A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of FICare At 18 Months
Child Developmental Health, Maternal Psychosocial Distress, and Health System Costs At 18 Months Corrected Age: Effectiveness of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Family Integrated Care in Level II NICUs
1 other identifier
interventional
297
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In Alberta, one in every twelve babies is born preterm. Compared with their full term counterparts, preterm infants who survive are at higher risk for respiratory problems, jaundice, infections, feeding problems, behavioural problems, and neuro-developmental disabilities, including cognitive delays, and visual and hearing impairments. As a result, parents must leave their preterm babies in the hospital to fully develop enough to care for them at home. When it is time for discharge, parents are often unprepared to look after their baby because they may have limited involvement in the care of their baby in hospital. In addition to the distress and costs to parents of having a baby in hospital, health system costs are also increased the longer a baby is in hospital. The aim of this novel health services study is to assess the longer-term outcomes and costs, to 18 months corrected age, of Family Integrated Care (FICare) for moderate and late preterm infants admitted to a Level II neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). A cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) of FICare is currently in progress. FICare is a psycho-educational intervention that empowers parents (mothers and fathers) to sequentially build their knowledge, skill, and confidence so the family is well-prepared to care for their preterm infant before discharge. The FICare cRCT evaluates outcomes related to infant global development and maternal psychosocial distress at 2 months. At 2 months, it is difficult to predict longer term outcomes for moderate and late preterm infants. A follow-up study at 18 months will provide evidence of the sustainability of any effects, and longer-term cost savings upon which to inform policy decisions about full-scale implementation of FICare in Level II NICUs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 9, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 26, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 26, 2020
CompletedDecember 11, 2024
November 1, 2020
2.5 years
October 23, 2017
December 6, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Global development
Ages and Stages Questionnaire, 3rd edition
At 18-months corrected age
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Infant social and emotional development
At 18-months corrected age
Number of emergency room visits
At 18-months corrected age
Number of re-admissions to hospital
At 18-months corrected age
Number of unplanned visits to physician or other provider
At 18-months corrected age
Number of antibiotic prescriptions
At 18-months corrected age
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
FICare Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALStudy participants received Family Integrated Care (intervention) while their infant(s) was/were admitted to a Level II NICU.
FICare Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONStudy participants received standard care while their infant(s) was/were admitted to a Level II NICU.
Interventions
FICare is a dynamic psycho-educational intervention. The goal of FICare is a change in culture and practice that permits, encourages and supports parents in their parenting role while their infant is receiving health care in a Level II NICU. Underpinned by adult learning and change theories, FICare empowers parents to build their knowledge, skill and confidence so that the family is well-prepared to care for their infant long before discharge.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mothers of infants born between 32 weeks and zero days and 34 weeks and 6 days gestation who enrolled in the FICare Alberta Level II NICU cluster controlled trial (cRCT). The FICare cRCT enrolled mothers of any age who have decision making capacity; mothers who are able to speak, read and understand English well enough to provide informed consent, and complete surveys online or via telephone.
You may not qualify if:
- The FICare Alberta Level II NICU cRCT excluded mothers whose infants have serious congenital or chromosomal anomalies that require surgery, or are receiving palliative care; mothers who are not able to communicate in English; mothers with complex social issues.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Calgarylead
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)collaborator
- University of Torontocollaborator
- University of Albertacollaborator
- Alberta Health servicescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N1N4, Canada
Related Publications (53)
O'Brien K, Bracht M, Macdonell K, McBride T, Robson K, O'Leary L, Christie K, Galarza M, Dicky T, Levin A, Lee SK. A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S12. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
PMID: 23445639BACKGROUNDBenzies KM. Relational Communications Strategies to Support Family-Centered Neonatal Intensive Care. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2016 Jul-Sep;30(3):233-6. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000195.
PMID: 27465456BACKGROUNDBrown J, Ritchie JA. Nurses' perceptions of parent and nurse roles in caring for hospitalized children. Child Health Care. 1990 Winter;19(1):28-36. doi: 10.1207/s15326888chc1901_4.
