PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN AMIODARONE Versus LIDOCAINE IN SVT
AMIOLIDO-VT
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction: Recent studies have suggested that other medications may be superior to amiodarone in controlling ventricular arrhythmias. However, a prospective and randomized comparison with lidocaine has not yet been described. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the use of amiodarone versus lidocaine in patients with stable ventricular tachycardias. Methodology: For this, a unicentric, randomized and prospective study will be carried out, in which the two drugs will be administered in a comparative manner. Hospital data (test results, medical outcomes, arrhythmia reversal, complications) of patients will be analyzed for safety and effectiveness. Expected results: The use of lidocaine is not inferior to amiodarone in the tolerability and reversion of stable ventricular tachycardias.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Aug 2017
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 2, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 2, 2022
CompletedOctober 24, 2018
October 1, 2018
2 years
September 27, 2017
October 23, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Signs of peripheral hypoperfusion and shock
hypoperfusion and shock
1 hour
Signs of pulmonary congestion
dyspnea, orthopnea, onset of pulmonary rales or drop in oximetry.
1 hour
Severe hypotension
systolic blood pressure \<70 mmHg if the previous one is \<100 mmHg or systolic blood pressure \<80 mmHg if the previous one is \> 100 mmHg).
1 hour
HR increase
HR increase\> 20 bpm.
1 hour
The appearance of polymorphic TV.
polymorphic TV.
1 hour
Lowering the level of consciousness.
glasgow \< 15
1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (2)
effectiveness of reversal
1 hour
time required for reversal
1 hour
Study Arms (2)
lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALInitial dose: antiarrythmic drugs Lidocaine (1.5 mg / kg EV in 30 minutes). Adittional dose: Lidocaine (0.75 mg / kg EV in 30 minutes).
amiodarone
EXPERIMENTALInitial dose: antiarrythmic drugs Amiodarone (5 mg / kg EV in 30 minutes) Adittional dose: Amiodarone (3 mg / kg EV in 30 minutes)
Interventions
Patient will be randomly randomized 1: 1 for the antiarrythmic drugs. If there is no reversal and there is no adverse event, a further dose of the same pre-administered medicinal product will be performed in another 30 minutes.
Patient will be randomly randomized 1: 1 for the the antiarrythmic drugs. If there is no reversal and there is no adverse event, a further dose of the same pre-administered medicinal product will be performed in another 30 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult men and women\> 18 years old
- Presence of sustained ventricular tachycardia with HR\> 120 bpm
- Systolic blood pressure\> 90 mmHg
- No signs of poor peripheral perfusion
- Absence of dyspnea
- Absence of severe angina
- Signed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Hemodynamic instability
- Body mass index greater than 40 kg / m2
- Use of intravenous amiodarone or lidocaine in the last 24 hours
- Acute coronary syndrome
- Presence of tachycardia with irregular or supraventricular RR
- Contraindications to study drugs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Instituto do Coração - HMFMUSP
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403000, Brazil
Related Publications (2)
Somberg JC, Bailin SJ, Haffajee CI, Paladino WP, Kerin NZ, Bridges D, Timar S, Molnar J; Amio-Aqueous Investigators. Intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous amiodarone (in a new aqueous formulation) for incessant ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Oct 15;90(8):853-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02707-8.
PMID: 12372573RESULTLink MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, Halperin HR, Hess EP, Moitra VK, Neumar RW, O'Neil BJ, Paxton JH, Silvers SM, White RD, Yannopoulos D, Donnino MW. Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S444-64. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000261. No abstract available.
PMID: 26472995RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexandre Soeiro, MD
Unidade Clínica de Emergência
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2017
First Posted
October 3, 2017
Study Start
August 2, 2017
Primary Completion
August 2, 2019
Study Completion
August 2, 2022
Last Updated
October 24, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10