Early Coordinated Rehabilitation After Hip Fracture
1 other identifier
interventional
126
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background Studies have shown that patients with hip fracture treated in a Comprehensive Geriatric Care (CGC) unit report better results in comparison to orthopaedic care. Furthermore, involving patients in their healthcare by encouraging patient participation can result in better quality of care and improved outcomes. To our knowledge no study has been performed comparing rehabilitation programmes within a CGC unit during the acute phase after hip fracture with focus on improving patients' perceived participation and subsequent effect on patients' function. Method A prospective, controlled, intervention performed in a Comprehensive Geriatric Care (CGC) unit and compared with standard CGC. A total of 126 patients with hip fracture were recruited who were prior to fracture; community dwelling, mobile indoors and independent in personal care. Intervention Group (IG): 63 patients, mean age 82.0 years and Control Group (CG): 63 patients mean age 80.5 years. Intervention: coordinated rehabilitation programme with early onset of patient participation and intensified occupational therapy and physiotherapy after hip fracture surgery. The primary outcome measure was self-reported patient participation at discharge. Secondary outcome measures were: TLS-BasicADL; Bergs Balance Scale (BBS); Falls Efficacy Scale FES(S); Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Timed Up and Go (TUG) at discharge and 1 month and ADL staircase for instrumental ADL at 1 month.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2017
CompletedJanuary 6, 2020
January 1, 2020
10 months
September 22, 2017
January 3, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Self-rated degree of patient participation in rehabilitation
Patients answered 4 questions, specifically formulated for this study, regarding perceived level of participation in; their rehabilitation; working together with OT and PT in goal-setting; personal responsibility for their training, and making decisions regarding care and treatment as much as they liked. The questions were answered using a four level scale; very high degree, moderate degree, small degree or not at all.
At discharge from in-patienten rehabilitation, on average 14 days
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Traffic Light System - BasicADL (TLS-BasicADL)
At discharge from in-patient rehabilitation, on average 14 days and 1 month follow-up
ADL Staircase
At 1 month follow-up
Bergs Balance Scale (BBS)
At discharge from in-patient rehabilitation, on average 14 days and 1 month follow-up
Falls Efficacy Scale (FES-S)
At discharge from in-patient rehabilitation, on average 14 days and 1 month follow-up
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
At discharge from in-patient rehabilitation, on average 14 days and 1 month follow-up
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Enhanced collaboration
ACTIVE COMPARATOREnhanced OT and PT collaboration to promote patient participation. Goal setting using TLS-BasicADL protocol. Patients were encouraged to consider activities important to them to be able to perform at discharge. Adaption of goals throughout the hospital stay. Supporting patient self-efficacy: by challenging patients' fear of falling and encouraging progression of exercise. Training kit with instructions: To increase activity and encourage patients to take more responsibility for their training. Enhanced exercise with protocol: More intensive training of transfers, walking, balance and P-ADL was offered at least 3 times/day by OT and PT. Collaboration meetings: twice weekly interdisciplinary meetings plus daily OT and PT logistic meeting to schedule treatment.
Usual Care Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard rehabilitation
Interventions
Enhanced OT and PT collaboration: to promote patient participation. Goal setting using TLS-BasicADL protocol. Patients were encouraged to consider activities important to them to be able to perform at discharge. Adaption of goals throughout the hospital stay. Supporting patient self-efficacy: by challenging patients' fear of falling and encouraging progression of exercise. Training kit with instructions: To increase activity and encourage patients to take more responsibility for their training. Enhanced exercise with protocol: More intensive training of transfers, walking, balance and P-ADL was offered at least 3 times/day by OT and PT. Collaboration meetings: twice weekly interdisciplinary meetings plus daily OT and PT logistic meeting to schedule treatment.
The control group received standard rehabilitation from occupational therapists and physiotherapists (Monday to Friday), planned individually and gradually progressed for each patient. Mobilisation was initiated within 24 hours after surgery, 7 days a week. Patients were provided with a booklet with information about the fracture, operation method, exercise regime and assistive walking and ADL aid available.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- presenting with acute hip fracture
- aged 65 or more
- able to speak and understand Swedish
- community dwelling pre-fracture
- independent walking indoors with or without walking aid and in personal care with exception of bathing/showering.
You may not qualify if:
- severe drug or alcohol abuse
- mental illness
- documented cognitive impairment ≤ 8 according to the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Göteborg Universitylead
- Axel Linders Stiftelsecollaborator
- SKLs' äldresatsningcollaborator
- Local Research and Development Fund in Gothenburg and South Bohusläncollaborator
- Sahlgrenska University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal Hospital
Mölndal, 43180, Sweden
Related Publications (2)
Handoll HH, Cameron ID, Mak JC, Panagoda CE, Finnegan TP. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 12;11(11):CD007125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007125.pub3.
PMID: 34766330DERIVEDAsplin G, Carlsson G, Ziden L, Kjellby-Wendt G. Early coordinated rehabilitation in acute phase after hip fracture - a model for increased patient participation. BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 17;17(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0640-z.
PMID: 29041916DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lena Zidén, PhD
Göteborg University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 22, 2017
First Posted
October 4, 2017
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 30, 2014
Study Completion
June 30, 2014
Last Updated
January 6, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01