal liver biopsy in the past 6 months or are scheduled to undergo biopsy within 3 months of enrollment, as part of their routine clinical care. The investigators will use 4 different ultrasound devices with their shear wave elastography and speed of sound functions. Specific aims;

  • Compare shear wave elastography(SWE) measurements from different ultrasound systems; using histopathology as reference standards.
  • Assess intra-operator and inter-operator reliability by measuring variability in elastography values by two operators on a single system.
  • Determine the effect of deviations from guidelines(less number of measurements and measurements during active breath)

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 29, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 6, 2017

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 17, 2017

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 14, 2018

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 30, 2018

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 28, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 28, 2019

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

November 6, 2017

Results QC Date

August 27, 2019

Last Update Submit

October 5, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Liver FibrosisUltrasound ElastographyShear wave speedStiffnessLiver Biopsy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Deviations From Suggested Guidelines- Any Effect on Agreement

    We collected guideline suggested shear wave elastography measurements from 20 patients. Guidelines suggest collecting 1) 10 measurements, 2) Asking patient to hold breath during the measurements. As a deviation from guideline suggestions, we collected measurements during free breath movements without asking patient to hold breath. As a deviation from the guideline suggestions, fewer number of measurements (3 measurements) were collected with asking the patient to hold breath during the measurements. All measurements were collected using one type of ultrasound system. All measurements were collected by 2 operators in 2 visits.

    Visit 1 and Visit 2, an average of 2.5 hours for each visit

  • Interoperator and Intraoperator Agreement in m/s and kPA Units

    In 20 patients we collected 10 shear wave elastography measurements in m/s and kPA units. Using one of the available ultrasound systems, 2 operators collected these measurements in 2 visits. Theoretically, m/s to kPA conversion can be made using an equation. However, some systems provide opportunity to get data in both units. Although algebraically m/s and kPA can be converted to each other, we found some minor differences in terms of inter-operator and intra-operator agreement.

    Visit 1 and Visit 2, an average of 2.5 hours for each visit

Study Arms (1)

30 Patients with known liver biopsy results

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients with chronic liver disease with known biopsy results

Device: Sonographic SWE measurements with 4 different ultrasound systems

Interventions

Sonographic Shear wave elastography will be performed to quantify liver fibrosis

30 Patients with known liver biopsy results

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult Patients
  • Men or Woman
  • Suspected diffuse liver disease and have had a liver biopsy within the last 6 months or are scheduled for a liver biopsy in the next 3 months.
  • Consent to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy
  • Acute illness/ cognitive impairment resulting in inability to cooperate with ultrasound
  • Patients that do not consent to ultrasound examination

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

Related Publications (30)

  • Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Afendy M, Fang Y, Younossi Y, Mir H, Srishord M. Changes in the prevalence of the most common causes of chronic liver diseases in the United States from 1988 to 2008. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jun;9(6):524-530.e1; quiz e60. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.03.020. Epub 2011 Mar 25.

    PMID: 21440669BACKGROUND
  • Mokdad AA, Lopez AD, Shahraz S, Lozano R, Mokdad AH, Stanaway J, Murray CJ, Naghavi M. Liver cirrhosis mortality in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. BMC Med. 2014 Sep 18;12:145. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0145-y.

    PMID: 25242656BACKGROUND
  • Pinzani M, Rombouts K. Liver fibrosis: from the bench to clinical targets. Dig Liver Dis. 2004 Apr;36(4):231-42. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2004.01.003.

    PMID: 15115333BACKGROUND
  • Scholmerich J, Holstege A. Aetiology and pathophysiology of chronic liver disorders. Drugs. 1990;40 Suppl 3:3-22. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199000403-00003.

    PMID: 2081479BACKGROUND
  • Pellicoro A, Ramachandran P, Iredale JP, Fallowfield JA. Liver fibrosis and repair: immune regulation of wound healing in a solid organ. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014 Mar;14(3):181-94. doi: 10.1038/nri3623.

    PMID: 24566915BACKGROUND
  • Actis GC, Olivero A, Lagget M, Pellicano R, Smedile A, Rizzetto M. The practice of percutaneous liver biopsy in a gastrohepatology day hospital: a retrospective study on 835 biopsies. Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Oct;52(10):2576-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9724-x. Epub 2007 Apr 12.