PMID: 10106396BACKGROUNDMento G, Nosarti C. The case of late preterm birth: sliding forwards the critical window for cognitive outcome risk. Transl Pediatr. 2015 Jul;4(3):214-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-4336.2015.06.02.
PMID: 26835378BACKGROUNDHack M, Wilson-Costello D. Follow-up outcomes of high risk infants. In: Buonocore G, Bracci R, Weindling M, eds. Neonatology: A practical approach to neonatal diseases: Springer; 2012:122-129.
BACKGROUNDMarch of Dimes, PMNCH, Save the Children, WHO. Born too soon: The global action report on preterm birth. Geneva: World Health Organization;2012.
BACKGROUNDWorld Health Organization. Preterm birth fact sheet. 2015; www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs363/en.
BACKGROUNDAlberta Health and Wellness. Interactive Health Data Application, 2015 reproductive health data set. 2015; www.ahw.gov.ab.ca/IHDA_Retrieval/selectSubCategoryParameters.do#.
BACKGROUNDCanadian Institute for Health Information. Highlights of 2010-2011 selected indicators describing the birthing process in Canada. Canadian Institute for Health Information;2012.
BACKGROUNDTough SC, Newburn-Cook C, Johnston DW, Svenson LW, Rose S, Belik J. Delayed childbearing and its impact on population rate changes in lower birth weight, multiple birth, and preterm delivery. Pediatrics. 2002 Mar;109(3):399-403. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.3.399.
PMID: 11875131BACKGROUNDTough S, Tofflemire K, Newburn-Cook C, Fraser-Lee N, Benzies K. Increased risks of pregnancy complications and adverse infant outcomes associated with assisted reproduction. International Congress Series. Research Papers in Fertility and Reproductive Medicine. Proceedings of the 18th World Congress on Fertility and Sterility (IFFS 2004). 2004;1271:376-379.
BACKGROUNDKerstjens JM, de Winter AF, Bocca-Tjeertes IF, Bos AF, Reijneveld SA. Risk of developmental delay increases exponentially as gestational age of preterm infants decreases: a cohort study at age 4 years. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012 Dec;54(12):1096-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04423.x. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
PMID: 23020259BACKGROUNDTomashek KM, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Davidoff MJ, Petrini JR. Differences in mortality between late-preterm and term singleton infants in the United States, 1995-2002. J Pediatr. 2007 Nov;151(5):450-6, 456.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.05.002. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
PMID: 17961684BACKGROUNDSun Y, Hsu P, Vestergaard M, Christensen J, Li J, Olsen J. Gestational age, birth weight, and risk for injuries in childhood. Epidemiology. 2010 Sep;21(5):650-7. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e94253.
PMID: 20585254BACKGROUNDSchonhaut L, Armijo I, Perez M. Gestational age and developmental risk in moderately and late preterm and early term infants. Pediatrics. 2015 Apr;135(4):e835-41. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1957. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
PMID: 25733752BACKGROUNDEngle WA; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Age terminology during the perinatal period. Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):1362-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1915.
PMID: 15520122BACKGROUNDHarijan P, Boyle EM. Health outcomes in infancy and childhood of moderate and late preterm infants. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Jun;17(3):159-62. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
PMID: 22417643BACKGROUNDBaron IS, Litman FR, Ahronovich MD, Baker R. Late preterm birth: a review of medical and neuropsychological childhood outcomes. Neuropsychol Rev. 2012 Dec;22(4):438-50. doi: 10.1007/s11065-012-9210-5. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
PMID: 22869055BACKGROUNDMcGowan JE, Alderdice FA, Holmes VA, Johnston L. Early childhood development of late-preterm infants: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2011 Jun;127(6):1111-24. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2257. Epub 2011 May 29.
