Patient Compliance With Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Administration
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This a randomized control trial to identify if patients who desire LARC are more likely to have success receiving the desired form of contraception if it is placed a) during the postpartum hospital stay, either in the immediate or early postpartum period, versus b) during the interval postpartum period as previously done.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 22, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 21, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 9, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 22, 2021
CompletedJanuary 22, 2021
January 1, 2021
1.2 years
November 24, 2014
September 13, 2019
January 21, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Women With Placement of LARC
The outcome will be measured by the number of participants with LARC placement. The total number of women who expressed a desire to have postpartum contraception placed and randomized to the appropriate arm will be assessed.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient Satisfaction With Method of LARC Using LARC Survey
6 Weeks, 12 weeks postpartum, 6 months postpartum
Study Arms (2)
Immediate or early placement
EXPERIMENTALImmediate or early placement of levonorgestrel IUD, copper IUD, or etonorgestrel sub dermal implant (within 48 hours) postpartum
Interval placement
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterval (4-6 weeks) postpartum placement of levonorgestrel IUD, copper IUD, or etonorgestrel sub dermal implant
Interventions
Long-acting reversible contraception
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant, desires LARC postpartum
You may not qualify if:
- Medical contraindication to desired LARC, vaginal delivery complicated by fourth degree perineal laceration, history of pelvic inflammatory disease, uterine infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tulane Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70018, United States
Related Publications (9)
Brito MB, Ferriani RA, Quintana SM, Yazlle ME, Silva de Sa MF, Vieira CS. Safety of the etonogestrel-releasing implant during the immediate postpartum period: a pilot study. Contraception. 2009 Dec;80(6):519-26. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.05.124. Epub 2009 Jul 10.
PMID: 19913145RESULTCelen S, Sucak A, Yildiz Y, Danisman N. Immediate postplacental insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device during cesarean section. Contraception. 2011 Sep;84(3):240-3. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
PMID: 21843687RESULTChen BA, Reeves MF, Hayes JL, Hohmann HL, Perriera LK, Creinin MD. Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;116(5):1079-87. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f73fac.
PMID: 20966692RESULTDahlke JD, Terpstra ER, Ramseyer AM, Busch JM, Rieg T, Magann EF. Postpartum insertion of levonorgestrel--intrauterine system at three time periods: a prospective randomized pilot study. Contraception. 2011 Sep;84(3):244-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.007. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
PMID: 21843688RESULTGrimes DA, Lopez LM, Schulz KF, Van Vliet HA, Stanwood NL. Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12;(5):CD003036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003036.pub2.
PMID: 20464722RESULTGuazzelli CA, de Queiroz FT, Barbieri M, Torloni MR, de Araujo FF. Etonogestrel implant in postpartum adolescents: bleeding pattern, efficacy and discontinuation rate. Contraception. 2010 Sep;82(3):256-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.02.010. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
PMID: 20705154RESULTLevi E, Cantillo E, Ades V, Banks E, Murthy A. Immediate postplacental IUD insertion at cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study. Contraception. 2012 Aug;86(2):102-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.11.019. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
PMID: 22264666RESULTShukla M, Qureshi S; Chandrawati. Post-placental intrauterine device insertion--a five year experience at a tertiary care centre in north India. Indian J Med Res. 2012 Sep;136(3):432-5.
PMID: 23041736RESULTStuart GS, Bryant AG, O'Neill E, Doherty IA. Feasibility of postpartum placement of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system more than 6 h after vaginal birth. Contraception. 2012 Apr;85(4):359-62. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
PMID: 22067759RESULT
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Resident of OB/GYN
- Organization
- TulaneU
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sara Junya, MD
Tulane University School of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2014
First Posted
October 9, 2017
Study Start
October 22, 2014
Primary Completion
December 21, 2015
Study Completion
May 31, 2016
Last Updated
January 22, 2021
Results First Posted
January 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01