    PMID: 17436094BACKGROUND
  • Cadranel JF, Rufat P, Degos F. Practices of liver biopsy in France: results of a prospective nationwide survey. For the Group of Epidemiology of the French Association for the Study of the Liver (AFEF). Hepatology. 2000 Sep;32(3):477-81. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2000.16602.

    PMID: 10960438BACKGROUND
  • van der Poorten D, Kwok A, Lam T, Ridley L, Jones DB, Ngu MC, Lee AU. Twenty-year audit of percutaneous liver biopsy in a major Australian teaching hospital. Intern Med J. 2006 Nov;36(11):692-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01216.x.

    PMID: 17040353BACKGROUND
  • Sparchez Z. Complications after percutaneous liver biopsy in diffuse hepatopathies. Rom J Gastroenterol. 2005 Dec;14(4):379-84.

    PMID: 16400355BACKGROUND
  • Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S. Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med. 2001 Feb 15;344(7):495-500. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102153440706. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11172192BACKGROUND
  • Rousselet MC, Michalak S, Dupre F, Croue A, Bedossa P, Saint-Andre JP, Cales P; Hepatitis Network 49. Sources of variability in histological scoring of chronic viral hepatitis. Hepatology. 2005 Feb;41(2):257-64. doi: 10.1002/hep.20535.

    PMID: 15660389BACKGROUND
  • Regev A, Berho M, Jeffers LJ, Milikowski C, Molina EG, Pyrsopoulos NT, Feng ZZ, Reddy KR, Schiff ER. Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Oct;97(10):2614-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.06038.x.

    PMID: 12385448BACKGROUND
  • Bedossa P, Dargere D, Paradis V. Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003 Dec;38(6):1449-57. doi: 10.1016/j.hep.2003.09.022.

    PMID: 14647056BACKGROUND
  • Friedrich-Rust M, Buggisch P, de Knegt RJ, Dries V, Shi Y, Matschenz K, Schneider MD, Herrmann E, Petersen J, Schulze F, Zeuzem S, Sarrazin C. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 2013 Apr;20(4):240-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2012.01646.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

    PMID: 23490368BACKGROUND
  • Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C, Andronescu D, Usvat R, Cretoiu D, Baicus C, Marinoschi G. Acoustic radiation force imaging sonoelastography for noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov 28;15(44):5525-32. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5525.

    PMID: 19938190BACKGROUND
  • Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Dal Bello B, Zicchetti M, Filice G, Filice C; Liver Fibrosis Study Group. Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: a pilot study. Hepatology. 2012 Dec;56(6):2125-33. doi: 10.1002/hep.25936. Epub 2012 Aug 31.

    PMID: 22767302BACKGROUND
  • Poynard T, Munteanu M, Luckina E, Perazzo H, Ngo Y, Royer L, Fedchuk L, Sattonnet F, Pais R, Lebray P, Rudler M, Thabut D, Ratziu V. Liver fibrosis evaluation using real-time shear wave elastography: applicability and diagnostic performance using methods without a gold standard. J Hepatol. 2013 May;58(5):928-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.12.021. Epub 2013 Jan 12.

    PMID: 23321316BACKGROUND
  • Chen S, Sanchez W, Callstrom MR, Gorman B, Lewis JT, Sanderson SO, Greenleaf JF, Xie H, Shi Y, Pashley M, Shamdasani V, Lachman M, Metz S. Assessment of liver viscoelasticity by using shear waves induced by ultrasound radiation force. Radiology. 2013 Mar;266(3):964-70. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120837. Epub 2012 Dec 6.

    PMID: 23220900BACKGROUND
  • Goertz RS, Zopf Y, Jugl V, Heide R, Janson C, Strobel D, Bernatik T, Haendl T. Measurement of liver elasticity with acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology: an alternative noninvasive method for staging liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis. Ultraschall Med. 2010 Apr;31(2):151-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245244. Epub 2010 Mar 19.

    PMID: 20306380BACKGROUND
  • Takahashi H, Ono N, Eguchi Y, Eguchi T, Kitajima Y, Kawaguchi Y, Nakashita S, Ozaki I, Mizuta T, Toda S, Kudo S, Miyoshi A, Miyazaki K, Fujimoto K. Evaluation of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for fibrosis staging of chronic liver disease: a pilot study. Liver Int. 2010 Apr;30(4):538-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02130.x. Epub 2009 Oct 27.

