Incentives and Glucose Adherence in Diabetes
Incentive Models on Testing Adherence for Women With Diabetes During Pregnancy
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Diabetes in pregnancy carries significant pregnancy specific risks and requires frequent glucose monitoring to reduce these risks. This project compares the effect of two incentive schemes on adherence rates of glucose testing in pregnancy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 5, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 26, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 9, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 30, 2025
CompletedJuly 30, 2025
July 1, 2025
3.6 years
October 26, 2017
June 16, 2022
July 10, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Frequency of Glucose Monitoring
Patients with type 1 diabetes were advised to monitor glucose seven times daily (fasting, 1hour post breakfast, pre- lunch, 1 hour post lunch, pre-dinner and 1 hour post dinner and nightly). Patients with type 2 and gestational diabetes were advised to have four glucose tests daily (fasting and 1hour post breakfast, lunch and dinner). Adherence to glucose testing was determined by the number of tests daily divided by the # of recommended tests daily and averaged over the course of the study as previously described
Pregnancy
Study Arms (3)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control arm will receive compensation at time of enrollment for agreeing to participate.
Positive Incentive
EXPERIMENTALThe positive incentive arm will receive compensation per prescribed test, payable every month based on testing adherence.
Loss Aversion
EXPERIMENTALThe loss aversion arm will have compensation deposited into a University of Iowa Women's Health account. The participant will then "lose" compensation depending on actual adherence to recommended testing
Interventions
Fixed compensation is offered to patients and they can earn a range of compensation at the completion of pregnancy depending on overall glucose testing adherence
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- pregnant women with insulin dependent diabetes prior to 29 weeks gestation.
You may not qualify if:
- incarcerated, not English speaking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52246, United States
Related Publications (10)
Wernimont SA, Sheng JS, Tymkowicz A, Fleener DK, Summers KM, Syrop CH, Andrews JI. Adherence to self-glucose monitoring recommendations and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019 Aug;1(3):100031. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100031. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
PMID: 33345801BACKGROUNDHomko CJ, Reece EA. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in gestational diabetes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002 Dec;12(6):389-95. doi: 10.1080/jmf.12.6.389.395.
PMID: 12683649BACKGROUNDde Veciana M, Major CA, Morgan MA, Asrat T, Toohey JS, Lien JM, Evans AT. Postprandial versus preprandial blood glucose monitoring in women with gestational diabetes mellitus requiring insulin therapy. N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov 9;333(19):1237-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199511093331901.
PMID: 7565999BACKGROUNDHalpern SD, French B, Small DS, Saulsgiver K, Harhay MO, Audrain-McGovern J, Loewenstein G, Brennan TA, Asch DA, Volpp KG. Randomized trial of four financial-incentive programs for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 28;372(22):2108-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414293. Epub 2015 May 13.
PMID: 25970009BACKGROUNDSen AP, Sewell TB, Riley EB, Stearman B, Bellamy SL, Hu MF, Tao Y, Zhu J, Park JD, Loewenstein G, Asch DA, Volpp KG. Financial incentives for home-based health monitoring: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 May;29(5):770-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2778-0. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
PMID: 24522623BACKGROUNDYee LM, McGuire JM, Taylor SM, Niznik CM, Simon MA. "I Was Tired of All the Sticking and Poking": Identifying Barriers to Diabetes Self-Care Among Low-Income Pregnant Women. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 Aug;26(3):926-40. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0073.
PMID: 26320923BACKGROUNDHiggins ST, Washio Y, Heil SH, Solomon LJ, Gaalema DE, Higgins TM, Bernstein IM. Financial incentives for smoking cessation among pregnant and newly postpartum women. Prev Med. 2012 Nov;55 Suppl(Suppl):S33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.12.016. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
PMID: 22227223BACKGROUNDCosson E, Baz B, Gary F, Pharisien I, Nguyen MT, Sandre-Banon D, Jaber Y, Cussac-Pillegand C, Banu I, Carbillon L, Valensi P. Poor Reliability and Poor Adherence to Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Are Common in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and May Be Associated With Poor Pregnancy Outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2017 Sep;40(9):1181-1186. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0369. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
PMID: 28724718BACKGROUNDTappin D, Bauld L, Purves D, Boyd K, Sinclair L, MacAskill S, McKell J, Friel B, McConnachie A, de Caestecker L, Tannahill C, Radley A, Coleman T; Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial Team. Financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2015 Jan 27;350:h134. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h134.
PMID: 25627664BACKGROUNDWernimont SA, Fleener D, Summers KM, Deonovic B, Syrop CH, Andrews JI. The Effect of Financial Incentives on Adherence to Glucose Self-Monitoring during Pregnancy among Patients with Insulin-Requiring Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e259-e266. doi: 10.1055/a-1889-7765. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
PMID: 35777732DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sarah A. Wernimont MD, PhD
- Organization
- University of Minnesota
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Janet Andrews, MD
University of Iowa
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 26, 2017
First Posted
November 9, 2017
Study Start
May 5, 2016
Primary Completion
December 18, 2019
Study Completion
June 30, 2022
Last Updated
July 30, 2025
Results First Posted
July 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share