Study Stopped
No capacity to conduct the study
Influence of Intraoperative Repair Tension on Postoperative Healing of Full-thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
TENS-RCT
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Relevant problems of rotator cuff repair:
- High retear rate after rotator cuff repair of 13%, despite regard of the criteria for "reparability" of a tear.
- Long and exhausting rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair with an abduction splint for six weeks. Hypothesis: The investigators believe that high tension repair has a higher retear rate than low tension repair, regardless of the tear size. The investigators also believe that abduction of the arm can reduce relevant tension on the repair. But not each repair benefits equally from this. Relevance of this hypothesis: The ingenious advantage of this new parameter (intraoperative repair tension) is, that it can be influenced. In future, if this hypothesis would be true, the repair tension could be reduced intraoperative by release, side-to-side (margin convergence) repair or medialization of the footprint and thereby convert a high risk to a low risk tension repair. Moreover, it could be that patients with a low tension repair does not necessarily have to wear an abduction splint. And on the other hand, high tension repair patients should probably wear the abduction splint longer with gradually reduction. Approach: The present research plan focused on a new intraoperative (arthroscopic) determinable parameter ("repair tension" on footprint in 0° and 40° abduction) to determine the risk of recurrence after tendon repair in rotator cuff tears, which are pre- and intraoperative defined as "reparable". Therefore, the tension of the repaired tendon is measured intraoperative with a spring balance (newtonmeter) and correlated with the postoperative retear-rate.
- Measure intraoperative repair tension with the arm in 0° and 40° of abduction
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jul 2020
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 6, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 6, 2020
CompletedJuly 14, 2020
July 1, 2020
Same day
June 29, 2017
July 11, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Tendon tension
Measuring tendon Tension according to the footprint in 0° and 45° abduction with a Newtonmeter.
during surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Rotator cuff re-tear
one year
Study Arms (1)
Tension Measuring
OTHERMeasuring intraoperative tension of rotator cuff tendon with sterile spring Balance.
Interventions
Measuring intraoperative tension of tendon of rotator cuff tear
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent
- Male/female from 18-99 years
- All arthroscopic reparable transmural supra-/infraspinatus tears
- German speaking
You may not qualify if:
- Previous operation on the ipsilateral rotator cuff
- Irreparable rotator cuff tear (supra- and / or infraspinatus and / or subscapularis)
- static antero-superior subluxation of humeral head
- dynamic antero-superior subluxation of humeral head
- pseudoparalysis for anteflexion, hornblow sign, dropping- arm sign
- fatty infiltration goutallier 3-4 (MRI)
- reduced acromiohumeral distance \<7mm (RX)
- intraoperative not reparable
- Mild/severe osteoarthritis (RX, Hamada II-IV)
- Inability of patient (language problems, mental illness, dementia)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (5)
Le BT, Wu XL, Lam PH, Murrell GA. Factors predicting rotator cuff retears: an analysis of 1000 consecutive rotator cuff repairs. Am J Sports Med. 2014 May;42(5):1134-42. doi: 10.1177/0363546514525336. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
PMID: 24748610BACKGROUNDBoileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M, Hatzidakis AM, Krishnan SG. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jun;87(6):1229-40. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02035.
PMID: 15930531BACKGROUNDThomazeau H, Boukobza E, Morcet N, Chaperon J, Langlais F. Prediction of rotator cuff repair results by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Nov;(344):275-83.
PMID: 9372778BACKGROUNDMeyer DC, Wieser K, Farshad M, Gerber C. Retraction of supraspinatus muscle and tendon as predictors of success of rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2242-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546512457587. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
PMID: 22926748BACKGROUNDLiem D, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P, Habermeyer P. Magnetic resonance imaging of arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Aug;89(8):1770-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00749.
PMID: 17671017BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2017
First Posted
October 24, 2017
Study Start
July 6, 2020
Primary Completion
July 6, 2020
Study Completion
July 6, 2020
Last Updated
July 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share