NCT03303430

Brief Summary

Microembolisation identified on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is recognized as an important outcome measure for carotid revascularization procedures such as carotid stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA). In fact, cerebral microembolisation occurring during revascularization procedures is associated with an increased risk of peri- and post-procedural stroke, transient ischemic attack as well as neurocognitive decline. Carotid artery stenting is a less invasive alternative to endarterectomy to treat symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Large randomized clinical trials showed a higher periprocedural risk of non-disabling stroke with CAS and a higher periprocedural risk of myocardial infarction, cranial nerve palsy, and access site hematoma with CEA. However little is known regarding the correlation between the morphological characteristics of the carotid plaque and the occurrence of microembolisation during the procedure and between microembolisation and midterm cognitive impairment. A few studies suggest that plaque morphology may be an important determinant for the increased risk of microembolisation. These studies however have mainly investigated microembolisation occurring during CAS and exploratory studies comparing the two procedures are still lacking. The purpose of the present study is to determine the correlation between the morphological characteristics of the carotid plaque and cerebral microembolisation either after carotid stenting or after carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 30, 2017

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 2, 2017

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 6, 2017

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 30, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 6, 2017

Status Verified

October 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

October 2, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 5, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

cerebral microembolisationplaque characteristics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cerebral microembolisation

    the presence of at least 1 new hyperintense DWI lesion on the MRI realized within the 24 hours after procedure and will be correlated to the different characteristics of the carotid plaque evaluation.

    24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Neuropsychological assessment

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Surgery group

This patient's group will benefit from a endarteriectomy in order to treat their carotid stenosis.

Diagnostic Test: MRI

Stenting group

This patient's group will benefit from a stenting of their carotid in order to treat their stenosis.

Diagnostic Test: MRI

Interventions

MRIDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Diffusion weighted imaging 24 hours after revascularisation

Stenting groupSurgery group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Screening of a carotid plaque is part of a routine procedure for patients admitted for stroke or TIA and includes ultrasound, CT-scan and MRI. Patients presenting a symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis are routinely discussed within a multidisciplinary meeting and the most appropriate therapeutic option is decided. For some patients, surgery and stenting are equivalent options. In that case, the patient may be a candidate for the present study

You may qualify if:

  • Patients presenting a symptomatic (ipsilateral ischemic stroke, TIA located in the carotid artery territory or retinal ischemia) carotid stenosis between 50% and 99% (according to NASCET and ECST criteria)
  • Patients presenting an asymptomatic carotid stenosis between 60% and 99% (according to NASCET and ECST criteria) Patients who accept the informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous known cognitive impairment
  • Pregnancy
  • Presence of contraindication based on ground of multidisciplinary team decision:
  • For surgery:
  • High bifurcation Intracranial extension of the carotid stenosis Patients with tandem lesions High suspicion of severe siphon stenosis Patients with previous irradiation of the cervical region Patients with restenosis after endarterectomy
  • For stenting; Excessive arch vessel or carotid artery tortuosity and in particular presence tortuosity ≤90 degrees in the cervical segment Excessive aortic arch plaque burden Patients older than 70 years Unfavourable anatomic disposition as described above Co-morbidities that may preclude the use of a periprocedural dual antiplatelet regime.
  • For CT-scan Iodine allergy Renal insufficiency
  • For MRI Pacemaker Any other metallic implants Claustrophobia
  • For ultrasound Bad quality ultrasound (patient morphology or equipments

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fisch Loraine

Geneva, 1205, Switzerland

RECRUITING

Related Publications (10)

  • Murad MH, Coto-Yglesias F, Zumaeta-Garcia M, Elamin MB, Duggirala MK, Erwin PJ, Montori VM, Gloviczki P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatments of varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 2011 May;53(5 Suppl):49S-65S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.02.031.

