Assessing the Effectiveness of Midazolam Premedication
Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Effectiveness of Midazolam Premedication as an Anxiolytic, Analgesic, Sedative, and Hemodynamic Stabilizer
1 other identifier
interventional
128
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pre-anesthetic dosing of midazolam is commonly used in many hospitals for the induction of anesthesia, but the effect is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of midazolam premedication in four aspects: anxiety reduction, pain relief, sedation and hemodynamic stability.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 19, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2017
CompletedOctober 31, 2017
October 1, 2017
1.1 years
October 22, 2017
October 28, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Change in degree of anxiety
Patients completed the Beck anxiety inventory (BAI) on two separate occasions, the anesthesiologist's visit on the day before surgery and pre-induction time after randomization. The BAI was a self-report questionnaire consisting of 21 questions.
the anesthesiologist's visit on the day before surgery and pre-induction time after randomization
Change in sedation level
Measuring the entropy value (CARESCAPE Monitor B850, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA).
At the time of pre-induction (initial), prior to intubation, intubation, prior to incision, and surgical incision
Change in noninvasive blood pressure (hemodynamic parameters 1)
Measuring noninvasive blood pressure (CARESCAPE Monitor B850, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA)
At the time of pre-induction (initial), prior to intubation, intubation, prior to incision, and surgical incision
Change in SPI value (Analgesic profile 1)
Measuring SPI (CARESCAPE Monitor B850, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA), which was calculated from the pulse oximetry wave
At the time of pre-induction (initial), prior to intubation, intubation, prior to incision, and surgical incision
Numeric rating scale (Analgesic profile 2)
Reviewing numeric rating scale (NRS) : 0 (No pain) \~ 10 (Worst possible pain)
Postoperative period (until transition to oral analgesics, up to 12 hours)
Analgesic requirement (Analgesic profile 3)
Reviewing additional medications for pain control
Postoperative period (until transition to oral analgesics, up to 12 hours)
Change in heart rate (hemodynamic parameters 2)
Measuring heart rate (CARESCAPE Monitor B850, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA)
At the time of pre-induction (initial), prior to intubation, intubation, prior to incision, and surgical incision
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Procedure time of intubation
From the beginning of anesthesia to the completion of intubation
Correlation analysis between the SPI values and other parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, and entropy values)
At the time of pre-induction (initial), prior to intubation, intubation, prior to incision, and surgical incision
Study Arms (2)
Midazolam premedication group (Group P)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients of group P were premedicated with intramuscular midazolam 0.05 mg/kg 30 minutes before surgery.
Control group (Group N)
OTHERPatients of group N were not premedicated with midazolam (Do not use placebo). \[Treatment of Glycopyrrolate (0.2 mg, IM) 30 minutes prior to surgery is not intervention because it is a routine practice of this center. (-\> removed from interventions)\]
Interventions
Patients in Group P received midazolam (0.05 mg/kg, intramuscular injection) 30 minutes before induction of general anesthesia.
Target controlled infusion of remifentanil (4ng/ml) was used for induction of anesthesia based on the pharmacological models of Minto. After intubation, remifentanil (2 ng/ml) was infused until incision time. (Both groups)
Target controlled infusion of propofol (4.0 μg/ml) was used for induction of anesthesia based on the pharmacological models of Marsh. After intubation, propofol (3.0μg/ml) was infused until incision time. (Both groups)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I or II
- Scheduled for elective thyroidectomy under general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Central nervous system disorders
- Major cardiovascular disease
- Chronic pain disorders
- Peripheral neuropathy
- Diabetes mellitus neuropathy
- Nephropathy
- Hepatopathy
- Taking any medication affecting the central nervous system or heart rate
- Alcohol or drug abuse
- Pregnancy
- Contraindication to midazolam premedication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pusan national university hospital
Busan, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hyeon-Jeong Lee, PhD
Pusan National University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2017
First Posted
October 30, 2017
Study Start
July 19, 2016
Primary Completion
August 14, 2017
Study Completion
August 15, 2017
Last Updated
October 31, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share