Intelligent Electric Bicycle for Health (VELIS) to Optimize the Return to Physical Activity for Oncology Patients
Evaluation of the Use of an Intelligent Electric Bicycle for Health (VELIS) to Optimize the Return to Physical Activity After a Stay for Effort Retraining in Rehabilitation and Recuperative Care Facilities for Oncology Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
14
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this pilot study is to encourage oncology patients to continue effort retraining after their release from rehabilitation and recuperative care facilities with physical activity sessions and therapeutic education using an intelligent electric bicycle (VELIS)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable cancer
Started Oct 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 9, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2018
CompletedFebruary 5, 2020
February 1, 2020
1.1 years
September 27, 2017
February 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of patients reaching the goal of 150 min equivalent of moderate physical activity per week (600 MET-min/week)
Evaluated with the IPAQ questionnaire short version (International Physical Activity Questionnaire)
4 Months
Secondary Outcomes (27)
Quantitative analysis of kinetic physical activity evolution
Enrollment and then once a month from Month 2 to Month 4, the last week of the month, velis sessions and effort retraining excluded
Evaluate the VELIS sessions feasibility n°1
4 Months
Evaluate the VELIS sessions feasibility n°2
4 Months
Evaluate the VELIS sessions feasibility n°3
4 Months
Evaluate the impact on the physical capacities n°1
4 Months
- +22 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Intelligent electric bicycle (VELIS) sessions
EXPERIMENTALIntelligent electric bicycle (VELIS) sessions with an instructor, twice a week for 6 weeks
Interventions
Oncology patients will participate in intelligent electric bicycle (VELIS) sessions twice a week for 6 weeks after their release from a rehabilitation and recuperative care facility
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient aged 18 and over
- Patient who has followed a post-cancer effort retraining program in a rehabilitation facility at Rocheplane Medical Center
- Patient with the ability to pedal on an outdoor bicycle
- Patient with no restriction to moderate physical activity or bicycling (acute coronary disease of less than 2 years, locomotor problem of the spine or lower limbs incompatible with the practice of cycling)
- Weight less than 125 kg (maximum load for VELIS)
- Patient available for a 4 months follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with a restriction to the practice of moderate physical activity or bicycle (acute coronary disease of less than 2 years, locomotor problem)
- Persons referred to in Articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the CSP (corresponds to all protected persons), pregnant, parturient, nursing mother, person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, a legal protection measure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fondation Audavielead
- Floraliscollaborator
- eBikeLabscollaborator
- Rocheplane Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Rocheplane Medical Center
Saint-Martin-d'Hères, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 38400, France
Related Publications (11)
Phillips SM, Alfano CM, Perna FM, Glasgow RE. Accelerating translation of physical activity and cancer survivorship research into practice: recommendations for a more integrated and collaborative approach. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 May;23(5):687-99. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1355. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
PMID: 24599577BACKGROUNDHaskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Macera CA, Heath GW, Thompson PD, Bauman A; American College of Sports Medicine; American Heart Association. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007 Aug 28;116(9):1081-93. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185649. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
PMID: 17671237BACKGROUNDNelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC, Macera CA, Castaneda-Sceppa C. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Aug;39(8):1435-45. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616aa2.
PMID: 17762378BACKGROUNDMielgo-Ayuso J, Aparicio-Ugarriza R, Castillo A, Ruiz E, Avila JM, Aranceta-Batrina J, Gil A, Ortega RM, Serra-Majem L, Varela-Moreiras G, Gonzalez-Gross M. Physical Activity Patterns of the Spanish Population Are Mostly Determined by Sex and Age: Findings in the ANIBES Study. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0149969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149969. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 26914609BACKGROUNDPavey TG, Anokye N, Taylor AH, Trueman P, Moxham T, Fox KR, Hillsdon M, Green C, Campbell JL, Foster C, Mutrie N, Searle J, Taylor RS. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2011 Dec;15(44):i-xii, 1-254. doi: 10.3310/hta15440.
PMID: 22182828BACKGROUNDWelker J, Cornuz J, Gojanovic B. [Electrically assisted bicycles: health enhancement or "green" gadget?]. Rev Med Suisse. 2012 Jul 25;8(349):1513-7. French.
PMID: 22913003BACKGROUNDPeterman JE, Morris KL, Kram R, Byrnes WC. Pedelecs as a physically active transportation mode. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Aug;116(8):1565-73. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3408-9. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
PMID: 27299435BACKGROUNDGojanovic B, Welker J, Iglesias K, Daucourt C, Gremion G. Electric bicycles as a new active transportation modality to promote health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Nov;43(11):2204-10. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821cbdc8.
PMID: 22005715BACKGROUNDSimons M, Van Es E, Hendriksen I. Electrically assisted cycling: a new mode for meeting physical activity guidelines? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Nov;41(11):2097-102. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a6aaa4.
PMID: 19812505BACKGROUNDFalzon C, Sabiston C, Bergamaschi A, Corrion K, Chalabaev A, D'Arripe-Longueville F. Development and validation of the Cancer Exercise Stereotypes Scale. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2014;32(6):708-26. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2014.955237.
PMID: 25174265BACKGROUNDPiper BF, Dibble SL, Dodd MJ, Weiss MC, Slaughter RE, Paul SM. The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998 May;25(4):677-84.
PMID: 9599351BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jean-Luc Bosson, MD
Laboratoire TIMC - Themas
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2017
First Posted
November 14, 2017
Study Start
October 9, 2017
Primary Completion
October 30, 2018
Study Completion
December 30, 2018
Last Updated
February 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02