NCT03285828

Brief Summary

Objective is to evaluate the impact of a basic training programme in motivational interviewing (MI) for medical students, by comparing the ability of students to promote behavioural changes through relationship skills and to conduct a motivational interview before and after training.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 4, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2016

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 8, 2017

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 18, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

September 18, 2017

Status Verified

September 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

September 8, 2017

Last Update Submit

September 15, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

medical education, motivational interviewing, medical empathy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • GLOBAL MITI scores (MITI = Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity version 3.1.1)

    Global scores by two independent raters who used the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) 3.1.1 code

    15 mn

  • perception of student's empathy by the caregivers

    CARE questionnaire (CARE = The Consultation And Relational Empathy questionnaire)

    15 mn

  • self-efficacy of students to engage in a patient-centred relationship

    SEPCQ score (SEPCQ = The self-efficacy in patient-centeredness score)

    15 mn

  • student's satisfaction with the odds of achieving the target goal.

    specific questionnary (Analog scale of satisfaction from 1 (not satisfied) to 10 (very statisfied))

    15 mn

Study Arms (2)

First group

OTHER

Students received three four-hour sessions of a basic motivationnal interviewing training over a one week period. The students interviewed for 15 minutes a caregiver playing the role of a patient, six weeks before and three weeks after the training.

Behavioral: motivationnal interviewing training

Second group

OTHER

Students received three four-hour sessions of a basic motivationnal interviewing training over a one week period. The students interviewed for 15 minutes a caregiver playing the role of a patient, six weeks before and three weeks after the training.

Behavioral: motivationnal interviewing training

Interventions

The students received three four-hour sessions of basic motivationnal interviewing training : 1. Viewing and commenting on video clips illustrating motivational and non-motivational doctor-patient interactions. 2. Lectures and the distribution of memory aids. 3. Practical exercises: making "reflections", asking open questions; exploring ambivalence; dealing with resistance; expressing empathy, summarising. 4. Role-playing, based on several situations, each involving two students. The investigators deliberately chose a non-medical situation (conflict between a mother and a student asking her for pocket money to go out for fun, the day before a university examination) for the first situation. All the other situations concerned changes to healthier behaviour in a medical setting, but with a goal different from that used for the first or the second simulated interview before motivationnal interviewing training.

First groupSecond group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Students in clinical internships (fourth or fifth year of medical courses) in the Immunology-Infection-Inflammation-Endocrinology Division of Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris.
  • signed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • participation refused
  • prior training in motivational interviewing

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Rollnick S, Butler CC, Kinnersley P, Gregory J, Mash B. Motivational interviewing. BMJ. 2010 Apr 27;340:c1900. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1900. No abstract available.

    PMID: 20423957BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • ANTOINE CHERET

    Bicetre Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A pilot pre-post study investigating the effects of a training programme, by comparing performance before and after its implementation
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctor ANTOINE CHERET

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2017

First Posted

September 18, 2017

Study Start

April 4, 2016

Primary Completion

June 30, 2016

Study Completion

June 30, 2016

Last Updated

September 18, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share