Neurorehabilitation Using a Virtual Reality-based Mirror Therapy
Effects of a Virtual Reality-Based Mirror NeuroRehabilitation System (VR-based MNRS) on Functional Performance of Upper Extremity for Unilateral Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
134
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the proposed study, the investigators assumed that mirror therapy combined with virtual reality technology will provide a better treatment effects than traditional mirror therapy for the patients with unilateral stroke. The aim of the study is to examine the difference in the treatment effects among the combination of task-oriented training with either virtual reality based mirror therapy, mirror therapy or traditional occupational therapy on the upper extremity function and brain activity of the stroke patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 13, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 20, 2024
CompletedMarch 21, 2024
March 1, 2023
6.4 years
October 30, 2017
March 20, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change in the result of Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) for motor function of upper extremity test
Each item is rated on a three-point ordinal scale (2 points for the detail being performed completely, 1 point for the detail being performed partially, and 0 for the detail not being performed). The maximum motor performance score is 66 points for the upper extremity.
baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks
Change in the result of Modified Ashworth scale (MAS)
Muscle tone is defined by the resistance of a muscle being stretched without resistance. The MAS scores were distributed across the entire scale, ranging from 0 to 4, that is convenient for the clinician use. The grading of the scale is described as below: 0) no increase in muscle tone; 1) minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion; 1+) slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the reminder (less than half) of the ROM; 2) more marked increase in tone but only after part is easily flexed; 3) considerable increase in tone; and 4) passive movement is difficult and affected part is rigid in flexion or extension.
baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks
Change in the result of Box and blocks test
The score is the number of blocks carried from one box to the other in one minute. Higher values represent a better outcome.
baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks
Change in the result of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) test
The Semmes-Weinstein monofilamenttest examines the cutaneous pressure threshold, range from 1.65-6.65. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks
Change in the result of Motor Activity Log
Semi-structured interview examine how much and how well the subject uses their more-affected arm for 30 ADLs. Score range from 0-180. Higher values represent a better outcome.
baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Power Spectrum of the Electroencephalography (EEG)
baseline and 6 weeks
Changes in Cortical Excitability Assessed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
baseline and 6 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Traditional occupational therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe program includes 30 minutes of traditional occupational therapy (sensorimotor facilitation techniques, such as: Rood, Bobath and propriocetive-neuromuscular-facilitation), followed by 20 minutes of motor task specific training in each treatment session.
Mirror therapy using a mirror box
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe program includes 30 minutes of mirror therapy, followed by 20 minutes of regular motor task specific training in each treatment session.
Virtual reality based mirror therapy
EXPERIMENTALThe program includes 30 minutes treatment session of virtual reality mirror therapy, followed by 20 minutes of motor task specific training in each treatment session.
Interventions
Motor training targeted to goals that are relevant to the functional needs of the patient
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of stroke with unilateral side involved;
- A score of Mini-mental state examination greater than 24 for proving higher mental function;
- Time of onset \> 6 months before treatment begins, and
- Premorbid right-handedness.
You may not qualify if:
- Vision loss;
- Major cognitive-perceptual deficit;
- Other brain disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
Tainan, 704, Taiwan
Related Publications (1)
Hsu HY, Kuo LC, Lin YC, Su FC, Yang TH, Lin CW. Effects of a Virtual Reality-Based Mirror Therapy Program on Improving Sensorimotor Function of Hands in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Jun;36(6):335-345. doi: 10.1177/15459683221081430. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
PMID: 35341360DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 30, 2017
First Posted
November 6, 2017
Study Start
November 13, 2017
Primary Completion
March 20, 2024
Study Completion
March 20, 2024
Last Updated
March 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-03