Acthar Gel in Participants With Pulmonary Sarcoidosis
PULSAR
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Exploratory Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Acthar Gel in Subjects With Pulmonary Sarcoidosis
1 other identifier
interventional
55
1 country
29
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to find out if Acthar Gel is safe and effective to treat pulmonary sarcoidosis. Participants will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to receive a shot under their skin of Acthar Gel or a matching placebo gel that has no drug in it. They will receive their assigned shot twice a week for 24 weeks. All participants who complete the 24-week treatment period will be eligible to receive Acthar Gel for 24 more weeks, even if they were originally in the placebo group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Feb 2018
Longer than P75 for phase_4
29 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 21, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 15, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 27, 2023
CompletedFebruary 27, 2023
February 1, 2023
3.7 years
October 20, 2017
November 14, 2022
February 24, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), a Pulmonary Function Test Parameter at Week 24
Forced vital capacity (FVC) is a pulmonary function test parameter that indicates the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. It's measured by spirometry, which is a common breathing test to check lung function. Based on the absolute change of percent predicted, FVC was evaluated to determine if the condition is: * Improved (+1) \[≥ 5% absolute change\] * Unchanged (0) \[\>- 5% to \< 5% absolute change\], or * Worse (-1) \[≤ -5% absolute change\] An additional category "Missing Assessment" indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure.
Week 24
OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on FVC, a Pulmonary Function Test Parameter at Week 48
Forced vital capacity (FVC) is a pulmonary function test parameter that indicates the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. It's measured by spirometry, which is a common breathing test to check lung function. Based on the absolute change of percent predicted, FVC was evaluated to determine if the condition is: * Improved (+1) \[≥ 5% absolute change\] * Unchanged (0) \[\>- 5% to \< 5% absolute change\], or * Worse (-1) \[≤ -5% absolute change\] An additional category "Missing Assessment" indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure.
Week 48
DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on the Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO), a Pulmonary Function Test Parameter at Week 24
The diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) measures the ability of the lungs to transfer gas from inhaled air to the red blood cells in the blood. Participants are asked to fully inhale a low concentration of carbon monoxide and an inert tracer gas. Based on the absolute change of percent predicted, DLCO was evaluated to determine if the condition is: * Improved (+1) \[≥ 5% absolute change\] * Unchanged (0) \[\>- 5% to \< 5% absolute change\], * Worse (-1) \[≤ -5% absolute change\] An additional category "Missing Assessment" indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure.
Week 24
OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on the DLCO, a Pulmonary Function Test Parameter at Week 48
The diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) measures the ability of the lungs to transfer gas from inhaled air to the red blood cells in the blood. Participants are asked to fully inhale a low concentration of carbon monoxide and an inert tracer gas. Based on the absolute change of percent predicted, DLCO was evaluated to determine if the condition is: * Improved (+1) \[≥ 5% absolute change\] * Unchanged (0) \[\>- 5% to \< 5% absolute change\], * Worse (-1) \[≤ -5% absolute change\] An additional category "Missing Assessment" indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure.
Week 48
DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on High Resolution Computer Tomography (HRCT) at Week 24
High-resolution computer tomography (HRCT) is a type of computed tomography (CT) with specific techniques to enhance image resolution. It is used in the diagnosis of various health problems, most commonly for lung disease. These images show cross sections (slices) through the lungs. HRCT imaging was evaluated by the investigator/radiologist and the central reader to determine if the condition is improved (+1), unchanged (0), or worse (-1). An additional category "Missing Assessment" indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure.
Week 24
OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on HRCT at Week 48
High-resolution computer tomography (HRCT) is a type of computed tomography (CT) with specific techniques to enhance image resolution. It is used in the diagnosis of various health problems, most commonly for lung disease. These images show cross sections (slices) through the lungs. HRCT imaging was evaluated by the investigator/radiologist and the central reader to determine if the condition is improved (+1), unchanged (0), or worse (-1). An additional category "Missing Assessment" indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure.
