Study Stopped
Difficulties in recruiting
Effectiveness Ankle-7 Orthosis VS HAFO Orthosis on Gait in Diplegic CPChildren
Effectiveness of Ankle-7 Orthosis vs HAFO Orthosis on Gait Performance in Diplegic Cerebral Palsied Children
1 other identifier
interventional
10
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Ankle foot orthoses (AFO) are frequently used to improve locomotor skills of cerebral palsied children (CP) although the level of scientific evidence to support their use is still moderate. Carbon Ankle Seven spring (A7 - Otto Bock, Germany) is specifically designed to store energy when loaded and release it at toe-off in order to improve gait performance with respect to non-energy-storing AFOs. The aim of this work is to verify the superiority of the ankle-7 orthosis compared to the more widespread AFO, to improve the functionality and walking function of children with spastic diplegia and PCI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 30, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2017
CompletedJune 12, 2025
November 1, 2017
4.5 years
October 2, 2017
June 9, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from right and left ankle joints power generation in stance phase after the use of first orthosis to right and left ankle joints power generation in stance phase after the use of second orthosis
Measured by instrumental gait analysis (ratio of watt to kilogram)
After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis and after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis
Secondary Outcomes (5)
knee joint kinematics
After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis and after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis
stride length
After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis and after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis
walking speed
After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis and after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis
preference of use of AFO or Ankle_7
After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis, after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis and after 3 months after three months when the child could freely use both orthoses
clinical evaluation of the walking function
After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis and after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis
Study Arms (2)
AFO - Ankle_7 group
OTHERAFO is active comparator, ANKLE7 is the experimental treatment
Ankle-7 - AFO group
OTHERAFO is active comparator, ANKLE7 is the experimental treatment
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Clinical indication to the use of orthoses to improve the walking function confirmed by instrumental parameters obtained from analysis of the path (dynamic electromyography, optoelectronic stereophotogrammetry analysis);
- Patients who already have AFO orthoses (or ankle-7) that need to be renewed;
- Patients with new clinical indication to the use of orthoses but not yet in possession of the same;
- Informed consent from parents / guardians of the child
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive disabilities that may affect the child's participation in the activities related to this study, in the opinion of the investigators;
- Lower limbs sensory disability that may affect any beneficial effects of the use of the orthoses, in the opinion of the investigators;
- Other diseases associated or not associated with PCI that, according to investigators, could affect the child's participation in the activities related to this study (eg: drug-resistant epilepsy);
- Administration of antispasmodic drugs in the last 6 months;
- Functional surgery of the lower limbs in the last 6 months;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adriano Ferrari
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2017
First Posted
November 7, 2017
Study Start
November 30, 2012
Primary Completion
May 15, 2017
Study Completion
August 15, 2017
Last Updated
June 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2017-11