Study Stopped
COVID-19 global pandemic, and study funding period ended 7/31/2020.
Vitamin D and n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFAs) to Prevent Chronic Pain Following Major Thermal Burn Injury
Pilot, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled, Multi-center Study of the Effects of Fish Oil and Vitamin D in the Prevention of Chronic Pain Following Major Thermal Burn Injury
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to develop a safe, effective, and readily available treatment that will prevent chronic pain following Major Thermal Burn Injury (MThBI). Burn survivors are prone to develop chronic pain and there is an urgent unmet need for preventative treatments. The preventative treatments proposed for this study, Omega-3 Fatty Acids (O3FA) and Vitamin D have been selected given effectiveness across a range of painful musculoskeletal disorders and their wide availability and low cost. This study is a 2x2 factorial, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial test for the effectiveness of O3FA and Vitamin D to prevent chronic pain development. Burn survivors will be enrolled who have experienced thermal burns that cover less than 30% total body surface area that are severe enough to warrant surgical management, which represents the most common burn injury characteristics. Patients will be enrolled within 72 hours of their burn, and randomized via 1:1:1:1 allocation to receive placebo, O3FA, Vitamin D or both. The investigators will obtain blood samples on enrollment and at 6 weeks to assist in elucidating key mechanisms by which O3FA and Vitamin D reduce chronic pain following MThBI. Chronic pain severity, assessed with a 0-10 numeric rating scale at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year will be entered into a repeated-measures model. Model estimated contrasts will serve as the primary outcome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Jul 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 26, 2021
CompletedMarch 17, 2025
March 1, 2021
2 years
September 20, 2017
April 29, 2021
March 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Qualitative Review of Treatment-Related Adverse Events
A primary objective of this pilot study is to ensure safety of both treatments as well as combined. A qualitative review of treatment-related adverse events will be performed and a determination about the degree of relatedness of each adverse event with the intervention using CTCAE criteria will be made as CTCAE criteria assesses relatedness to therapy. Investigator reviewing the details of each adverse event rated the likelihood of relatedness to the study drug on a scale: (unrelated, unlikely, possible, probably, definitely).
6 weeks following burn injury
Percent of Participants Who Are Compliant With Follow-up (Feasibility)
The primary objective of this pilot study is to ensure that the investigators are able to make follow-up assessments on a majority of participants. The percent of participants who are compliant with follow-up will be determined 6 weeks following major thermal burn injury. Feasibility is defined as \>80% of enrolled participants at 6 weeks following Major Thermal Burn Injury (MThBI).
6 weeks following burn injury
By Group Efficacy Estimates Over Year Following Thermal Burn Injury
Estimates of efficacy will be obtained via repeated measures analysis of pain severity over the 1 year following injury using mixed effects models. Pain will be assessed using a 0-10 numeric rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating pain as severe as you can imagine. Higher scores represent worse outcome. These values (collected in identical fashion over 1 year following burn injury) will be entered into a linear mixed model, and overall effect estimates (beta coefficients) among groups will be determined. Final model was a piece-wise linear mixed model, with a cut-point at 6 weeks. Mixed models were adjusted for age, sex, race, initial pain severity. Every 1 unit change in beta coefficient represents a 1 unit change in pain severity on the 0-10 numeric rating scale.
Over 1 year following MThBI
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Sex Differences in Treatment Response Based on Pain Scores
6 weeks following burn injury
General Mental Health as Measured by the Short Form (SF)-12 General Mental Health Component Scores
6 weeks following burn injury
General Physical Health by Treatment Group Measured by the SF-12 General Physical Health Component Scores
6 weeks following burn injury
Pain Interference by Treatment Group Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory
6 weeks following burn injury
Study Arms (4)
n-3 PUFA (O3FA) + Vitamin D3
EXPERIMENTAL4g fish oil in 4 softgels (n-3 PUFA/O3FA) + 2000 IU Vitamin D3 in 1 capsule
n-3 PUFA (O3FA) Placebo + Vitamin D3
EXPERIMENTAL4g of corn/soy oil blend in 4 softgels + 2000 IU Vitamin D3 in 1 capsule
n-3 PUFAs (O3FA) + Vitamin D3 Placebo
EXPERIMENTAL4g fish oil in 4 softgels (n-3 PUFA/O3FA) + Vitamin D3 matching Placebo, an inert white powder placebo in 1 capsule
n-3 PUFA (O3FA) Placebo + Vitamin D3 Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOR4g n-3 PUFA/O3FA Matching Placebo, a corn/soy oil blend in 4 softgels + inert white powder Vitamin D3 matching placebo in 1 capsule
Interventions
4 capsules comprising approximately 2 grams of Eicosapentaenoic acid/Docosahexaenoic acid (EPA/DHA) in a 3:2 ratio (this will require a total dose of 4 grams of fish oil). This will be administered daily, by mouth for 6 weeks
1 capsule containing 2000 IU of Vitamin D3. This will be administered daily, by mouth for 6 weeks following enrollment.
1 capsule containing inert substance. This will be administered daily, by mouth for 6 weeks following enrollment.
4g of corn/soy oil blend in 4 softgels. This will be administered daily, by mouth for 6 weeks following enrollment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 18 years and ≤ 65 years of age
- Admitted to burn center within 72 hours of thermal burn injury
- Estimated Total Body Surface area (TBSA) ≤ 30%
- Surgical team has plans for surgical management of the burn wound (e.g. xenograft and/or autograft).
- Patients experience a thermal burn injury, not an electrical or chemical burn.
- Has a telephone to receive follow-up calls.
- Able to speak and read English
- Resides within 150 miles of study site
- Alert and oriented
- Willing to take study medication for 6 weeks following enrollment
- Subjects are capable of giving informed consent.
- Predicted probability of chronic pain ≥ 0.3 when demographic parameters are entered into a logistic regression model developed from a previous cohort. (Initial pain score entered into this model will be based on the highest pain severity over the initial 24 hours of hospital admission).
- European American or African American
You may not qualify if:
- Unwilling to take study drug
- Allergy to fish oil or corn/soybean oil.
- Patient taking clopidogrel (Plavix)
- Patient taking warfarin or dabigatran.
- Substantial comorbid injury (e.g. long bone fracture)
- Pregnancy/Breastfeeding
- Prisoner status
- Chronic daily opioid use prior to burn (\>20 mg oral daily morphine equivalents).
- Active psychosis, suicidal ideation, or homicidal ideation
- Requires an escharotomy or fasciotomy for the treatment of burn injury.
- Has a disorder of pain processing or diminished capacity to perceive pain (congenital insensitivity to pain)
- Known Child-Pugh liver disease severity classification B or C.
- Known chronic kidney disease stage 4 or higher (GFR≤29).
- Known Hemophilia A/B
- Known bleeding dyscrasia
- +15 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27517, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Early termination because of pandemic delays
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Matt Mauck, MD, PhD
- Organization
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew C Mauck, MD, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double-blind
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2017
First Posted
October 18, 2017
Study Start
July 19, 2018
Primary Completion
July 31, 2020
Study Completion
July 31, 2020
Last Updated
March 17, 2025
Results First Posted
July 26, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- 12-36 months following publication
- Access Criteria
- Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC independently.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared on request provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina (UNC) independently.