Week 48
DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on the King's Sarcoidosis Questionnaire (KSQ) (General Health), a Quality of Life Parameter at Week 24
King's sarcoidosis questionnaire (KSQ) (General Health) is a 28-item questionnaire for participants to indicate the status of their sarcoidosis and treatment. Each item was answered on a 7-point scale where 1 means the participant experiences the symptom all the time and 7 means the participant does not experience the symptom at all. Higher scores indicate improvement, and a change of 4 points is considered clinically meaningful. The score on the scale was evaluated to determine if the condition is: * Improved (+1) based on a change of ≥ 4 points * Unchanged (0) based on a change of \>- 4 to \< 4 points * Worse (-1) based on a change of ≤ -4 points An additional category "Missing Assessment" indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure.
Week 24
OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on the KSQ (General Health), a Quality of Life Parameter at Week 48
King's sarcoidosis questionnaire (KSQ) (General Health) is a 28-item questionnaire for participants to indicate the status of their sarcoidosis and treatment. Each item was answered on a 7-point scale where 1 means the participant experiences the symptom all the time and 7 means the participant does not experience the symptom at all. Higher scores indicate improvement, and a change of 4 points is considered clinically meaningful. The score on the scale was evaluated to determine if the condition is: * Improved (+1) based on a change of ≥ 4 points * Unchanged (0) based on a change of \>- 4 to \< 4 points * Worse (-1) based on a change of ≤ -4 points An additional category "Missing Assessment" indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure.
Week 48
DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on the Fatigue Assessment Score (FAS), a Quality of Life Parameter at Week 24
The fatigue assessment score (FAS) is a 10-item checklist for participants to indicate the level of their fatigue. Each item was answered on a 5-point scale where 1 means the participant does not experience the symptom all and 5 means the participant experiences the symptom all the time. Lower scores indicate improvement (less fatigue) and a change of 4 points is considered clinically meaningful. The score on the scale was evaluated to determine if the condition is: * Improved (+1) based on a change of ≤ -4 points * Unchanged (0) based on a change of \>- 4 to \< 4 points * Worse (-1) based on a change of ≥ 4 points An additional category "Missing Assessment" indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure.
Week 24
OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on FAS, a Quality of Life Parameter at Week 48
The fatigue assessment score (FAS) is a 10-item checklist for participants to indicate the level of their fatigue. Each item was answered on a 5-point scale where 1 means the participant does not experience the symptom all and 5 means the participant experiences the symptom all the time. Lower scores indicate improvement (less fatigue) and a change of 4 points is considered clinically meaningful. The score on the scale was evaluated to determine if the condition is: * Improved (+1) based on a change of ≤ -4 points * Unchanged (0) based on a change of \>- 4 to \< 4 points * Worse (-1) based on a change of ≥ 4 points An additional category "Missing Assessment" indicates the participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure.
Week 48
DBT: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on Corticosteroid Taper Score in Participants Receiving Each Dose of Prednisone at Week 24
Corticosteroids are first line treatment for sarcoidosis. Concerns of corticosteroid toxicity led to efforts to taper dose sooner. Participants were clinically evaluated at each visit by investigator and categorized by their condition; dose was tapered using algorithm to take them off prednisone using incremental doses of 40,30,20,10,7.5,5,2.5,0 mg, as explained with each category below. * Improved: When condition improved, reduce dose by 1 level * Unchanged: 1. When stable condition without toxicity: At first stable visit they continue same dose; at second stable visit, reduce dose by 1 level 2. When stable condition with toxicity: toxicity is treated; reduce dose by 1 level * Deteriorate: When worsening condition, increase dose by 1 or 2 levels but not \>40mg/day Dose tapering was done based on the participant's clinical condition. Category "Missing Assessment" indicates participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure.