    PMID: 21536173BACKGROUND
  • Bonati LH, Fraedrich G; Carotid Stenting Trialists' Collaboration. Age modifies the relative risk of stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis--a pooled analysis of EVA-3S, SPACE and ICSS. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;41(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

    PMID: 21269847BACKGROUND
  • Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, Bravata DM, Chimowitz MI, Ezekowitz MD, Fang MC, Fisher M, Furie KL, Heck DV, Johnston SC, Kasner SE, Kittner SJ, Mitchell PH, Rich MW, Richardson D, Schwamm LH, Wilson JA; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):2160-236. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000024. Epub 2014 May 1.

    PMID: 24788967BACKGROUND
  • Bonati LH, Jongen LM, Haller S, Flach HZ, Dobson J, Nederkoorn PJ, Macdonald S, Gaines PA, Waaijer A, Stierli P, Jager HR, Lyrer PA, Kappelle LJ, Wetzel SG, van der Lugt A, Mali WP, Brown MM, van der Worp HB, Engelter ST; ICSS-MRI study group. New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS). Lancet Neurol. 2010 Apr;9(4):353-62. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70057-0. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

    PMID: 20189458BACKGROUND
  • Gensicke H, van der Worp HB, Nederkoorn PJ, Macdonald S, Gaines PA, van der Lugt A, Mali WP, Lyrer PA, Peters N, Featherstone RL, de Borst GJ, Engelter ST, Brown MM, Bonati LH; ICSS-MRI Substudy Investigators. Ischemic brain lesions after carotid artery stenting increase future cerebrovascular risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 17;65(6):521-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.038.

    PMID: 25677309BACKGROUND
  • Rothwell PM, Slattery J, Warlow CP. Clinical and angiographic predictors of stroke and death from carotid endarterectomy: systematic review. BMJ. 1997 Dec 13;315(7122):1571-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7122.1571.

    PMID: 9437274BACKGROUND
  • Biasi GM, Froio A, Diethrich EB, Deleo G, Galimberti S, Mingazzini P, Nicolaides AN, Griffin M, Raithel D, Reid DB, Valsecchi MG. Carotid plaque echolucency increases the risk of stroke in carotid stenting: the Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) study. Circulation. 2004 Aug 10;110(6):756-62. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138103.91187.E3. Epub 2004 Jul 26.

    PMID: 15277320BACKGROUND
  • Varetto G, Gibello L, Faletti R, Gattuso A, Garneri P, Castagno C, Quaglino S, Rispoli P. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict the risk of microembolization during carotid artery stenting. Radiol Med. 2015 Nov;120(11):1050-5. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0530-4. Epub 2015 Mar 25.

    PMID: 25805183BACKGROUND
  • Maggio P, Altamura C, Landi D, Migliore S, Lupoi D, Moffa F, Quintiliani L, Vollaro S, Palazzo P, Altavilla R, Pasqualetti P, Errante Y, Quattrocchi CC, Tibuzzi F, Passarelli F, Arpesani R, di Giambattista G, Grasso FR, Luppi G, Vernieri F. Diffusion-weighted lesions after carotid artery stenting are associated with cognitive impairment. J Neurol Sci. 2013 May 15;328(1-2):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.02.019. Epub 2013 Mar 17.

    PMID: 23510565BACKGROUND
  • Yun TJ, Sohn CH, Han MH, Yoon BW, Kang HS, Kim JE, Paeng JC, Choi SH, Kim JH, Chang KH. Effect of carotid artery stenting on cerebral blood flow: evaluation of hemodynamic changes using arterial spin labeling. Neuroradiology. 2013 Feb;55(3):271-81. doi: 10.1007/s00234-012-1104-y. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

    PMID: 23093072BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carotid Stenosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Carotid Artery DiseasesCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Loraine Fisch

    Junior consultant, neurovascular unit

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2017

First Posted

October 6, 2017

Study Start

March 30, 2017

Primary Completion

March 30, 2019

Study Completion

March 30, 2019

Last Updated

October 6, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations