NCT03331692

Brief Summary

Clinical monitoring is the most common method of adjustment of the appropriate level of general anesthesia. However, the episodes of intraoperative awareness are still reported, suggesting that clinical observations may not be sufficient in some cases. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of clinical and instrumental neuromonitoring with auditory evoked potentials in intraoperative analysis of the proper level of general anesthesia. The patients scheduled for elective surgery were included into the study, and randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the first group (TIVA group) underwent intravenous, in the second group (VA group) underwent volatile anesthesia. The adequacy of anesthesia was analyzed with standard clinical parameters. All the participants were instrumentally monitored with AAI index. After the anesthesia patients received a questionnaire with the questions regarding possible intraoperative awareness.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
208

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2012

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 20, 2012

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 30, 2013

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 14, 2014

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 29, 2017

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 6, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

November 6, 2017

Status Verified

October 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

October 29, 2017

Last Update Submit

November 2, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in AAI values in selected (16) time points.

    T1: after premedication, just before the onset of anesthesia; T2: 30 seconds after intravenous administration of propofol; T3: just before the endotracheal intubation; T4: 60 seconds after the endotracheal intubation; T5: 5 minutes after the endotracheal

Study Arms (2)

TIVA group

OTHER

The participants scheduled for elective ENT procedures or for elective discectomy. The surgery was performed under totally intravenous anesthesia. During procedure, monitoring of the proper level of general anesthesia both clinical and instrumental was performed.

Other: monitoring of the proper level of general anesthesia

VA group

OTHER

The participants scheduled for elective ENT procedures or for elective discectomy. The surgery was performed under volatile anesthesia. During procedure, monitoring of the proper level of general anesthesia both clinical and instrumental was performed.

Other: monitoring of the proper level of general anesthesia

Interventions

The monitoring of the adequate level of general anesthesia was performed both clinically and instrumentally.

Also known as: clinical monitoring, instrumental monitoring
TIVA groupVA group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 61 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • patients scheduled for ENT procedures or discectomy,
  • preoperative health status I or II according to ASA score.

You may not qualify if:

  • patients below 18 or above 61 year old,
  • ASA status III or higher,
  • patients suffering from: (i) hearing problems or tinnitus, (ii) chronic inflammation of the ear, (iii) epilepsy, and (iv) mental disorders,
  • pregnancy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy

Warsaw, 04-141, Poland

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Saper CB, Chou TC, Scammell TE. The sleep switch: hypothalamic control of sleep and wakefulness. Trends Neurosci. 2001 Dec;24(12):726-31. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)02002-6.

    PMID: 11718878BACKGROUND
  • Nelson LE, Guo TZ, Lu J, Saper CB, Franks NP, Maze M. The sedative component of anesthesia is mediated by GABA(A) receptors in an endogenous sleep pathway. Nat Neurosci. 2002 Oct;5(10):979-84. doi: 10.1038/nn913.

    PMID: 12195434BACKGROUND
  • Lu J, Nelson LE, Franks N, Maze M, Chamberlin NL, Saper CB. Role of endogenous sleep-wake and analgesic systems in anesthesia. J Comp Neurol. 2008 Jun 1;508(4):648-62. doi: 10.1002/cne.21685.

    PMID: 18383504BACKGROUND
  • Ghoneim MM, Block RI, Haffarnan M, Mathews MJ. Awareness during anesthesia: risk factors, causes and sequelae: a review of reported cases in the literature. Anesth Analg. 2009 Feb;108(2):527-35. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318193c634.

    PMID: 19151283BACKGROUND
  • Wang DS, Orser BA. Inhibition of learning and memory by general anesthetics. Can J Anaesth. 2011 Feb;58(2):167-77. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9428-8. Epub 2010 Dec 23.

    PMID: 21181566BACKGROUND
  • Sebel PS, Bowdle TA, Ghoneim MM, Rampil IJ, Padilla RE, Gan TJ, Domino KB. The incidence of awareness during anesthesia: a multicenter United States study. Anesth Analg. 2004 Sep;99(3):833-839. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130261.90896.6C.

    PMID: 15333419BACKGROUND
  • Osterman JE, Hopper J, Heran WJ, Keane TM, van der Kolk BA. Awareness under anesthesia and the development of posttraumatic stress disorder. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2001 Jul-Aug;23(4):198-204. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(01)00142-6.

    PMID: 11543846BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Clinical Trials Data Monitoring Committees

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Professional Staff CommitteesQuality Assurance, Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
During the anesthesia, in all the participants an AAI-A line ARX index was continuously monitored. The electrodes were placed after the induction of anesthesia. Intraoperatively, both auditory evoked potentials with AAI index and electroencephalogram with burst suppression analysis was recorded. Recorded data were blinded for anesthesiologists, so were not used for analysis of level of anesthesia during surgery.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants are assigned to intravenous or volatile anesthesia. In both groups both the clinical and instrumental monitoring of the proper level of anesthesia was analyzed.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Adjunct professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2017

First Posted

November 6, 2017

Study Start

April 20, 2012

Primary Completion

August 30, 2013

Study Completion

July 14, 2014

Last Updated

November 6, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations