Determining the Necessity for Postoperative Antibiotics After Salivary Stent Placement
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Salivary duct stent placement is a common practice to maintain duct patency after salivary duct repair or interventional sialoendoscopy; procedures performed to manage salivary duct pathology such as stenosis, traumatic injury or most commonly salivary duct stones. It is common practice for patients to receive perioperative antibiotics while undergoing interventional sialoendoscopy and postoperative oral antibiotic therapy with Clindamycin or Augmentin for 10-14 days, if a short term (2 week) salivary duct stenting was considered necessary due to the nature of the intervention. However, In reviewing the literature, there are controversial trials that indicate post-operative antibiotics may not be best practice in all surgical scenarios, as the adverse events ie. gastrointestinal disturbances, nausea, Clostridium difficile (C.diff) infection and antibiotic resistance over time surrounding overuse of antibiotics may outweigh the clinical need for the antibiotic regiment and the chances of post-operative infection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jun 2018
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedNovember 1, 2023
October 1, 2023
6.6 years
October 20, 2017
October 31, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-operative infection
The primary endpoint will be the determination of clinical infection between the time points post-operation to the 2 week follow-up visit when the stent is removed as indicated by evidence of purulence or erythema at the surgical site, fever and elevated white blood cell count.
2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Group A (Antibiotic)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup A will receive postoperative oral antibiotics for 10 - 14 days (Clindamycin or Augmentin) upon discharge.
Group B (no Antibiotic)
NO INTERVENTIONGroup B will not be given postoperative oral antibiotics upon discharge.
Interventions
Patients will receive postoperative oral antibiotics (Clindamycin or Augmentin) for 10-14 days upon discharge.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All adult patients (18 years of age or older) who are undergoing salivary duct surgery and stent placement at Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are unwilling to consent to the study and/or to being placed in a randomized arm of either receiving post-operative antibiotics or not receiving post-operative antibiotics
- Patients with acute infections at the time of surgery
- Patients who are immunocompromised
- Patients who are recruited but then have early dislodgement of the stent
- Patients who do not complete their postoperative antibiotic therapy due to intolerance or antibiotic side effects. However, data on these patients will be recorded to provide an observational results that will support the need for this investigation on antibiotic use.
- Patients who are in the non-post operative antibiotic arm but choose to put themselves on antibiotics without consultation from the physician
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808, United States
Related Publications (11)
Lang MS, Gonzalez ML, Dodson TB. Do Antibiotics Decrease the Risk of Inflammatory Complications After Third Molar Removal in Community Practices? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Feb;75(2):249-255. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.09.044. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
PMID: 28341449BACKGROUNDTaub D, Yampolsky A, Diecidue R, Gold L. Controversies in the Management of Oral and Maxillofacial Infections. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2017 Nov;29(4):465-473. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
PMID: 28823889BACKGROUNDFleming-Dutra KE, Hersh AL, Shapiro DJ, Bartoces M, Enns EA, File TM Jr, Finkelstein JA, Gerber JS, Hyun DY, Linder JA, Lynfield R, Margolis DJ, May LS, Merenstein D, Metlay JP, Newland JG, Piccirillo JF, Roberts RM, Sanchez GV, Suda KJ, Thomas A, Woo TM, Zetts RM, Hicks LA. Prevalence of Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescriptions Among US Ambulatory Care Visits, 2010-2011. JAMA. 2016 May 3;315(17):1864-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4151.
PMID: 27139059BACKGROUNDDhiwakar M, Clement WA, Supriya M, McKerrow W. Antibiotics to reduce post-tonsillectomy morbidity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD005607. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005607.pub4.
PMID: 23235625BACKGROUNDAljfout Q, Alississ A, Rashdan H, Maita A, Saraireh M. Antibiotics for Post-Tonsillectomy Morbidity: Comparative Analysis of a Single Institutional Experience. J Clin Med Res. 2016 May;8(5):385-8. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2523w. Epub 2016 Mar 20.
PMID: 27081424BACKGROUNDSantana RS, Viana Ade C, Santiago Jda S, Menezes MS, Lobo IM, Marcellini PS. The cost of excessive postoperative use of antimicrobials: the context of a public hospital. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2014 May-Jun;41(3):149-54. doi: 10.1590/s0100-69912014000300003. English, Portuguese.
PMID: 25140644BACKGROUNDChen S, Le CH, Liang J. Practice patterns in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: survey of the American Rhinologic Society. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Sep;6(9):990-7. doi: 10.1002/alr.21759. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
PMID: 27060784BACKGROUNDAraujo da Silva AR, Albernaz de Almeida Dias DC, Marques AF, Biscaia di Biase C, Murni IK, Dramowski A, Sharland M, Huebner J, Zingg W. Role of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in children: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2018 Jun;99(2):117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
PMID: 28807835BACKGROUNDStultz JS, Doern CD, Godbout E. Antibiotic Resistance in Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2016 Dec;18(12):40. doi: 10.1007/s11908-016-0555-4.
PMID: 27761778BACKGROUNDPhuong NTK, Hoang TT, Van PH, Tu L, Graham SM, Marais BJ. Encouraging rational antibiotic use in childhood pneumonia: a focus on Vietnam and the Western Pacific Region. Pneumonia (Nathan). 2017 Apr 25;9:7. doi: 10.1186/s41479-017-0031-4. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28702309BACKGROUNDLinder JA. Editorial commentary: antibiotics for treatment of acute respiratory tract infections: decreasing benefit, increasing risk, and the irrelevance of antimicrobial resistance. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Sep 15;47(6):744-6. doi: 10.1086/591149. No abstract available.
PMID: 18694343BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rohan Walvekar, M.D.
Our Lady of the Lake Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2017
First Posted
November 6, 2017
Study Start
June 15, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
November 1, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share