    PMID: 19874490BACKGROUND
  • Friedrich-Rust M, Wunder K, Kriener S, Sotoudeh F, Richter S, Bojunga J, Herrmann E, Poynard T, Dietrich CF, Vermehren J, Zeuzem S, Sarrazin C. Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis: noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versus transient elastography. Radiology. 2009 Aug;252(2):595-604. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2523081928.

    PMID: 19703889BACKGROUND
  • Wang QB, Zhu H, Liu HL, Zhang B. Performance of magnetic resonance elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging for the staging of hepatic fibrosis: A meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2012 Jul;56(1):239-47. doi: 10.1002/hep.25610. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

    PMID: 22278368BACKGROUND
  • Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, Sola R, Correa MC, Montaner J, S Sulkowski M, Torriani FJ, Dieterich DT, Thomas DL, Messinger D, Nelson M; APRICOT Clinical Investigators. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology. 2006 Jun;43(6):1317-25. doi: 10.1002/hep.21178.

    PMID: 16729309BACKGROUND
  • Cales P, Oberti F, Michalak S, Hubert-Fouchard I, Rousselet MC, Konate A, Gallois Y, Ternisien C, Chevailler A, Lunel F. A novel panel of blood markers to assess the degree of liver fibrosis. Hepatology. 2005 Dec;42(6):1373-81. doi: 10.1002/hep.20935.

    PMID: 16317693BACKGROUND
  • Adams LA, Bulsara M, Rossi E, DeBoer B, Speers D, George J, Kench J, Farrell G, McCaughan GW, Jeffrey GP. Hepascore: an accurate validated predictor of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C infection. Clin Chem. 2005 Oct;51(10):1867-73. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.048389. Epub 2005 Jul 28.

    PMID: 16055434BACKGROUND
  • Forns X, Ampurdanes S, Llovet JM, Aponte J, Quinto L, Martinez-Bauer E, Bruguera M, Sanchez-Tapias JM, Rodes J. Identification of chronic hepatitis C patients without hepatic fibrosis by a simple predictive model. Hepatology. 2002 Oct;36(4 Pt 1):986-92. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.36128.

    PMID: 12297848BACKGROUND
  • Crespo G, Fernandez-Varo G, Marino Z, Casals G, Miquel R, Martinez SM, Gilabert R, Forns X, Jimenez W, Navasa M. ARFI, FibroScan, ELF, and their combinations in the assessment of liver fibrosis: a prospective study. J Hepatol. 2012 Aug;57(2):281-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.03.016. Epub 2012 Apr 17.

    PMID: 22521355BACKGROUND
  • Rosenberg WM, Voelker M, Thiel R, Becka M, Burt A, Schuppan D, Hubscher S, Roskams T, Pinzani M, Arthur MJ; European Liver Fibrosis Group. Serum markers detect the presence of liver fibrosis: a cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2004 Dec;127(6):1704-13. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.08.052.

    PMID: 15578508BACKGROUND
  • Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, Kalbfleisch JD, Marrero JA, Conjeevaram HS, Lok AS. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003 Aug;38(2):518-26. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50346.

    PMID: 12883497BACKGROUND
  • Imbert-Bismut F, Ratziu V, Pieroni L, Charlotte F, Benhamou Y, Poynard T; MULTIVIRC Group. Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C virus infection: a prospective study. Lancet. 2001 Apr 7;357(9262):1069-75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04258-6.

    PMID: 11297957BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Liver CirrhosisLiver Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System DiseasesFibrosisPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

* Reference standard (biopsy) was collected from medical records. Pathology slides were not re-evaluated. * Low number of patients to perform diagnostic performance analysis

Results Point of Contact

Title
Anthony E. Samir
Organization
Massachusetts General Hospital

Study Officials

  • Anthony E. Samir, MD, MPH

    Associate Medical Director, Ultrasound Imaging Services

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Service Chief,Body Ultrasound Department of Radiology, Assistant Professor at Harvard Medical School

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2017

First Posted

November 17, 2017

Study Start

June 29, 2017

Primary Completion

August 14, 2018

Study Completion

August 30, 2018

Last Updated

October 28, 2019

Results First Posted

October 28, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations