NCT03321799

Brief Summary

Wound complications and surgical site infections following revision total joint arthroplasty result in significant morbidity and cost. To the investigators knowledge, no prospective, randomized controlled trials have examined the rate of wound complications, infection, and reoperation following revision total hip arthroplasty when treated with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) versus sterile dressings. The investigators hypothesize that the rate of wound complications, infections, and subsequent procedures in patients undergoing revision THA treatment will demonstrate a statistically and clinically relevant decrease when using NPWT versus sterile dressing.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
201

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2017

Longer than P75 for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 28, 2017

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 23, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 26, 2017

Completed
6.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 14, 2024

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 11, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 6, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6.9 years

First QC Date

October 23, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 4, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Wound complications

    Wound complications within 90 days of a revision total hip arthroplasty include: wound dehiscence, prolonged drainage for \>7 days postoperatively, hematoma formation, surgical site infection, or periprosthetic joint infection that requires postoperative interventions (i.e. unplanned office visits, topical application of antibiotics or PO antibiotics, in-office wound debridement or removal of suture material, hematoma aspiration and drainage) or a return to the operating room/reoperation.

    90 days

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Reoperation

    90 days

  • Cost comparison

    90 days

Study Arms (2)

Sterile Antimicrobial Dressings

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Control group, current hospital standard. AQUACEL is left in place for 7 days unless it becomes saturated over 50%, which requires a premature dressing change.

Device: Sterile Antimicrobial Dressings

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental group. Negative pressure wound therapy bandage applied intra-operatively by a physician on the treatment team. The dressing will be removed after 7 days postoperatively, or if the battery power stops earlier.

Device: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT)

Interventions

A computer randomization system will be used on the day of surgery to allocate patients to either the conventional or NPWT dressing. Due to the nature of this study, blinding of patients and surgeons to their allocated cohort will not be possible.

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)

Control group, current hospital standard.

Sterile Antimicrobial Dressings

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients \> 18 years of age undergoing a revision total hip arthroplasty procedure to include:
  • Conversion of a prior open hip surgery (i.e. open reduction internal fixation of a proximal femur fracture) to a total hip arthroplasty
  • Aseptic revision for a diagnosis of component loosening, osteolysis, or revision procedure for periprosthetic fracture that requires revision of a component of the THA prosthesis (excluded isolated open reduction internal fixation of the fracture or initial placement of a hemi- or total hip arthroplasty)
  • Septic revision surgery including irrigation and debridement of a postoperative infection or hematoma, one-stage exchange for acute postoperative infection, explantation and placement of an antibiotic cement spacer
  • Reimplantation of a THA following placement of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer
  • The incision can be closed primarily without muscle flaps or skin grafting
  • Willingness to undergo randomization and return for all scheduled visits

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients requiring a muscle flap or skin grafting for wound closure
  • Pregnant or lactating female
  • Known sensitivity to the study product components (adhesives, etc.)
  • Allergy to silver

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Anne DeBenedetti

Chicago, Illinois, 60607, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Infections

Interventions

Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DrainageTherapeuticsSurgical Procedures, OperativeWound Closure Techniques

Study Officials

  • Denis Nam, MD, MSc

    Rush University Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2017

First Posted

October 26, 2017

Study Start

April 28, 2017

Primary Completion

March 14, 2024

Study Completion

July 11, 2025

Last Updated

August 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Locations