Agili-C™ Implant Performance Evaluation
A Prospective Multicenter Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial of Agili-C™ vs. Surgical Standard of Care (SSOC) for the Treatment of Joint Surface Lesions of the Knee
1 other identifier
interventional
251
8 countries
26
Brief Summary
The current study compares the efficacy and safety of the Agili-C implant to Surgical Standard of Care treatment in patients suffering from joint surface lesions of the knee. The patient population is heterogeneous, involving different kinds of joint surface lesions: focal cartilage lesions, osteochondral defects and mild to moderate osteoarthritis, including multiple defects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
26 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 25, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 14, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 14, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 5, 2025
CompletedDecember 5, 2025
November 1, 2024
7.1 years
September 14, 2017
November 14, 2025
December 2, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Change From Baseline to 60 Months
Change from Baseline to 60 Months in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Overall Score measured by the five subscales of Pain (9 items), ADL function (17 items), Sport and Recreation Function (5 items), Symptoms (7 items), and Quality of Life (4 items). A Likert scale is used for all items with five possible answer options scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems). Each of the subscale scores are combined to calculate the KOOS Overall Score. The Overall Score is transformed to 0 to 100 scale, with 0 representing extreme knee problems (i.e., worse outcome) and 100 representing no knee problems (i.e., better outcome). The change from baseline score is reported as the mean of posterior distribution with 95% credible interval using the Bayesian model.
Baseline, 60 Months
Secondary Outcomes (26)
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Score Change From Baseline to 60 Months
Baseline, 60 Months
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Quality of Life (QOL) Score Change From Baseline to 60 Months
Baseline, 60 Months
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Score Change From Baseline to 60 Months
Baseline, 60 Months
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Symptoms Score Change From Baseline to 60 Months
Baseline, 60 Months
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Sports Score Change From Baseline to 60 Months
Baseline, 60 Months
- +21 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Agili-C
EXPERIMENTALSurgical Standard of Care (SSOC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years
- Up to 3 treatable joint surface lesion(s), ICRS Grade III or above, on the femoral condyles and/or trochlea
- Symptomatic total treatable area 1-7 cm2. Asymptomatic lesions will not be included in the calculation
- Must be physically and mentally willing and able to comply with the post-operative rehabilitation protocol and scheduled clinical and radiographic visits
- Signed and dated the IRB/Ethics Committee approved Informed Consent Form and HIPPA (if applicable)
- Non-responsive to physical therapy for at least 3-4 weeks
You may not qualify if:
- KOOS Pain Subscale score at baseline is less than 20 or more than 65 (scale: maximum pain =0, pain free =100)
- Bony defect depth deeper than 8mm, according to baseline MRI/X-ray/arthroscopy
- Articular cartilage lesions in the tibia or the patella, ICRS grades IVa or above
- Osteoarthritis of the index knee graded 4 according to the Kellgren-Lawrence Grading
- Significant instability of the index knee according to IKDC Knee Examination Form 2000, Grade C (abnormal) or D (severely abnormal)
- Malalignment more than 8 degrees varus OR 8 degrees valgus according to standing X-ray
- Lack of functional remaining meniscus, at least 5mm rim at the end of the procedure
- Meniscal transplantation in the past 6 months
- Any known tumor of the index knee
- Any known history of intra-articular or osseous infection of the index knee
- Any evidence of active infection anywhere in the body. Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) patients can be included following antibiotic treatment, and provided that two consecutive cultures are negative (taken within at least 2 weeks of each other)
- Any known history of inflammatory arthropathy or crystal-deposition arthropathy
- Any known systemic cartilage and/or bone disorder, such as but not limited to, osteoporosis, chondrodysplasia or osteogenesis imperfecta
- Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 35
- Chemotherapy in the past 12 months
- +14 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (26)
Horizon Clinical Research
San Diego, California, 91942, United States
LSU Healthcare Network Orthopedic & Sports Medicine
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
Peninsula Orthopaedic Associates
Salisbury, Maryland, 21804, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02467, United States
University of Missouri, Missouri Orthopaedic Institute
Columbia, Missouri, 65212, United States
NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital
New York, New York, 10003, United States
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Arlington Orthopedic Associates
Arlington, Texas, 76015, United States
OrthoVirginia
Richmond, Virginia, 23294, United States
AZ Monica
Antwerp, Belgium
Uzsoki Utcai Kórház
Budapest, 1114, Hungary
Kastélypark Klinika
Tata, 2892, Hungary
Assaf Harofeh Medical Center
Be’er Ya‘aqov, 60930, Israel
"Carmel" Medical Center
Haifa, 3436212, Israel
Hadassah Medical Center
Jerusalem, Israel
Hasharon Hospital, Petach Tikva
Petah Tikva, Israel
Souraski Medical Center
Tel Aviv, 6423906, Israel
Humanitas Gavazzeni
Bergamo, Italy
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano, Italy
Specialist Hospital. Louis Rydygier in Krakow
Krakow, Poland
County Hospital Timis Othopedy and Trauma Clinic
Timișoara, Romania
Atlas General hospital
Belgrade, Serbia
Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery "Banjica"
Belgrade, Serbia
Clinical Center of Vojvodina
Novi Sad, Serbia
Related Publications (2)
Kon E, De Caro F, Dasa V, M Scopp J, Di Matteo B, Flanigan D, Shabshin N, Strickland S, Altschuler N. Female patients report comparable results to males after the implantation of an aragonite-based scaffold for the treatment of knee chondral and osteochondral defects: a gender-based analysis of a RCT at 4 years' follow-up. J Orthop Traumatol. 2025 Mar 13;26(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s10195-025-00829-y.
PMID: 40080289DERIVEDAltschuler N, Zaslav KR, Di Matteo B, Sherman SL, Gomoll AH, Hacker SA, Verdonk P, Dulic O, Patrascu JM, Levy AS, Robinson D, Kon E. Aragonite-Based Scaffold Versus Microfracture and Debridement for the Treatment of Knee Chondral and Osteochondral Lesions: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2023 Mar;51(4):957-967. doi: 10.1177/03635465231151252. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
PMID: 36779614DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Manager Clinical Compliance
- Organization
- Smith+Nephew, Inc
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elizaveta Kon, MD
Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via A. Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milano, Italy
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Open-Label, adaptive design with interim analyses
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2017
First Posted
October 3, 2017
Study Start
September 25, 2017
Primary Completion
November 14, 2024
Study Completion
November 14, 2024
Last Updated
December 5, 2025
Results First Posted
December 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-11