Comparison of ACAF and ACCF in the Treatment of Cervical OPLL
ACAF
Comparison of Anterior Cervical Anteriodisplacement Fusion and Corpectomy Decompression Fusion in Treatment of Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Conservative Treatment- Controlled, Randomized, Open Label Clinical Study
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Dr. Shi recently proposed a new technique as Ossification of anterior decompression surgery, which is also called anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) , for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and cervical canal stenosis(CSS). Yet, the effectiveness and safety should be further studied. Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of clinical outcomes between ACAF surgery and Anterior cervical corpectomy decompression and fusion(ACCF)in patients with OPLL and CSS . A study hypothesis is that ACAF surgery outcomes will be equal even better and lower surgical complications which compared to ACCF surgery. Methods: This study is a randomized clinical trial with randomized, controlled, multicenter research design. The OPLL patients will be randomly assigned in one of the two treatment groups: ACAF surgery and ACCF surgery. Five outcome measures will be collected pre-operative for baseline, and then at1, 12, 24, 48, 96,240weeks post-operative follow-up visits, including: (1)JOA) .(2)VAS. (3)NURIC Graded .(4)NDI . (5) radiological parameter. After randomization, the ACAF group will receive anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion and the ACCF group will receive anterior cervical corpectomy decompression and fusion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2022
CompletedNovember 17, 2017
November 1, 2017
4 years
October 13, 2017
November 15, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes of patient-reported scores assessing improvement of spinal cord function underwent ACAF surgery compared to ACCF surgery
JOA total score up to 17 points, the lowest 0 points. The lower the score, the more obvious the dysfunction. Improvement index = post-treatment score - pre-treatment score, post-treatment score improvement rate = \[(post-treatment score - pre-treatment score) / 17 - pre-treatment score\] × 100%. By improving the index can reflect the improvement of patients before and after treatment and clinical efficacy. The improvement rate can also correspond to the commonly used efficacy criteria: cure is 100% improvement, improvement is greater than 60% effective, 25-60% is effective, and less than 25% is ineffective.
At 1 week pre- and 1, 12, 24, 48,96,240 weeks post-operative follow-up visits.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Changes of patient-reported scores assessing improvement of Walking function underwent ACAF surgery compared to ACCF surgery
At 1 week pre- and 1, 12, 24, 48,96,240 weeks post-operative follow-up visits.
Changes of patient-reported scores assessing improvement of pain underwent ACAF surgery compared to ACCF surgery
At 1 week pre- and 1, 12, 24, 48,96,240 weeks post-operative follow-up visits.
Changes of patient-reported scores assessing improvement of quality of life and cervical function underwent ACAF surgery compared to ACCF surgery
At 1 week pre- and 1, 12, 24, 48,96,240 weeks post-operative follow-up visits.
Changes of patient-reported scores assessing ossification and spinal cord forward distance underwent ACAF surgery compared to ACCF surgery
At 1 week pre- and 1, 12, 24, 48,96,240 weeks post-operative follow-up visits.
Study Arms (2)
ACAF surgery
EXPERIMENTALUnderwent anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion
ACCF surgery
PLACEBO COMPARATORUnderwentanterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion
Interventions
The main surgical procedures include discectomy of the involved levels, thinning of the anterior part of the involved vertebrae, intervertebral cages, anterior plate and screws installation, bilateral osteotomies of the vertebrae, and antedisplacement of the vertebrae-OPLL complex
Removal of the vertebral body,exposed ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament,and then removed
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients aged 45-70 years, without gender limitation, are willing to sign informed consent;
- patients diagnosed with posterior longitudinal ligament ossification of the cervical spine;
- patients with limbs numbness, walking instability, banding and other spinal cord, nerve root compression symptoms, may be associated with urinary dysfunction, conservative treatment is invalid or gradually increased;
You may not qualify if:
- Cervical ligamentous ossification, cervical trauma, cervical cancer, cervical tuberculosis and other inflammatory diseases;
- accompanied by thoracolumbar spine and other spine parts of the disease affect the clinical symptoms of patients;
- associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other motor neuron diseases and other neurological diseases;
- poor health condition, unable to tolerate surgery;
- patients (or their guardians) can not give full informed consent for adult dysfunction;
- patients who have participated in other clinical trials in the past 1 month
- patients with active hepatitis B (including HBeAg) or serological markers (HBsAg or / and HBeAg or / and HBcAb), hepatitis C, tuberculosis, cytomegalovirus infection, severe fungal infection or HIV infection;
- patients with active peptic ulcers within 3 months before randomization.
- patients with malignant neoplasms
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200001, China
Related Publications (1)
Chen Y, Yang L, Liu Y, Yang H, Wang X, Chen D. Surgical results and prognostic factors of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 7;9(7):e102008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102008. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25000183BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jiangang Shi
Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The statistical analysist do not know the group assignment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief of No.2 department of spinal surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 13, 2017
First Posted
October 18, 2017
Study Start
May 1, 2017
Primary Completion
May 1, 2021
Study Completion
January 1, 2022
Last Updated
November 17, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11