NCT03318627

Brief Summary

Relevant problems of rotator cuff repair:

  • High retear rate after rotator cuff repair of 13%, despite regard of the criteria for "reparability" of a tear.
  • Long and exhausting rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair with an abduction splint for six weeks. Hypothesis: The investigators believe that high tension repair has a higher retear rate than low tension repair, regardless of the tear size. The investigators also believe that abduction of the arm can reduce relevant tension on the repair. But not each repair benefits equally from this. Relevance of this hypothesis: The ingenious advantage of this new parameter (intraoperative repair tension) is, that it can be influenced. In future, if this hypothesis would be true, the repair tension could be reduced intraoperative by release, side-to-side (margin convergence) repair or medialization of the footprint and thereby convert a high risk to a low risk tension repair. Moreover, it could be that patients with a low tension repair does not necessarily have to wear an abduction splint. And on the other hand, high tension repair patients should probably wear the abduction splint longer with gradually reduction. Approach: The present research plan focused on a new intraoperative (arthroscopic) determinable parameter ("repair tension" on footprint in 0° and 40° abduction) to determine the risk of recurrence after tendon repair in rotator cuff tears, which are pre- and intraoperative defined as "reparable". Therefore, the tension of the repaired tendon is measured intraoperative with a spring balance (newtonmeter) and correlated with the postoperative retear-rate.
  • Measure intraoperative repair tension with the arm in 0° and 40° of abduction

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2020

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 29, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 24, 2017

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 6, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 6, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 6, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 14, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

June 29, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 11, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Tendon tension

    Measuring tendon Tension according to the footprint in 0° and 45° abduction with a Newtonmeter.

    during surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Rotator cuff re-tear

    one year

Study Arms (1)

Tension Measuring

OTHER

Measuring intraoperative tension of rotator cuff tendon with sterile spring Balance.

Device: Sterile Spring Scale

Interventions

Measuring intraoperative tension of tendon of rotator cuff tear

Tension Measuring

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Signed informed consent
  • Male/female from 18-99 years
  • All arthroscopic reparable transmural supra-/infraspinatus tears
  • German speaking

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous operation on the ipsilateral rotator cuff
  • Irreparable rotator cuff tear (supra- and / or infraspinatus and / or subscapularis)
  • static antero-superior subluxation of humeral head
  • dynamic antero-superior subluxation of humeral head
  • pseudoparalysis for anteflexion, hornblow sign, dropping- arm sign
  • fatty infiltration goutallier 3-4 (MRI)
  • reduced acromiohumeral distance \<7mm (RX)
  • intraoperative not reparable
  • Mild/severe osteoarthritis (RX, Hamada II-IV)
  • Inability of patient (language problems, mental illness, dementia)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (5)

  • Le BT, Wu XL, Lam PH, Murrell GA. Factors predicting rotator cuff retears: an analysis of 1000 consecutive rotator cuff repairs. Am J Sports Med. 2014 May;42(5):1134-42. doi: 10.1177/0363546514525336. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

    PMID: 24748610BACKGROUND
  • Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M, Hatzidakis AM, Krishnan SG. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jun;87(6):1229-40. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02035.

    PMID: 15930531BACKGROUND
  • Thomazeau H, Boukobza E, Morcet N, Chaperon J, Langlais F. Prediction of rotator cuff repair results by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Nov;(344):275-83.

    PMID: 9372778BACKGROUND
  • Meyer DC, Wieser K, Farshad M, Gerber C. Retraction of supraspinatus muscle and tendon as predictors of success of rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2242-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546512457587. Epub 2012 Aug 27.

    PMID: 22926748BACKGROUND
  • Liem D, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P, Habermeyer P. Magnetic resonance imaging of arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Aug;89(8):1770-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00749.

    PMID: 17671017BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2017

First Posted

October 24, 2017

Study Start

July 6, 2020

Primary Completion

July 6, 2020

Study Completion

July 6, 2020

Last Updated

July 14, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share