PMID: 21624885BACKGROUNDJohnson S, Evans TA, Draper ES, Field DJ, Manktelow BN, Marlow N, Matthews R, Petrou S, Seaton SE, Smith LK, Boyle EM. Neurodevelopmental outcomes following late and moderate prematurity: a population-based cohort study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 Jul;100(4):F301-8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307684. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
PMID: 25834170BACKGROUNDGuy A, Seaton SE, Boyle EM, Draper ES, Field DJ, Manktelow BN, Marlow N, Smith LK, Johnson S. Infants born late/moderately preterm are at increased risk for a positive autism screen at 2 years of age. J Pediatr. 2015 Feb;166(2):269-75.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.10.053. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
PMID: 25477165BACKGROUNDKerstjens JM, de Winter AF, Bocca-Tjeertes IF, ten Vergert EM, Reijneveld SA, Bos AF. Developmental delay in moderately preterm-born children at school entry. J Pediatr. 2011 Jul;159(1):92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.12.041. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
PMID: 21324481BACKGROUNDBallantyne M, Benzies KM, McDonald S, Magill-Evans J, Tough S. Risk of developmental delay: Comparison of late preterm and full term Canadian infants at age 12 months. Early Hum Dev. 2016 Oct;101:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
PMID: 27405053BACKGROUNDStene-Larsen K, Brandlistuen RE, Lang AM, Landolt MA, Latal B, Vollrath ME. Communication impairments in early term and late preterm children: a prospective cohort study following children to age 36 months. J Pediatr. 2014 Dec;165(6):1123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.08.027. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
PMID: 25258153BACKGROUNDChan E, Quigley MA. School performance at age 7 years in late preterm and early term birth: a cohort study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014 Nov;99(6):F451-7. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306124. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
PMID: 24966128BACKGROUNDde Jong M, Verhoeven M, van Baar AL. School outcome, cognitive functioning, and behaviour problems in moderate and late preterm children and adults: a review. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Jun;17(3):163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
PMID: 22364677BACKGROUNDvan Baar AL, Vermaas J, Knots E, de Kleine MJ, Soons P. Functioning at school age of moderately preterm children born at 32 to 36 weeks' gestational age. Pediatrics. 2009 Jul;124(1):251-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2315.
PMID: 19564307BACKGROUNDHornman J, de Winter AF, Kerstjens JM, Bos AF, Reijneveld SA. Emotional and Behavioral Problems of Preterm and Full-Term Children at School Entry. Pediatrics. 2016 May;137(5):e20152255. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2255.
PMID: 27244786BACKGROUNDPotijk MR, de Winter AF, Bos AF, Kerstjens JM, Reijneveld SA. Higher rates of behavioural and emotional problems at preschool age in children born moderately preterm. Arch Dis Child. 2012 Feb;97(2):112-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2011.300131. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
PMID: 22147746BACKGROUNDPotijk MR, de Winter AF, Bos AF, Kerstjens JM, Reijneveld SA. Co-occurrence of developmental and behavioural problems in moderate to late preterm-born children. Arch Dis Child. 2016 Mar;101(3):217-22. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308958. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
PMID: 26471109BACKGROUNDBlaggan S, Guy A, Boyle EM, Spata E, Manktelow BN, Wolke D, Johnson S. A parent questionnaire for developmental screening in infants born late and moderately preterm. Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e55-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0266.
PMID: 24982100BACKGROUNDJohnson S, Matthews R, Draper ES, Field DJ, Manktelow BN, Marlow N, Smith LK, Boyle EM. Early Emergence of Delayed Social Competence in Infants Born Late and Moderately Preterm. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(9):690-9. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000222.
PMID: 26461097BACKGROUNDDean S. Child Health Strategic Clinical Network meeting: Reporting and analytics. Calgary, AB: Alberta Health Services; 2012.
BACKGROUNDPetrou S, Khan K. Economic costs associated with moderate and late preterm birth: primary and secondary evidence. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Jun;17(3):170-8. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
PMID: 22364679BACKGROUNDBriggs-Gowan MJ, Carter AS, Irwin JR, Wachtel K, Cicchetti DV. The Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment: screening for social-emotional problems and delays in competence. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004 Mar;29(2):143-55. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsh017.
