Accuracy of Guided Implant Placement Using Double Versus Triple Scan Protocol in Completely Edentulous Patients
1 other identifier
observational
16
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
16 implant placement by surgical guide using double scan protocol versus triple scan protocol to Evaluate angular and linear deviation of virtual implants and actual implant position in completely edentulous patients according to scanning protocol C1(double scan technique) and C2 (triple scan technique) .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Nov 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 20, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2018
CompletedNovember 7, 2017
November 1, 2017
2 months
October 22, 2017
November 5, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of angular deviation between planned implants in surgical guide and actual implant position in completely edentulous patients .
Evaluation of angular deviation between planned implants in surgical guide and actual implant position in completely edentulous patients according to scanning protocol C1(double scan technique) and C2 (triple scan technique) .
immediate post operative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of linear deviation between planned implants in surgical guide and actual implant position in completely edentulous patients
immediate post operative
Study Arms (2)
double scan protocol
In C1(double scan technique) , after CT scan for patient wearing scan appliance , two optical scan for the model with and without scan appliance.
triple scan protocol
In C2 (triple scan technique) , after CT scan for patient wearing scan appliance , CT scan for scan appliance alone .
Interventions
Scanning strategy is based on multiple scans. Essentially one CT scan of the patient (usually with a scan appliance). Another CT scan of the model or scan appliance may be required (double scan technique). Such a second CT scan can be replaced by optical scanning of the model and scan appliance (triple scan technique).
Eligibility Criteria
patients receiving dental implants in both arches by guided surgery using double versus triple scan protocol .
You may qualify if:
- patients totally edentulous arches.
- patients with Bucco-lingual bone thickness \>6 mm allowing flapless implant placement
- patients free from any systemic diseases that may affect bone quality e.g diabetes.
You may not qualify if:
- patients with thin ridges.
- patients with systemic disease that may affect bone quality.
- Patients with poor oral hygiene and active periodontal diseases.
- Anatomical situations requiring regenerative procedure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2017
First Posted
October 25, 2017
Study Start
November 20, 2017
Primary Completion
February 1, 2018
Study Completion
February 1, 2018
Last Updated
November 7, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11