Week 24
OLE: Number of Participants in Each Category of Assessment Based on Corticosteroid Taper Score in Participants Receiving Each Dose of Prednisone at Week 48
Corticosteroids are first line treatment for sarcoidosis. Concerns of corticosteroid toxicity led to efforts to taper dose sooner. Participants were clinically evaluated at each visit by investigator and categorized by their condition; dose was tapered using algorithm to take them off prednisone using incremental doses of 40,30,20,10,7.5,5,2.5,0 mg, as explained with each category below. * Improved: When condition improved, reduce dose by 1 level * Unchanged: 1. When stable condition without toxicity: At first stable visit they continue same dose; at second stable visit, reduce dose by 1 level 2. When stable condition with toxicity: toxicity is treated; reduce dose by 1 level * Deteriorate: When worsening condition, increase dose by 1 or 2 levels but not \>40mg/day Dose tapering was done based on the participant's clinical condition. Category "Missing Assessment" indicates participants who had a missing assessment for this outcome measure.
Week 48
Study Arms (2)
Acthar Gel in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received Acthar Gel as a 1 milliliter (mL) injection under the skin, twice weekly, for 24 weeks in the double-blind treatment (DBT) phase. Participants, who chose to continue into the optional OLE phase, then received Acthar Gel as a 1 mL injection under the skin, twice weekly, for another 24 weeks in the optional open-label extension (OLE) phase.
Placebo in DBT Then Acthar Gel in OLE
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received Acthar Gel matching placebo as a 1 mL injection under the skin, twice weekly, for 24 weeks in the DBT phase. Participants, who chose to continue into the optional OLE phase, then received Acthar Gel as a 1 mL injection under the skin, twice weekly, for another 24 weeks in the optional OLE phase.
Interventions
Acthar Gel for subcutaneous (SC) injection (80 units per 1 mL)
Placebo gel for SC injection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has biopsy-confirmed sarcoidosis meeting American Thoracic Society criteria ≥ 1 year at screening (Visit 1)
- Has protocol-defined symptomatic pulmonary disease
- Has been receiving a stable prednisone dose between 5 mg and 40 mg (or equivalent) for pulmonary sarcoidosis, for at least 4 weeks before screening, or a stable dose of another disease-modifying anti-sarcoidosis drug for at least 3 months before screening
- Has lung function within protocol-defined parameters
You may not qualify if:
- Has at least a 10% change in forced vital capacity (FVC) on spirometry between Visits 1 and 2
- Has pulmonary arterial hypertension requiring treatment
- Has been treated with antitumor necrosis factor-α antibody within the past 3 months
- Has any pulmonary condition that requires treatment, therefore impeding corticosteroid tapering
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mallinckrodtlead
Study Sites (29)
UAB Lung Health Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
David Geffen School of Medicine
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
National Jewish Health
Denver, Colorado, 80206, United States
University of Florida Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
Miami, Florida, 33125, United States
Central Florida Pulmonary Group PA
Orlando, Florida, 32803, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Laporte County Institute For Clinical Research
Michigan City, Indiana, 46360, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States
Howard County Center for Lung and Sleep Medicine, LLC
Columbia, Maryland, 21044, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Valley Medical Group
Ridgewood, New Jersey, 07450, United States
Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, 12208, United States
American Health Research Inc
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Clinical Research of Gastonia
Gastonia, North Carolina, 28054, United States
University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
Temple Lung Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Berks Schuylkill Respiratory Specialists, Ltd
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610, United States
VitaLink Research - Anderson
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621, United States
Medical University of South Carolina - PPDS
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Clinical Research of Charleston
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464, United States
Clinical Research of Rock Hill
Rock Hill, South Carolina, 29732, United States
VitaLink Research - Spartanburg
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler
Tyler, Texas, 75708, United States
Related Publications (1)
Mirsaeidi M, Baughman RP, Sahoo D, Tarau E. Results From a Phase 4, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Repository Corticotropin Injection for the Treatment of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis. Pulm Ther. 2023 Jun;9(2):237-253. doi: 10.1007/s41030-023-00222-2. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
PMID: 37072607DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Information Call Center
- Organization
- Mallinckrodt
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Team Leader
Mallinckrodt
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2017
First Posted
October 25, 2017
Study Start
February 21, 2018
Primary Completion
November 15, 2021
Study Completion
November 15, 2021
Last Updated
February 27, 2023
Results First Posted
February 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share