NCT03301844

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of, and patient satisfaction with Blephapad Combo in the treatment of posterior blepharitis.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
19

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 15, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 2, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 4, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 9, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 9, 2018

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 19, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2019

Status Verified

November 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

August 2, 2017

Results QC Date

September 10, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 29, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage Change of the Total Score of the Grading Scales for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD)

    The total score of the meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) grading scale was automatically computed by the system as the sum of the six sub-scores (i.e. Lid margin findings of vascularity, Plugging of gland orifices, Lid margin irregularity, Lid margin thickening, Partial glands and Gland dropout), ranging from 0 to 15, where higher values rapresent a worse outcome. The first four parameters were evaluated using photographic images of anterior segments, while the last two were evaluated using infrared images of the meibomian glands Based on the percentage change from baseline to week 4 of the total score of MGD score, Investigators will choose which of the two eyes had a better change of clinical features.

    from baseline to week 4

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change of the Total Score of the Grading Scales for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (Improved vs Not Improved)

    From Visit 2 (baseline) to Visit 3 (week 4)

  • Number of Patients Preferring the Standard or the Study Treatment (i.e. Answers to a Specific Question on Patient Preference: Study Drug vs. Standard Treatment)

    at Visit 3 (week 4)

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Incidence of Ocular Adverse Events Reported Throughout the Study

    From Visit 2 (baseline) to Visit 3 (week 4)

  • Compliance to Treatment Evaluated by Counting the Applications (Wet Wipes) to Each Eyes

    From Visit 2 (baseline) to Visit 3 (week 4)

Study Arms (2)

Study treatment

EXPERIMENTAL

Blephapad Combo twice daily for one month. Blephapad is a disposable wet wipe containing Hy-Ter® solution (sodium hyaluronate acid and 4-terpineol), aloe, natural anti-inflammatories and antiseptics.

Combination Product: Blephapad Combo

Standard treatment

OTHER

Wet, warm gauze twice daily for one month.

Other: Standard treatment

Interventions

Blephapad ComboCOMBINATION_PRODUCT

Blephapad Combo is used to cleanse, soften, sooth and decongest inflamed eyelids and cilia. The combo also presents an applicator with a heatable tablet that is applied to the eyelid in order to clean and open occluded Meibomian glands, thereby allowing the production of lipids necessary for a healthy tear film. The heatable tablet is to be used prior to cleansing with Blephapad wipes.

Study treatment

Standard treatment, twice daily for one month, consisting in eyelid hygiene using wet, warm gauze.

Standard treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \> 40 years
  • Male or female
  • Diagnosis of bilateral posterior blepharitis
  • Written informed consent of patient

You may not qualify if:

  • Treatment with topical ophthalmic drugs (artificial tears allowed)
  • Ocular surgery in the previous 6 months
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Alcohol abuse
  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Cognitive impairment that could affect evaluation of preferences
  • Participation in other clinical studies in the last month
  • Hypersensitivity to one or more components of the study products

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

A.O.U. Policlinico Mater Domini

Catanzaro, CZ, 88100, Italy

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • De Luca V, Carnevali A, Carnovale Scalzo G, Piccoli G, Bruzzichessi D, Scorcia V. Efficacy and Safety of Wet Wipes Containing Hy-Ter(R) Solution Compared with Standard Care for Bilateral Posterior Blepharitis: A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019 Jun;8(2):313-321. doi: 10.1007/s40123-019-0182-x. Epub 2019 Mar 30.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Alessandro Colombo
Organization
NTC srl

Study Officials

  • Vincenzo Scorcia

    A.O.U. Policlinico Mater Domini

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: A randomized, controlled study with a closed sequential design
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2017

First Posted

October 4, 2017

Study Start

May 15, 2017

Primary Completion

February 9, 2018

Study Completion

February 9, 2018

Last Updated

December 19, 2019

Results First Posted

December 19, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-11

Locations