Lumbar Spine Surgery: Regional vs. General Anaesthesia
Effect of Anaesthetic Techniques on Clinical Outcome After Lumbar Spine Surgery: Regional Versus General Anaesthesia. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Lumbar spine surgery can be performed using different anaesthetic techniques such as general endotracheal anaesthesia (GA) or spinal-based regional anaesthesia (RA), that have different side effect profiles (e.g. opioids - nausea, vomiting, pruritus, sedation; local anaesthetics - motor weakness) which may affect quality of recovery in different ways. Aim of the study: The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of GA and RA in lumbar spine surgery on clinical outcome, combining validated patient-reporting instruments and morbidity such as serious adverse events. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery, RA shows significant advantages as compared to GA with respect to the postoperative pain score, the degree of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), the postoperative anaesthetic care unit (PACU) and anaesthesia time and the satisfaction of patients and surgeons. Design of the study: This is a single-centre two-arm randomised-controlled trail.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 19, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2017
CompletedOctober 3, 2017
September 1, 2017
1.4 years
September 27, 2017
September 27, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Morphine consumption
Cumulated morphine consumption in mg
From immediately after the operation until 48 hours postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (2)
VAS score
Postoperative at the day of surgery until 48 hours postoperative
Anesthesia time
Day of surgery
Study Arms (2)
General Anaesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORGeneral Anaesthesia during surgery
Regional Anaesthesia
EXPERIMENTALRegional Anaesthesia during surgery
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient must give informed consent before registration.
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Physical Status Classification of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Score (ASA) ≤ 3
- Patient with a diagnosed lumbar spinal stenosis or a herniated lumbar disc for elective neurosurgery
You may not qualify if:
- ASA ≥ 4
- Infection at the site of the operation field
- Longterm History (≥ 6 month) of neuropathic pain on the operation site
- Revision surgery and/or follow-up operations
- Severe coagulopathy (platelet count \< 100.000 / mL3 or Thromboplastin time \< 50%)
- Allergy to local anaesthetics or opioids
- Previous drug dependency or chronic use of opioids (≥ 6 month)
- Psychiatric disorder precluding understanding of information on trial related topics or given informant consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. Anna Hospital
Lucerne, CH - 6006, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
De Rojas JO, Syre P, Welch WC. Regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia for surgery on the lumbar spine: a review of the modern literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Apr;119:39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
PMID: 24635923BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bertram Bänziger, MD
Klinik St. Anna Luzern
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcomes Assessor and statistician are blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2017
First Posted
October 3, 2017
Study Start
January 19, 2016
Primary Completion
May 30, 2017
Study Completion
July 20, 2017
Last Updated
October 3, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09