Mathematical Arterialization of Venous Blood Gas
Is Mathematical Arterialized Peripheral Venous Blood Gas Reliable Compared to Arterial Blood Gas? - a Clinical Validation Study
1 other identifier
observational
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Objective: Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis is essential in the clinical assessment of potential acutely ill patients. Venous to arterial conversion (v-TAC), a mathematical method, has recently been developed to convert peripheral venous blood gas (VBG) values to arterialized VBG (aVBG) values. The aim of this study was to test the reliability of aVBG compared to ABG in an emergency department (ED) setting. Method: Twenty ED patients were included in this study. ABG and three aVBG samples were collected from each patient. The aVBG samples were processed in three different ways for comparison: aVBG1 was held steady and analysed within 5 minutes; aVBG2 was tilted in 5 minutes and analysed within 7 minutes; aVBG3 was held steady and analysed after 15 minutes. All VBG samples were arterialized using the v-TAC method. ABG and aVBG samples were compared using Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman's analysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Sep 2015
Typical duration for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 13, 2017
CompletedOctober 13, 2017
October 1, 2017
5 months
October 5, 2017
October 12, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient
Comparison of venous pH between glass and syringe samples.
1 day
Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient
Comparison of venous pCO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between glass and syringe samples.
1 day
Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient
Comparison of venous pO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between glass and syringe samples.
1 day
Bland and Altman plot
Comparison of venous pH between glass and syringe samples.
1 day
Bland and Altman plot
Comparison of venous pCO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between glass and syringe samples.
1 day
Bland and Altman plot
Comparison of venous pO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between glass and syringe samples.
1 day
Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient
Comparison of pH between aVBG and ABG.
1 day
Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient
Comparison of pCO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between aVBG and ABG.
1 day
Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient
Comparison of pO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between aVBG and ABG.
1 day
Bland and Altman plot
Comparison of pH between aVBG and ABG.
1 day
Bland and Altman plot
Comparison of pCO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between aVBG and ABG.
1 day
Bland and Altman plot
Comparison of pO2 (Unit of Measurement: kilopascal) between aVBG and ABG.
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Hemoglobin concentration
1 day
Study Arms (2)
Pre-study
In the pre-study, venous samples were collected in paired 2 mL ABG syringes and 4.5 mL tubes from each of the 10 patients, to determine which blood collection method was preferred. VBG samples were collected via a butterfly needle with a three-way stopcock in conjunction with routine venous blood sampling upon admission. VBG samples were collected by the biomedical laboratory technician in the same manner as PVB samples in the normal clinical setting. Results from the pre-study were used to determine the preferred blood collection method in the main study. In this study, paired ABG and VBG samples were collected simultaneously from each of the 20 patients. The ABG samples were collected by the responsible physician. Allocation to either the pre-study or the main study was performed by simple quasi-random allocation in order of admission.
Main study
In this study, paired ABG and VBG samples were collected simultaneously from each of the 20 patients. The ABG samples were collected by the responsible physician. Allocation to either the pre-study or the main study was performed by simple quasi-random allocation in order of admission. The clinical indication for ABG analysis was decided by the responsible physician in the ED upon patient admission and based on national guidelines and criteria.
Interventions
This was an observational study. Paired arterial blood gas and venous blood gas was drawn from each patient and compared. Venous blood gas was converted to arterial blood gas values using v-TAC.
Eligibility Criteria
Circulatory stable patients needing ABG analysis for respiratory and metabolic assessment were selected randomly for participation in the study. Patients were considered circulatory stable if systolic blood pressure was above 90 mmHg and heart rate was 50 to 110 beats/min in accordance with Danish Emergency Process Triage (DEPT), which were used to triage patients upon admission. A total of 30 patients were included; 10 patients for a pre-study purpose and then 20 patients in the following main study.
You may qualify if:
- Admission to the emergency department.
- Need for ABG for respiratory or metabolic assessment.
You may not qualify if:
- Circulatory unstable patients (systolic blood pressure \< 90mmHg og heart rate \<50beats/min or \>110beats/min).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (19)
Dar K, Williams T, Aitken R, Woods KL, Fletcher S. Arterial versus capillary sampling for analysing blood gas pressures. BMJ. 1995 Jan 7;310(6971):24-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6971.24. No abstract available.
PMID: 7827548BACKGROUNDMatheson L, Stephenson M, Huber B. Reducing pain associated with arterial punctures for blood gas analysis. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Sep;15(3):619-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2013.06.001. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
PMID: 24572291BACKGROUNDLeone V, Misuri D, Console N. Radial artery pseudoaneurysm after a single arterial puncture for blood-gas analysis: a case report. Cases J. 2009 Jul 21;2:6890. doi: 10.4076/1757-1626-2-6890.
