Microembolisation After Carotid Revascularisation
Correlation Between Cerebral Microembolisation and Plaque Characteristics After Carotid Revascularization
1 other identifier
observational
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Microembolisation identified on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is recognized as an important outcome measure for carotid revascularization procedures such as carotid stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA). In fact, cerebral microembolisation occurring during revascularization procedures is associated with an increased risk of peri- and post-procedural stroke, transient ischemic attack as well as neurocognitive decline. Carotid artery stenting is a less invasive alternative to endarterectomy to treat symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Large randomized clinical trials showed a higher periprocedural risk of non-disabling stroke with CAS and a higher periprocedural risk of myocardial infarction, cranial nerve palsy, and access site hematoma with CEA. However little is known regarding the correlation between the morphological characteristics of the carotid plaque and the occurrence of microembolisation during the procedure and between microembolisation and midterm cognitive impairment. A few studies suggest that plaque morphology may be an important determinant for the increased risk of microembolisation. These studies however have mainly investigated microembolisation occurring during CAS and exploratory studies comparing the two procedures are still lacking. The purpose of the present study is to determine the correlation between the morphological characteristics of the carotid plaque and cerebral microembolisation either after carotid stenting or after carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 6, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2019
CompletedOctober 6, 2017
October 1, 2017
2 years
October 2, 2017
October 5, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cerebral microembolisation
the presence of at least 1 new hyperintense DWI lesion on the MRI realized within the 24 hours after procedure and will be correlated to the different characteristics of the carotid plaque evaluation.
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Neuropsychological assessment
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Surgery group
This patient's group will benefit from a endarteriectomy in order to treat their carotid stenosis.
Stenting group
This patient's group will benefit from a stenting of their carotid in order to treat their stenosis.
Interventions
Diffusion weighted imaging 24 hours after revascularisation
Eligibility Criteria
Screening of a carotid plaque is part of a routine procedure for patients admitted for stroke or TIA and includes ultrasound, CT-scan and MRI. Patients presenting a symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis are routinely discussed within a multidisciplinary meeting and the most appropriate therapeutic option is decided. For some patients, surgery and stenting are equivalent options. In that case, the patient may be a candidate for the present study
You may qualify if:
- Patients presenting a symptomatic (ipsilateral ischemic stroke, TIA located in the carotid artery territory or retinal ischemia) carotid stenosis between 50% and 99% (according to NASCET and ECST criteria)
- Patients presenting an asymptomatic carotid stenosis between 60% and 99% (according to NASCET and ECST criteria) Patients who accept the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Previous known cognitive impairment
- Pregnancy
- Presence of contraindication based on ground of multidisciplinary team decision:
- For surgery:
- High bifurcation Intracranial extension of the carotid stenosis Patients with tandem lesions High suspicion of severe siphon stenosis Patients with previous irradiation of the cervical region Patients with restenosis after endarterectomy
- For stenting; Excessive arch vessel or carotid artery tortuosity and in particular presence tortuosity ≤90 degrees in the cervical segment Excessive aortic arch plaque burden Patients older than 70 years Unfavourable anatomic disposition as described above Co-morbidities that may preclude the use of a periprocedural dual antiplatelet regime.
- For CT-scan Iodine allergy Renal insufficiency
- For MRI Pacemaker Any other metallic implants Claustrophobia
- For ultrasound Bad quality ultrasound (patient morphology or equipments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fisch Loraine
Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
Related Publications (10)
Murad MH, Coto-Yglesias F, Zumaeta-Garcia M, Elamin MB, Duggirala MK, Erwin PJ, Montori VM, Gloviczki P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatments of varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 2011 May;53(5 Suppl):49S-65S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.02.031.
PMID: 21536173BACKGROUNDBonati LH, Fraedrich G; Carotid Stenting Trialists' Collaboration. Age modifies the relative risk of stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis--a pooled analysis of EVA-3S, SPACE and ICSS. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;41(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
PMID: 21269847BACKGROUNDKernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, Bravata DM, Chimowitz MI, Ezekowitz MD, Fang MC, Fisher M, Furie KL, Heck DV, Johnston SC, Kasner SE, Kittner SJ, Mitchell PH, Rich MW, Richardson D, Schwamm LH, Wilson JA; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):2160-236. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000024. Epub 2014 May 1.
PMID: 24788967BACKGROUNDBonati LH, Jongen LM, Haller S, Flach HZ, Dobson J, Nederkoorn PJ, Macdonald S, Gaines PA, Waaijer A, Stierli P, Jager HR, Lyrer PA, Kappelle LJ, Wetzel SG, van der Lugt A, Mali WP, Brown MM, van der Worp HB, Engelter ST; ICSS-MRI study group. New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS). Lancet Neurol. 2010 Apr;9(4):353-62. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70057-0. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
PMID: 20189458BACKGROUNDGensicke H, van der Worp HB, Nederkoorn PJ, Macdonald S, Gaines PA, van der Lugt A, Mali WP, Lyrer PA, Peters N, Featherstone RL, de Borst GJ, Engelter ST, Brown MM, Bonati LH; ICSS-MRI Substudy Investigators. Ischemic brain lesions after carotid artery stenting increase future cerebrovascular risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 17;65(6):521-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.038.
PMID: 25677309BACKGROUNDRothwell PM, Slattery J, Warlow CP. Clinical and angiographic predictors of stroke and death from carotid endarterectomy: systematic review. BMJ. 1997 Dec 13;315(7122):1571-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7122.1571.
PMID: 9437274BACKGROUNDBiasi GM, Froio A, Diethrich EB, Deleo G, Galimberti S, Mingazzini P, Nicolaides AN, Griffin M, Raithel D, Reid DB, Valsecchi MG. Carotid plaque echolucency increases the risk of stroke in carotid stenting: the Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) study. Circulation. 2004 Aug 10;110(6):756-62. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138103.91187.E3. Epub 2004 Jul 26.
PMID: 15277320BACKGROUNDVaretto G, Gibello L, Faletti R, Gattuso A, Garneri P, Castagno C, Quaglino S, Rispoli P. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict the risk of microembolization during carotid artery stenting. Radiol Med. 2015 Nov;120(11):1050-5. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0530-4. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
PMID: 25805183BACKGROUNDMaggio P, Altamura C, Landi D, Migliore S, Lupoi D, Moffa F, Quintiliani L, Vollaro S, Palazzo P, Altavilla R, Pasqualetti P, Errante Y, Quattrocchi CC, Tibuzzi F, Passarelli F, Arpesani R, di Giambattista G, Grasso FR, Luppi G, Vernieri F. Diffusion-weighted lesions after carotid artery stenting are associated with cognitive impairment. J Neurol Sci. 2013 May 15;328(1-2):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.02.019. Epub 2013 Mar 17.
PMID: 23510565BACKGROUNDYun TJ, Sohn CH, Han MH, Yoon BW, Kang HS, Kim JE, Paeng JC, Choi SH, Kim JH, Chang KH. Effect of carotid artery stenting on cerebral blood flow: evaluation of hemodynamic changes using arterial spin labeling. Neuroradiology. 2013 Feb;55(3):271-81. doi: 10.1007/s00234-012-1104-y. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
PMID: 23093072BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Loraine Fisch
Junior consultant, neurovascular unit
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2017
First Posted
October 6, 2017
Study Start
March 30, 2017
Primary Completion
March 30, 2019
Study Completion
March 30, 2019
Last Updated
October 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share