Mesenteric Approach vs. Conventional Approach for Pancreatic Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
354
1 country
15
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the advantage of mesenteric approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The design of this study is multicenter randomized clinical trial, comparing oncological and surgical outcomes between mesenteric approach and conventional approach during PD for PDAC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Dec 2017
Typical duration for phase_3
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 23, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2021
CompletedOctober 24, 2017
October 1, 2017
4 years
October 18, 2017
October 21, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
overall survival
survival from surgery to death
up to 48 months
Secondary Outcomes (18)
operative time
up to 24 months
time for resection
up to 3 months
intraoperative blood loss
up to 3 months
blood transfusion volume
up to 3 months
grade B/C pancreatic fistula rate
up to 3 months
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
mesenteric approach
ACTIVE COMPARATORmesenteric approach starts from lymph node dissection around the superior mesenteric artery and performs Kocher's maneuver finally during pancreaticoduodenectomy.
conventional approach
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional approach starts from Kocher's maneuver and finally performs lymph node dissection around the superior mesenteric artery during pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Interventions
pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient who are scheduled to undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy for resectable or borderline resectable (only portal vein invasion) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
- Patients whose Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status are 0 or 1.
- Patients who are 20 years or older.
- Patients who have adequate organ function.
- Patients who understand sufficiently the study to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have severe ischemic cardiovascular disease
- Patients who have liver cirrhosis or active hepatitis
- Patients who need oxygen due to interstitial pneumonia or lung fibrosis
- Patients who receive dialysis due to chronic renal failure
- Patients who need surrounding organ resection
- Patients who need artery reconstruction
- Patients who are diagnosed as positive para-aortic lymph node metastases based on preoperative imaging
- Patients who have active multiple cancer that is thought to influence the occurrence of adverse events
- Patients who take steroid for the long period that is thought to influence the occurrence of adverse events
- Patients who undergo laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy
- Patients who cannot understand ths study due to psychotic disease or psychological symptoms
- Patients whose preoperative biopsy tissues are diagnosed as other pathological findings than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
- Patients who underwent gastrectomy or colon/ rectum resection previously
- Patients who have severe drug allergy to iodine and gadolinium
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (15)
Kyusyu University
Fukuoka, Japan
Kansai Medical University
Hirakata, Japan
Hiroshima University
Hiroshima, Japan
Shimane University
Izumo, Japan
Kagoshima University
Kagoshima, Japan
Nara Medical University
Kashihara, Japan
Kumamoto University
Kumamoto, Japan
Nagoya University
Nagoya, Japan
Osaka Medical University
Osaka, Japan
Osaka University
Osaka, Japan
Shiga Medical University
Ōtsu, Japan
Kinki University
Sayama, Japan
Tokyo Medical University
Tokyo, Japan
Toyama University
Toyama, Japan
Wakayama Medical University
Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan
Related Publications (2)
Hirono S, Kitahata Y, Motobayashi H, Satoi S, Sho M, Takami H, Kamei K, Shibuya K, Hidaka M, Uemura K, Kimura K, Mataki Y, Nagakawa Y, Hayashi H, Morimura R, Nakamura M, Wan K, Shimokawa T, Nakao A, Yamaue H; MAPLE-PD trial investigators. Mesenteric Versus Conventional Approach During Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (MAPLE-PD trial): A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006900. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 40772617DERIVEDHirono S, Kawai M, Okada KI, Fujii T, Sho M, Satoi S, Amano R, Eguchi H, Mataki Y, Nakamura M, Matsumoto I, Baba H, Tani M, Kawabata Y, Nagakawa Y, Yamada S, Murakami Y, Shimokawa T, Yamaue H. MAPLE-PD trial (Mesenteric Approach vs. Conventional Approach for Pancreatic Cancer during Pancreaticoduodenectomy): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 354 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Trials. 2018 Nov 8;19(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3002-z.
PMID: 30409152DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2017
First Posted
October 23, 2017
Study Start
December 1, 2017
Primary Completion
November 30, 2021
Study Completion
November 30, 2021
Last Updated
October 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share