Anti-FLEX: Flexed Levering of Gluteal Vessels
1 other identifier
observational
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the gluteal vasculature in the prone and jackknife positions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started May 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 3, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 21, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 13, 2020
CompletedFebruary 28, 2020
February 1, 2020
7 months
September 14, 2017
February 27, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean difference of position of the gluteal venous vasculature in relation to the skin
Between the Prone position and the Jackknife position
at CT scan visit
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Mean difference of vessel diameter of the gluteal venous vasculature
at CT scan visit
Mean difference of the danger zone
at CT scan visit
Study Arms (1)
Healthy volunteers
Healthy volunteers who will undergo contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the gluteal venous vasculature in the prone and jackknife positions
Interventions
Contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the pelvis in prone and jackknife positions
Eligibility Criteria
Healthy volunteers who will undergo contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the gluteal venous vasculature in the prone and jackknife positions
You may qualify if:
- Females age 20 - 50 years
- BMI between 20 - 35 kg/m2
- Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent
- Willingness and ability to comply with all study procedures
- Interested or planning to have a gluteal augmentation
You may not qualify if:
- Males
- Females age \< 20 or \>= 51 years
- BMI between \< 20 or \> 35 kg/m2
- Prior gluteal augmentation surgery
- Any prior gluteal soft tissue filler
- Known or suspected history of immediate or delayed hypersensitivity (including but not limited to hives, anaphylactoid or cardiovascular reactions, laryngeal edema, and bronchospasm) to iodine or any iodinated contrast medium
- Documented history of chronic kidney disease that contraindicates the use of contrast dye
- Pregnant
- Currently breast-feeding
- Any reason (in addition to those listed above) that, in the opinion of the principal investigator, precludes full participation in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
Related Publications (9)
Illouz YG. The fat cell "graft": a new technique to fill depressions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Jul;78(1):122-3. No abstract available.
PMID: 3725947BACKGROUNDHsu VM, Stransky CA, Bucky LP, Percec I. Fat grafting's past, present, and future: why adipose tissue is emerging as a critical link to the advancement of regenerative medicine. Aesthet Surg J. 2012 Sep;32(7):892-9. doi: 10.1177/1090820X12455658.
PMID: 22942117BACKGROUNDCardenas-Camarena L, Arenas-Quintana R, Robles-Cervantes JA. Buttocks fat grafting: 14 years of evolution and experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Aug;128(2):545-555. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821b640b.
PMID: 21788847BACKGROUNDToledo LS. Gluteal augmentation with fat grafting: the Brazilian buttock technique: 30 years' experience. Clin Plast Surg. 2015 Apr;42(2):253-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2014.12.004.
PMID: 25827567BACKGROUNDLINCOLN JR, SAWYER HP Jr. Complications related to body positions during surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 1961 Sep-Oct;22:800-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-196109000-00014. No abstract available.
PMID: 14465376BACKGROUNDAstarita DC, Scheinin LA, Sathyavagiswaran L. Fat transfer and fatal macroembolization. J Forensic Sci. 2015 Mar;60(2):509-10. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12549. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
PMID: 25653075BACKGROUNDMofid MM, Teitelbaum S, Suissa D, Ramirez-Montanana A, Astarita DC, Mendieta C, Singer R. Report on Mortality from Gluteal Fat Grafting: Recommendations from the ASERF Task Force. Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Jul 1;37(7):796-806. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx004.
PMID: 28369293RESULTKlein SM, Prantl L, Geis S, Eisenmann-Klein M, Dolderer J, Felthaus O, Loibl M, Heine N. Pressure monitoring during lipofilling procedures. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2014;58(1):9-17. doi: 10.3233/CH-141872.
PMID: 25227189RESULTKatayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology. 1990 Jun;175(3):621-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.175.3.2343107.
PMID: 2343107RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Connor Barnes, MD
University of South Florida
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2017
First Posted
September 18, 2017
Study Start
May 3, 2018
Primary Completion
November 21, 2018
Study Completion
January 13, 2020
Last Updated
February 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share