Split Scar Study to Assess Cosmetic Outcome From Differing Suture Spacing
SFD
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators wish to determine how suture spacing (5 mm vs. 10 mm) affects cosmetic outcome and development of "train tracking" in wounds. Linear wounds with sutures spaced closer together may not be as cosmetically appealing when compared to those that have larger spacing between sutures. Suturing closer together constricts blood flow and increases tension that ultimately results in more tissue necrosis and a less appealing outcome. The investigators also aim to conclude if 5 mm or 10 mm suture spacing results in less complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2017
CompletedSeptember 15, 2017
September 1, 2017
3 months
September 11, 2017
September 12, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in cosmetic outcome of 5 mm versus 10 mm suture spacing on wound healing
The wound was divided in half by placing a single 4-0 Polysorb suture in the midpoint of the wound based on ruler measurement. Simple interrupted nylon sutures were spaced approximately 5mm or 10mm apart depending on side. The sutures were then removed at 2-week follow-up appointment. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was then performed by both patient and physician. The observer scale consists of six items (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability and surface area), and all items were scored on a scale from 1 ('like normal skin') to 10 ('worst scar imaginable'). The patient scale also includes six items (color, itch, pain, thickness, stiffness, and irregularity) and all items were scored on a similar scale from 1 ('like normal skin') to 10 ('worst scar imaginable').
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in wound complications of 5 mm versus 10 mm suture spacing on wound healing
2 weeks
Study Arms (1)
10 mm suture spacing
EXPERIMENTALThe investigators aim to determine how suture spacing affects cosmetic outcome of wound healing. One side (1/2 of the wound length) was sutured with 10 mm suture spacing
Interventions
The wound was divided in half and sutures were spaced 5mm or 10mm apart depending on side. The sutures were removed at 2-week follow-up appointment and photographs were taken. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was then performed by both patient and physician.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female patients, at least 18 years of age, undergoing surgical excision of biopsy-proven skin cancers on the trunk or extremities at Silver Falls Dermatology \& Allergy outpatient clinic in Salem, Oregon. Patients with elliptical excisions with length greater than 4.0 centimeters were included.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with prior scars within 2.5cm of the proposed elliptical excision, failure to comply with wound care instructions or failure to follow up.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Silver Falls Dermatologylead
- Samaritan Health Servicescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Silver Falls Dermatology
Salem, Oregon, 97302, United States
Related Publications (5)
Dumville JC, Coulthard P, Worthington HV, Riley P, Patel N, Darcey J, Esposito M, van der Elst M, van Waes OJ. Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 28;2014(11):CD004287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004287.pub4.
PMID: 25431843BACKGROUNDBloemen MC, van Gerven MS, van der Wal MB, Verhaegen PD, Middelkoop E. An objective device for measuring surface roughness of skin and scars. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Apr;64(4):706-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.03.006. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
PMID: 21216493BACKGROUNDSagi HC, Papp S, Dipasquale T. The effect of suture pattern and tension on cutaneous blood flow as assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry in a pig model. J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Mar;22(3):171-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318169074c.
PMID: 18317050BACKGROUNDBraverman IM, Keh A, Goldminz D. Correlation of laser Doppler wave patterns with underlying microvascular anatomy. J Invest Dermatol. 1990 Sep;95(3):283-6. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12484917.
PMID: 2143522BACKGROUNDShin TM, Bordeaux JS. How suture technique affects the cosmetic outcome of cutaneous repairs. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014 Aug;13(8):967-9.
PMID: 25116976RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
William Lear, MD
Silver Falls Dermatology
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2017
First Posted
September 15, 2017
Study Start
July 1, 2017
Primary Completion
October 1, 2017
Study Completion
October 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 15, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09