Study Stopped
Low enrollment
SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System
MODUS II
A Single-Arm Prospective, Multi-Centered Study to Assess the SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System
1 other identifier
observational
232
2 countries
8
Brief Summary
This study is a single-arm, prospective, multi-center study to assess clinical performance of the SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System (TCS) with MODUS II software for confirming correct tip position of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in adult subjects with altered cardiac rhythm.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2018
Typical duration for all trials
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2021
CompletedOctober 20, 2021
January 1, 2021
3.2 years
September 18, 2017
October 12, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of successful PICC tip placement within the lower third of the superior vena cava (SVC) or in the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) using SLM2
Tip positioning is determined at bedside by the software via the Green Diamond Indicator (GDI+) and confirmed by CXR. PICC tip placement will be considered successful if it is determined to be in the lower 1/3 of the SVC or in the CAJ by an independent, blinded radiologist judging position retrospectively against pre-specified anatomical criteria.
The PICC insertion procedure is 60-90 mins in duration
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Rate of successful PICC tip placement within the lower third of the superior vena cava (SVC) or in the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) using SLM2 in the absence of a GDI
The PICC insertion procedure is 60-90 mins in duration
Percent agreement between the site readings of the CXR (standard of care) versus those completed by an independent, blinded radiologist
The PICC insertion procedure is 60-90 mins in duration
Study Arms (1)
PICC Placement with Study Device
PICC Placement with SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond TCS with MODUS II software
Interventions
The SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System (TCS) is an FDA-cleared fully-integrated magnetic tracking and ECG-based PICC tip confirmation technology, indicated for use as an alternative to chest x-ray and fluoroscopy for PICC tip placement confirmation in adult patients without any alterations of cardiac rhythms that change the normal presentation of the P-wave. A software package, MODUS II, has been developed to accurately analyze the entire ECG complex and identify the correct placement of the PICC tip based on a patient's individual ECG, in the absence of an easily identifiable P-wave. This software system is designed to provide visual and/or audio cues to notify the PICC placer of the location of the PICC tip relative to the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) of the patient.
Eligibility Criteria
Subjects will be adult males or females ≥ 21 years of age with identifiable alterations of cardiac rhythm. For this study, altered cardiac rhythm is defined as any condition that does not have a P-wave on ECG.
You may qualify if:
- Male or female, ≥ 21 years of age with altered cardiac rhythm (no recognizable P-wave on standard ECG) with diagnosis of specific arrhythmia type or identification of pacemaker driven rhythms as defined below:
- Atrial fibrillation with history of diagnosis per 12-lead ECG in medical record or diagnosed via bedside telemetry by study team RN at assessment, or
- All other arrhythmias (including but not limited to atrial flutter, PAC, PVC, PJC, tachycardia, AV Block, BB Block) with history of diagnosis per 12-lead ECG in medical record or diagnosed via bedside telemetry by cardiac unit RN at assessment, or retrospectively by site cardiologist, or
- Pacemaker driven rhythm with temporary or permanent pacemaker device in place;
- Subject requires PICC placement as part of standard of care;
- Subject or Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) has signed an Informed Consent Form (ICF).
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has a contraindication to PICC placement as listed in the Instructions for Use (IFU) to include:
- The presence of bacteremia or septicemia (known or suspected),
- The patient's body size is insufficient to accommodate the size of the implanted device,
- The patient is known or is suspected to be allergic to materials contained in the device,
- Past irradiation of prospective insertion site,
- Previous episodes of venous thrombosis or vascular surgical procedures at the prospective placement site,
- Local tissue factors will prevent proper device stabilization and/or access;
- Subjects who previously had a PICC in place and require a PICC exchange;
- Subject has presence of active resting tremor (i.e. Parkinson's, Multiple Sclerosis, etc.) deemed by Investigator to have potential impact on procedure accuracy;
- Subjects who are pregnant or think they may be pregnant.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- C. R. Bardlead
Study Sites (8)
Summerlin Hospital and Medical Center
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89144, United States
Moses Cone Hospital
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401, United States
Vidant Medical Center
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center
Spokane, Washington, 99204, United States
J.W. Ruby Memorial Hospital
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505, United States
Sunshine Coast University Hospital
Birtinya, Queensland, 4575, Australia
Fiona Stanley Hospital
Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Rushil Sankpal
Becton Dickinson
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2017
First Posted
September 20, 2017
Study Start
April 19, 2018
Primary Completion
June 15, 2021
Study Completion
June 15, 2021
Last Updated
October 20, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share