Monitoring of Adequate Course of General Anesthesia
MoDA
A Comparison of Efficacy of Clinical Parameters With Auditory Evoked Potentials in Monitoring of Adequate Course of General Anesthesia
MoDA
A Comparison of Efficacy of Clinical Parameters With Auditory Evoked Potentials in Monitoring of Adequate Course of General Anesthesia
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
208
1 country
1
Study Start
April 20, 2012
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
August 30, 2013
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 14, 2014
Actual (reported)Clinical monitoring is the most common method of adjustment of the appropriate level of general anesthesia. However, the episodes of intraoperative awareness are still reported, suggesting that clinical observations may not be sufficient in some cases. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of clinical and instrumental neuromonitoring with auditory evoked potentials in intraoperative analysis of the proper level of general anesthesia. The patients scheduled for elective surgery were included into the study, and randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the first group (TIVA group) underwent intravenous, in the second group (VA group) underwent volatile anesthesia. The adequacy of anesthesia was analyzed with standard clinical parameters. All the participants were instrumentally monitored with AAI index. After the anesthesia patients received a questionnaire with the questions regarding possible intraoperative awareness.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
July 14, 2014
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
April 20, 2012
Actual (reported)August 30, 2013
Actual (reported)July 14, 2014
Actual (reported)October 29, 2017
Actual (reported)November 6, 2017
Actual (reported)Changes in AAI values in selected (16) time points.
T1: after premedication, just before the onset of anesthesia; T2: 30 seconds after intravenous administration of propofol; T3: just before the endotracheal intubation; T4: 60 seconds after the endotracheal intubation; T5: 5 minutes after the endotracheal
The participants scheduled for elective ENT procedures or for elective discectomy. The surgery was performed under totally intravenous anesthesia. During procedure, monitoring of the proper level of general anesthesia both clinical and instrumental was performed.
The participants scheduled for elective ENT procedures or for elective discectomy. The surgery was performed under volatile anesthesia. During procedure, monitoring of the proper level of general anesthesia both clinical and instrumental was performed.
The monitoring of the adequate level of general anesthesia was performed both clinically and instrumentally.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy
Warsaw, 04-141, Poland
Saper CB, Chou TC, Scammell TE. The sleep switch: hypothalamic control of sleep and wakefulness. Trends Neurosci. 2001 Dec;24(12):726-31. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)02002-6.
Nelson LE, Guo TZ, Lu J, Saper CB, Franks NP, Maze M. The sedative component of anesthesia is mediated by GABA(A) receptors in an endogenous sleep pathway. Nat Neurosci. 2002 Oct;5(10):979-84. doi: 10.1038/nn913.
Lu J, Nelson LE, Franks N, Maze M, Chamberlin NL, Saper CB. Role of endogenous sleep-wake and analgesic systems in anesthesia. J Comp Neurol. 2008 Jun 1;508(4):648-62. doi: 10.1002/cne.21685.
208 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
October 29, 2017
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Ghoneim MM, Block RI, Haffarnan M, Mathews MJ. Awareness during anesthesia: risk factors, causes and sequelae: a review of reported cases in the literature. Anesth Analg. 2009 Feb;108(2):527-35. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318193c634.
Wang DS, Orser BA. Inhibition of learning and memory by general anesthetics. Can J Anaesth. 2011 Feb;58(2):167-77. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9428-8. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
Sebel PS, Bowdle TA, Ghoneim MM, Rampil IJ, Padilla RE, Gan TJ, Domino KB. The incidence of awareness during anesthesia: a multicenter United States study. Anesth Analg. 2004 Sep;99(3):833-839. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130261.90896.6C.
Osterman JE, Hopper J, Heran WJ, Keane TM, van der Kolk BA. Awareness under anesthesia and the development of posttraumatic stress disorder. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2001 Jul-Aug;23(4):198-204. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(01)00142-6.
First Posted
November 6, 2017
Study Start
April 20, 2012
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
August 30, 2013
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 14, 2014
Actual (reported)Last Updated
November 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: