NCT03309410

Brief Summary

Objective: Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis is essential in the clinical assessment of potential acutely ill patients. Venous to arterial conversion (v-TAC), a mathematical method, has recently been developed to convert peripheral venous blood gas (VBG) values to arterialized VBG (aVBG) values. The aim of this study was to test the reliability of aVBG compared to ABG in an emergency department (ED) setting. Method: Twenty ED patients were included in this study. ABG and three aVBG samples were collected from each patient. The aVBG samples were processed in three different ways for comparison: aVBG1 was held steady and analysed within 5 minutes; aVBG2 was tilted in 5 minutes and analysed within 7 minutes; aVBG3 was held steady and analysed after 15 minutes. All VBG samples were arterialized using the v-TAC method. ABG and aVBG samples were compared using Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman's analysis.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2015

Typical duration for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2015

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 30, 2016

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2017

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 5, 2017

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 13, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

October 13, 2017

Status Verified

October 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

October 5, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 12, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Blood Gas AnalysisEmergency Service, HospitalVenous to arterial conversionMatched-Pair Analysis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

  • Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient

    Comparison of venous pH between glass and syringe samples.

    1 day

  • Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient

    Comparison of venous pCO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between glass and syringe samples.

    1 day

  • Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient

    Comparison of venous pO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between glass and syringe samples.

    1 day

  • Bland and Altman plot

    Comparison of venous pH between glass and syringe samples.

    1 day

  • Bland and Altman plot

    Comparison of venous pCO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between glass and syringe samples.

    1 day

  • Bland and Altman plot

    Comparison of venous pO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between glass and syringe samples.

    1 day

  • Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient

    Comparison of pH between aVBG and ABG.

    1 day

  • Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient

    Comparison of pCO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between aVBG and ABG.

    1 day

  • Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient

    Comparison of pO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between aVBG and ABG.

    1 day

  • Bland and Altman plot

    Comparison of pH between aVBG and ABG.

    1 day

  • Bland and Altman plot

    Comparison of pCO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between aVBG and ABG.

    1 day

  • Bland and Altman plot

    Comparison of pO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between aVBG and ABG.

    1 day

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Hemoglobin concentration

    1 day

Study Arms (2)

Pre-study

In the pre-study, venous samples were collected in paired 2 mL ABG syringes and 4.5 mL tubes from each of the 10 patients, to determine which blood collection method was preferred. VBG samples were collected via a butterfly needle with a three-way stopcock in conjunction with routine venous blood sampling upon admission. VBG samples were collected by the biomedical laboratory technician in the same manner as PVB samples in the normal clinical setting. Results from the pre-study were used to determine the preferred blood collection method in the main study. In this study, paired ABG and VBG samples were collected simultaneously from each of the 20 patients. The ABG samples were collected by the responsible physician. Allocation to either the pre-study or the main study was performed by simple quasi-random allocation in order of admission.

Diagnostic Test: Venous to arterial conversion (v-TAC)

Main study

In this study, paired ABG and VBG samples were collected simultaneously from each of the 20 patients. The ABG samples were collected by the responsible physician. Allocation to either the pre-study or the main study was performed by simple quasi-random allocation in order of admission. The clinical indication for ABG analysis was decided by the responsible physician in the ED upon patient admission and based on national guidelines and criteria.

Diagnostic Test: Venous to arterial conversion (v-TAC)

Interventions

This was an observational study. Paired arterial blood gas and venous blood gas was drawn from each patient and compared. Venous blood gas was converted to arterial blood gas values using v-TAC.

Main studyPre-study

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Circulatory stable patients needing ABG analysis for respiratory and metabolic assessment were selected randomly for participation in the study. Patients were considered circulatory stable if systolic blood pressure was above 90 mmHg and heart rate was 50 to 110 beats/min in accordance with Danish Emergency Process Triage (DEPT), which were used to triage patients upon admission. A total of 30 patients were included; 10 patients for a pre-study purpose and then 20 patients in the following main study.

You may qualify if:

  • Admission to the emergency department.
  • Need for ABG for respiratory or metabolic assessment.

You may not qualify if:

  • Circulatory unstable patients (systolic blood pressure \< 90mmHg og heart rate \<50beats/min or \>110beats/min).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (19)

  • Dar K, Williams T, Aitken R, Woods KL, Fletcher S. Arterial versus capillary sampling for analysing blood gas pressures. BMJ. 1995 Jan 7;310(6971):24-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6971.24. No abstract available.

    PMID: 7827548BACKGROUND
  • Matheson L, Stephenson M, Huber B. Reducing pain associated with arterial punctures for blood gas analysis. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Sep;15(3):619-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2013.06.001. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

    PMID: 24572291BACKGROUND
  • Leone V, Misuri D, Console N. Radial artery pseudoaneurysm after a single arterial puncture for blood-gas analysis: a case report. Cases J. 2009 Jul 21;2:6890. doi: 10.4076/1757-1626-2-6890.

    PMID: 19829877BACKGROUND
  • Dev SP, Hillmer MD, Ferri M. Videos in clinical medicine. Arterial puncture for blood gas analysis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 3;364(5):e7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMvcm0803851. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21288091BACKGROUND
  • Zavorsky GS, Cao J, Mayo NE, Gabbay R, Murias JM. Arterial versus capillary blood gases: a meta-analysis. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2007 Mar 15;155(3):268-79. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2006.07.002. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

    PMID: 16919507BACKGROUND
  • Ak A, Ogun CO, Bayir A, Kayis SA, Koylu R. Prediction of arterial blood gas values from venous blood gas values in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2006 Dec;210(4):285-90. doi: 10.1620/tjem.210.285.

    PMID: 17146193BACKGROUND
  • McCanny P, Bennett K, Staunton P, McMahon G. Venous vs arterial blood gases in the assessment of patients presenting with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;30(6):896-900. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

    PMID: 21908141BACKGROUND
  • Kelly AM. Can VBG analysis replace ABG analysis in emergency care? Emerg Med J. 2016 Feb;33(2):152-4. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204326. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

    PMID: 25552544BACKGROUND
  • Bloom BM, Grundlingh J, Bestwick JP, Harris T. The role of venous blood gas in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;21(2):81-8. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32836437cf.

    PMID: 23903783BACKGROUND
  • Rees SE, Toftegaard M, Andreassen S. A method for calculation of arterial acid-base and blood gas status from measurements in the peripheral venous blood. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2006 Jan;81(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Nov 21.

    PMID: 16303205BACKGROUND
  • Tygesen G, Matzen H, Gronkjaer K, Uhrenfeldt L, Andreassen S, Gaardboe O, Rees SE. Mathematical arterialization of venous blood in emergency medicine patients. Eur J Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;19(6):363-72. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834de4c6.

    PMID: 22082876BACKGROUND
  • Skriver C, Lauritzen MM, Forberg JL, Gaardboe-Poulsen OB, Mogensen CB, Hansen CL, Berlac PA. [Triage quickens the treatment of the most sick patients]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2011 Oct 3;173(40):2490-3. Danish.

    PMID: 21975184BACKGROUND
  • Toftegaard M, Rees SE, Andreassen S. Evaluation of a method for converting venous values of acid-base and oxygenation status to arterial values. Emerg Med J. 2009 Apr;26(4):268-72. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.052571.

    PMID: 19307387BACKGROUND
  • Collins JA, Rudenski A, Gibson J, Howard L, O'Driscoll R. Relating oxygen partial pressure, saturation and content: the haemoglobin-oxygen dissociation curve. Breathe (Sheff). 2015 Sep;11(3):194-201. doi: 10.1183/20734735.001415.

    PMID: 26632351BACKGROUND
  • Kelly AM, McAlpine R, Kyle E. Venous pH can safely replace arterial pH in the initial evaluation of patients in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2001 Sep;18(5):340-2. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.5.340.

    PMID: 11559602BACKGROUND
  • Ibrahim I, Ooi SB, Yiong Huak C, Sethi S. Point-of-care bedside gas analyzer: limited use of venous pCO2 in emergency patients. J Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.04.014. Epub 2008 Oct 18.

    PMID: 18930370BACKGROUND
  • Hedberg P, Majava A, Kiviluoma K, Ohtonen P. Potential preanalytical errors in whole-blood analysis: effect of syringe sample volume on blood gas, electrolyte and lactate values. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2009;69(5):585-91. doi: 10.1080/00365510902878716.

    PMID: 19396657BACKGROUND
  • Castagneto M, Giovannini I, Boldrini G, Nanni G, Pittiruti M, Sganga G, Castiglioni GC. Cardiorespiratory and metabolic adequacy and their relation to survival in sepsis. Circ Shock. 1983;11(2):113-30.

    PMID: 6416705BACKGROUND
  • Lauscher P, Lauscher S, Kertscho H, Habler O, Meier J. Hyperoxia reversibly alters oxygen consumption and metabolism. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:410321. doi: 10.1100/2012/410321. Epub 2012 May 1.

    PMID: 22623894BACKGROUND

Related Links

Biospecimen

Retention: NONE RETAINED

Blood

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Emergencies

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Erika Christensen

    Aalborg University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Peter Leutscher

    Center for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2017

First Posted

October 13, 2017

Study Start

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion

January 30, 2016

Study Completion

October 1, 2017

Last Updated

October 13, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Sensitive individual participant data (IPD) will not be available to other researchers. IPD will be kept in a secure personal drive within the regions server. All sensitive IPD will be anonymized before publication.