NCT03318198

Brief Summary

Randomized cross over trial investigating the effect of intensive attending supervision of residents caring for inpatients on the medical service on both patient safety and educational outcomes. Hypothesis: increased attending supervision would improve patient safety and resident education.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
134

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2015

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2015

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2016

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2017

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 16, 2017

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 23, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

October 23, 2017

Status Verified

October 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

October 16, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 18, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Graduate Medical EducationAttending Supervision of ResidentsPatient Safety

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Measurement of the rate of medical errors defined as preventable adverse events and near misses. Patient Safety Outcome

    Using a previously validated protocol (PMID:24871238) to assess these outcomes, five research nurses reviewed the medical records, formal incident reports from the hospital incident-reporting system, daily pharmacy reports, pharmacy paging logs and solicited reports from nurses working on the study units and noted any adverse events or near misses. Four physician investigators, blinded to attending and intervention, classified each suspected incident as an adverse event, near miss or exclusion (an incident determined to be neither a medical error or adverse event). Physician reviewers further classified all adverse events as preventable or non-preventable. Medical Error rates are reports as number of events per 1,000 patient days

    9 months

  • Resident Engagement on Rounds: Educational Outcome

    Time motion study of the amount of time residents and faculty speak during rounds. Time was measured by a research assistant using a Microsoft access program embedded on an IPAD that recorded length of time. Time measurement outcomes are reported in minutes

    9 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Resident and Faculty Perception of Education, Educational Outcome

    9 months

  • Deaths, Patient Safety Outcome

    9 months

  • Transfers to the Intensive Care Unit, Patient Safety Outcome

    9 months

Study Arms (2)

Intervention Arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Attendings on the interventional arm attended daily work rounds with the resident teams in addition to established work rounds on the previously admitted patients on the care team.

Other: Enhanged Attending Supervision

Control Arm

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Attendings crossed over to the control arm in which they did not attend work rounds with the team and only say new admissions with the resident team. This was usual care.

Other: Standard of Care

Interventions

Attendings were randomized at the start of the study to begin in the enhanced supervision arm where they attended resident work rounds. They then crossed over to the control arm where they did not attend work rounds. The outcomes were assessed between the two periods during which the attending participated in the study; attending work rounds vs. not attending work rounds.

Intervention Arm

Attendings participated directly in new patient rounds but did not see patients previously known to the team with the residents.

Control Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Teaching attending on the medicine service at Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Resident physician on the medical service at Massachusetts General Hospital

You may not qualify if:

  • Faculty unable to complete both control and intervention arms of the study.
  • Faculty unwilling to participate
  • Residents unwilling to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Biondi EA, Varade WS, Garfunkel LC, Lynn JF, Craig MS, Cellini MM, Shone LP, Harris JP, Baldwin CD. Discordance between resident and faculty perceptions of resident autonomy: can self-determination theory help interpret differences and guide strategies for bridging the divide? Acad Med. 2015 Apr;90(4):462-71. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000522.

    PMID: 25340363BACKGROUND
  • Starmer AJ, O'Toole JK, Rosenbluth G, Calaman S, Balmer D, West DC, Bale JF Jr, Yu CE, Noble EL, Tse LL, Srivastava R, Landrigan CP, Sectish TC, Spector ND; I-PASS Study Education Executive Committee. Development, implementation, and dissemination of the I-PASS handoff curriculum: A multisite educational intervention to improve patient handoffs. Acad Med. 2014 Jun;89(6):876-84. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000264.

    PMID: 24871238BACKGROUND
  • Finn KM, Metlay JP, Chang Y, Nagarur A, Yang S, Landrigan CP, Iyasere C. Effect of Increased Inpatient Attending Physician Supervision on Medical Errors, Patient Safety, and Resident Education: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jul 1;178(7):952-959. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1244.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Standard of Care

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Quality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Study Officials

  • Kathleen Finn, MD

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: We conducted a 9-month randomized, cross-over trial on an inpatient medicine teaching service where 22 faculty provided either: 1) direct supervision where attendings joined work rounds on established (previously admitted) patients or 2) standard supervision where attendings were available, but did not join work rounds. Each faculty member participated in both arms in random order. The primary safety outcome was rate of medical errors. Resident education was evaluated via a time motion study to assess resident participation on rounds and surveys to measure resident and attending educational ratings.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Inpatient Associate Program Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2017

First Posted

October 23, 2017

Study Start

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion

June 1, 2016

Study Completion

April 1, 2017

Last Updated

October 23, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The data and results from the study are listed to the research personnel associated with the study.