Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs. Conventional Dressings for Prevention of Wound Complications After Revision THA
1 other identifier
interventional
201
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Wound complications and surgical site infections following revision total joint arthroplasty result in significant morbidity and cost. To the investigators knowledge, no prospective, randomized controlled trials have examined the rate of wound complications, infection, and reoperation following revision total hip arthroplasty when treated with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) versus sterile dressings. The investigators hypothesize that the rate of wound complications, infections, and subsequent procedures in patients undergoing revision THA treatment will demonstrate a statistically and clinically relevant decrease when using NPWT versus sterile dressing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Apr 2017
Longer than P75 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 28, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 14, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 11, 2025
CompletedAugust 6, 2025
August 1, 2025
6.9 years
October 23, 2017
August 4, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Wound complications
Wound complications within 90 days of a revision total hip arthroplasty include: wound dehiscence, prolonged drainage for \>7 days postoperatively, hematoma formation, surgical site infection, or periprosthetic joint infection that requires postoperative interventions (i.e. unplanned office visits, topical application of antibiotics or PO antibiotics, in-office wound debridement or removal of suture material, hematoma aspiration and drainage) or a return to the operating room/reoperation.
90 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Reoperation
90 days
Cost comparison
90 days
Study Arms (2)
Sterile Antimicrobial Dressings
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl group, current hospital standard. AQUACEL is left in place for 7 days unless it becomes saturated over 50%, which requires a premature dressing change.
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)
EXPERIMENTALExperimental group. Negative pressure wound therapy bandage applied intra-operatively by a physician on the treatment team. The dressing will be removed after 7 days postoperatively, or if the battery power stops earlier.
Interventions
A computer randomization system will be used on the day of surgery to allocate patients to either the conventional or NPWT dressing. Due to the nature of this study, blinding of patients and surgeons to their allocated cohort will not be possible.
Control group, current hospital standard.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients \> 18 years of age undergoing a revision total hip arthroplasty procedure to include:
- Conversion of a prior open hip surgery (i.e. open reduction internal fixation of a proximal femur fracture) to a total hip arthroplasty
- Aseptic revision for a diagnosis of component loosening, osteolysis, or revision procedure for periprosthetic fracture that requires revision of a component of the THA prosthesis (excluded isolated open reduction internal fixation of the fracture or initial placement of a hemi- or total hip arthroplasty)
- Septic revision surgery including irrigation and debridement of a postoperative infection or hematoma, one-stage exchange for acute postoperative infection, explantation and placement of an antibiotic cement spacer
- Reimplantation of a THA following placement of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer
- The incision can be closed primarily without muscle flaps or skin grafting
- Willingness to undergo randomization and return for all scheduled visits
You may not qualify if:
- Patients requiring a muscle flap or skin grafting for wound closure
- Pregnant or lactating female
- Known sensitivity to the study product components (adhesives, etc.)
- Allergy to silver
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rush University Medical Centerlead
- 3Mcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Anne DeBenedetti
Chicago, Illinois, 60607, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Denis Nam, MD, MSc
Rush University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2017
First Posted
October 26, 2017
Study Start
April 28, 2017
Primary Completion
March 14, 2024
Study Completion
July 11, 2025
Last Updated
August 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08