PMID: 19829877BACKGROUNDDev SP, Hillmer MD, Ferri M. Videos in clinical medicine. Arterial puncture for blood gas analysis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 3;364(5):e7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMvcm0803851. No abstract available.
PMID: 21288091BACKGROUNDZavorsky GS, Cao J, Mayo NE, Gabbay R, Murias JM. Arterial versus capillary blood gases: a meta-analysis. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2007 Mar 15;155(3):268-79. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2006.07.002. Epub 2006 Aug 17.
PMID: 16919507BACKGROUNDAk A, Ogun CO, Bayir A, Kayis SA, Koylu R. Prediction of arterial blood gas values from venous blood gas values in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2006 Dec;210(4):285-90. doi: 10.1620/tjem.210.285.
PMID: 17146193BACKGROUNDMcCanny P, Bennett K, Staunton P, McMahon G. Venous vs arterial blood gases in the assessment of patients presenting with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;30(6):896-900. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
PMID: 21908141BACKGROUNDKelly AM. Can VBG analysis replace ABG analysis in emergency care? Emerg Med J. 2016 Feb;33(2):152-4. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204326. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
PMID: 25552544BACKGROUNDBloom BM, Grundlingh J, Bestwick JP, Harris T. The role of venous blood gas in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;21(2):81-8. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32836437cf.
PMID: 23903783BACKGROUNDRees SE, Toftegaard M, Andreassen S. A method for calculation of arterial acid-base and blood gas status from measurements in the peripheral venous blood. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2006 Jan;81(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Nov 21.
PMID: 16303205BACKGROUNDTygesen G, Matzen H, Gronkjaer K, Uhrenfeldt L, Andreassen S, Gaardboe O, Rees SE. Mathematical arterialization of venous blood in emergency medicine patients. Eur J Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;19(6):363-72. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834de4c6.
PMID: 22082876BACKGROUNDSkriver C, Lauritzen MM, Forberg JL, Gaardboe-Poulsen OB, Mogensen CB, Hansen CL, Berlac PA. [Triage quickens the treatment of the most sick patients]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2011 Oct 3;173(40):2490-3. Danish.
PMID: 21975184BACKGROUNDToftegaard M, Rees SE, Andreassen S. Evaluation of a method for converting venous values of acid-base and oxygenation status to arterial values. Emerg Med J. 2009 Apr;26(4):268-72. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.052571.
PMID: 19307387BACKGROUNDCollins JA, Rudenski A, Gibson J, Howard L, O'Driscoll R. Relating oxygen partial pressure, saturation and content: the haemoglobin-oxygen dissociation curve. Breathe (Sheff). 2015 Sep;11(3):194-201. doi: 10.1183/20734735.001415.
PMID: 26632351BACKGROUNDKelly AM, McAlpine R, Kyle E. Venous pH can safely replace arterial pH in the initial evaluation of patients in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2001 Sep;18(5):340-2. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.5.340.
PMID: 11559602BACKGROUNDIbrahim I, Ooi SB, Yiong Huak C, Sethi S. Point-of-care bedside gas analyzer: limited use of venous pCO2 in emergency patients. J Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.04.014. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
PMID: 18930370BACKGROUNDHedberg P, Majava A, Kiviluoma K, Ohtonen P. Potential preanalytical errors in whole-blood analysis: effect of syringe sample volume on blood gas, electrolyte and lactate values. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2009;69(5):585-91. doi: 10.1080/00365510902878716.
PMID: 19396657BACKGROUNDCastagneto M, Giovannini I, Boldrini G, Nanni G, Pittiruti M, Sganga G, Castiglioni GC. Cardiorespiratory and metabolic adequacy and their relation to survival in sepsis. Circ Shock. 1983;11(2):113-30.
PMID: 6416705BACKGROUNDLauscher P, Lauscher S, Kertscho H, Habler O, Meier J. Hyperoxia reversibly alters oxygen consumption and metabolism. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:410321. doi: 10.1100/2012/410321. Epub 2012 May 1.
PMID: 22623894BACKGROUND
Related Links
Biospecimen
Blood
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Erika Christensen
Aalborg University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Peter Leutscher
Center for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2017
First Posted
October 13, 2017
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 30, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Sensitive individual participant data (IPD) will not be available to other researchers. IPD will be kept in a secure personal drive within the regions server. All sensitive IPD will be anonymized before publication.