A Study to Assess Therapeutic Equivalence Between Test EMLA Patch With Marketed EMLA Patch in Healthy Subjects.
EMLA
A Double-blind, Randomized, 2-period, Placebo-controlled, Single-center, Crossover Study to Assess the Therapeutic Equivalence of the EMLA Current Reference Patch and the EMLA Test Patch in Healthy Subjects.
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A double-blind, randomized, 2-period, placebo-controlled, single-center, crossover study, efficacy study demonstrating the therapeutic equivalence of the test cellulose disc (matrix) in EMLA patch and the current commercial cellulose disc (matrix) in EMLA patch in healthy subjects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1 pain
Started Oct 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 30, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 9, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 9, 2017
CompletedNovember 14, 2017
November 1, 2017
10 days
September 8, 2017
November 13, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of EMLA Test Patch with the marketed EMLA patch (EMLA current Reference Patch) by pain reduction assessment.
To compare the anesthetic efficacy in pain reduction after an intravenous needle insertion whether or not actual IV insertion was achieved will be evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS). The degree of pain experienced will be assessed on a 100 mm horizontal, non-graded paper-based VAS, with the endpoints representing "no pain" (0 mm), to "the worst possible pain" (100 mm). The VAS scores will be listed by subject, treatment sequence (TP/TR and TR/TP, where T=test, R=reference and P=Placebo), treatment (T, R and P) and hand (left, right).
At test procedure 1 and at test procedure 2 (which is after 4 days of washout period following test procedure 1).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants with Adverse events (AEs), skin sensation and reactions as variables of safety and tolerability.
From randomization until test procedure 2 or last study visit, whichever is later.
Study Arms (3)
Cohort 1
ACTIVE COMPARATOREMLA Test Patch.
Cohort 2
ACTIVE COMPARATOREMLA Reference Patch.
Cohort 3
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo patch.
Interventions
EMLA® Test Patch containing the active ingredients lidocaine base 25 mg/g and prilocaine base 25 mg/g in an oil-in-water emulsion saturating the absorbent cellulose disc. The source of cellulose for the cellulose disc will be provided from a new supplier in this test patch.
EMLA current Reference Patch, containing the active ingredients lidocaine base 25 mg/g and prilocaine base 25 mg/g in an oil-in-water emulsion saturating the absorbent cellulose disc.
Placebo Patch, based on the EMLA Test Patch (incorporating the absorbent cellulose disc with cellulose from the current supplier), where the absorbent disc will be saturated with a placebo oil-in-water emulsion, where the eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine is replaced with fractionated coconut oil and chlorhexidine digluconate 20%, with identical appearance to the active EMLA patches.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Provision of signed and dated, written informed consent prior to any study specific procedures.
- Healthy male and female subjects aged 18 to 60 years.
- Have healthy skin over hands, with no inflammation or open wounds.
- Able to understand, read and speak the German language.
- Easy accessible veins on the dorsum of both hands.
You may not qualify if:
- Current significant active skin disease such as widespread eczema or active atopic dermatitis.
- History of severe allergy/hypersensitivity or ongoing allergy/hypersensitivity, as judged by the PI, to local anesthetics of the amide type or to any of the components of the EMLA emulsion (e.g., castor oil polyoxyl hydrogenated).
- History of severe allergy/hypersensitivity or ongoing allergy/hypersensitivity, as judged by the PI to chlorohexidine (preservative in the placebo patch emulsion).
- Subjects who previously entered this study.
- Involvement of any AstraZeneca, PAREXEL or study site employee or their close relatives.
- Judgement by the PI that the subject should not participate in the study if they have any ongoing or recent (i.e., during the screening period) minor medical complaints that may interfere with the interpretation of study data or are considered unlikely to comply with study procedures, restrictions, and requirements.
- Vulnerable subjects, e.g., kept in detention, protected adults under guardianship, trusteeship, or committed to an institution by governmental or juridical order.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
- Parexelcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Research Site
Berlin, 14050, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr. med.Rainard Fuhr
PAREXEL Early Phase Clinical Unit Berlin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2017
First Posted
October 18, 2017
Study Start
October 30, 2017
Primary Completion
November 9, 2017
Study Completion
November 9, 2017
Last Updated
November 14, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share