Factors Influencing Patient Choice of Bladder Reconstruction Following Radical Cystectomy
1 other identifier
observational
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Radical cystectomy (bladder removal) after bladder cancer necessitates surgical reconstruction to allow urine drainage. Usually, this is achieved by either ileal conduit (a stoma leads to an external bag) or orthotopic neobladder (the creation of an artificial internal bladder). These treatments are most successful when tailored to the patient's own lifestyle needs. The current project will explore patient concerns, and the aspects of their lifestyles and values, that influence their choice of bladder reconstruction. It will also examine which of these concerns and values best predict satisfaction and enhanced QoL, following bladder reconstruction. Participants will be recruited from Health Board databases of those who have had advanced bladder cancer (grade pT1 and above) and undergone either IC or NB procedures within the last five years. 40 participants (equal numbers with each surgical procedure) will be randomly selected from the patient databases. They will be interviewed by a Researcher and a Clinical Nurse Specialist. A semi-structured interview will be conducted to ascertain patients' views about the key factors influencing their treatment decision and their satisfaction with the outcome. Approximately 200 participants (equal numbers with IC and NB) will be sent three questionnaires to assess their life values, QoL, and satisfaction with treatment: (1) Bladder Reconstruction Satisfaction Questionnaire measuring levels of satisfaction with bladder reconstruction; (2) EORTC QLQ-C30 measuring QoL in areas relevant to cancer patients; and (3) Life Values Inventory measuring values and lifestyles important to patients. Participants will be asked to complete the questionnaires and return them using a prepaid envelope. Participants will be provided with the contact details of a Clinical Nurse Specialist known to them to contact if they require help completing the questionnaires.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2021
CompletedOctober 28, 2022
October 1, 2022
3.9 years
October 25, 2017
October 27, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Bladder Reconstruction Satisfaction Questionnaire
2 Years
EORTC QLQ-30
2 Years
The Life Values Inventory
2 Years
Study Arms (1)
Bladder Cancer Patients
Participants will be recruited from those who have had advanced bladder cancer (grade pT1 and above) and undergone either IC or NB procedures within the last five years. No form of payment will be offered for participation, but participants will be reimbursed for travel expenses. There will be no other inclusion or exclusion criteria in order to access a wide range of patients with potentially different values and lifestyles, and to aid in the recruitment of adequate sample sizes.
Interventions
Investigating patient experience of bladder reconstructions.
Eligibility Criteria
Participants will be recruited from those who have had advanced bladder cancer (grade pT1 and above) and undergone either ileal conduit (IC) or neobladder (NB) procedures within the last five years.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Swansea Universitylead
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Boardcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Professor Phil Reed
Swansea, SA2 8PP, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2017
First Posted
October 30, 2017
Study Start
October 20, 2017
Primary Completion
September 30, 2021
Study Completion
September 30, 2021
Last Updated
October 28, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share