PMID: 15096535BACKGROUNDKolb B, Whishaw IQ, Teskey GC. An introduction to brain and behavior. New York, NY: Worth Publishers; 2016.
BACKGROUNDShulruf B, Morton S, Goodyear-Smith F, O'Loughlin C, Dixon R. Designing multidisciplinary longitudinal studies of human development: analyzing past research to inform methodology. Eval Health Prof. 2007 Sep;30(3):207-28. doi: 10.1177/0163278707304030.
PMID: 17693616BACKGROUNDScher MS, Johnson MW, Ludington SM, Loparo K. Physiologic brain dysmaturity in late preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 2011 Nov;70(5):524-8. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31822f24af.
PMID: 21796018BACKGROUNDSchwichtenberg AJ, Christ S, Abel E, Poehlmann-Tynan JA. Circadian Sleep Patterns in Toddlers Born Preterm: Longitudinal Associations with Developmental and Health Concerns. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2016 Jun;37(5):358-69. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000287.
PMID: 27011003BACKGROUNDBooker CL, Harding S, Benzeval M. A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies. BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 19;11:249. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-249.
PMID: 21504610BACKGROUNDSchwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Casual and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.
BACKGROUNDEaton WW, Muntaner C, Smith C, Tien A, Ybarra M. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: Review and revision (CESD and CESD-R). In: Maruish ME, ed. The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2004:363-377.
BACKGROUNDSadeh A, Mindell JA, Luedtke K, Wiegand B. Sleep and sleep ecology in the first 3 years: a web-based study. J Sleep Res. 2009 Mar;18(1):60-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00699.x. Epub 2008 Oct 16.
PMID: 19021850BACKGROUNDSadeh A. A brief screening questionnaire for infant sleep problems: validation and findings for an Internet sample. Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):e570-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.e570.
PMID: 15173539BACKGROUNDSadeh A, Mindell J, Rivera L. "My child has a sleep problem": a cross-cultural comparison of parental definitions. Sleep Med. 2011 May;12(5):478-82. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2010.10.008. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
PMID: 21478050BACKGROUNDRadloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurements, 1, 385-401.
BACKGROUNDTeng A, Bartle A, Sadeh A, Mindell J. Infant and toddler sleep in Australia and New Zealand. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Mar;48(3):268-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02251.x. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
PMID: 22107168BACKGROUNDMindell JA, Du Mond CE, Sadeh A, Telofski LS, Kulkarni N, Gunn E. Efficacy of an internet-based intervention for infant and toddler sleep disturbances. Sleep. 2011 Apr 1;34(4):451-8. doi: 10.1093/sleep/34.4.451.
PMID: 21461323BACKGROUNDCaro J, Erslev AJ. Uremic inhibitors of erythropoiesis. Semin Nephrol. 1985 Jun;5(2):128-32. No abstract available.
PMID: 3879951BACKGROUNDSpielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. Test manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970.
BACKGROUNDAbidin RR. Parenting Stress Index - Fourth Edition - Short Form. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2012.
BACKGROUNDEaton WW, Smith C, Ybarra M, Muntaner C, Tien A. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: Review and revision (CESD and CESD-R). In: Maruish ME, ed. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Volume 3 - Instruments for adults. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004:363-377.
BACKGROUNDSchwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, eds. Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor, UK: NEFR-NELSON; 1995:35-37.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abhay Lodha, MD
University of Calgary
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Khalid Aziz, MD
University of Alberta
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vibhuti Shah, MD
University of Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor; Associate Dean, Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2017
First Posted
November 9, 2017
Study Start
September 27, 2017
Primary Completion
March 26, 2020
Study Completion
March 26, 2020
Last Updated
December 11, 2024
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Discussions are underway to draft a data deposition agreement with Secondary Analyses to Generate Evidence (SAGE).