NCT03279705

Brief Summary

This prospective randomized controlled trial compared integrated water jet channel colonoscopy with traditional accessory channel colonoscopy in cecal insertion time among patients undergoing WE method colonoscopy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 24, 2017

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 12, 2017

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2019

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 29, 2019

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

August 24, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 25, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

water exchangewater jet channel colonoscopycolonoscopycecal insertion timeadenoma detection rate

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • cecal insertion time

    Cecal insertion time was defined as the time from insertion into the rectum to the time when the colonoscope tip passed to a point proximal to the ileocecal valve so that the base of cecum was visible.

    2 hours

Study Arms (2)

Two-channel group

EXPERIMENTAL

The colonoscopy was done with the new designed colonoscopy that integrated a separate water jet channel for infusing water. The dirty water was removed through other accessory channel.

Device: Water jet channelDevice: Accessory channel

One-channel group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The colonoscopy was done with the traditional colonoscopy. Water exchange was done by using the accessory channel for both infusing and suctioning of water.

Device: Accessory channel

Interventions

The separate water jet channel was used for infusing water.

Two-channel group

The accessory channel was used for infusing and/or suctioning water

One-channel groupTwo-channel group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Underwent fully sedative colonoscopy with WE method in the outpatient department

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \< 18 years old or \> 80 years old
  • Without standard colon preparation
  • Allergy to meperidine or propofol
  • With a history of partial colectomy
  • Refusal to provide written informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation

Taipei, 62247, Taiwan

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Tseng CW, Koo M, Hsieh YH. Cecal intubation time between the use of one-channel and two-channel water exchange colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Sep;35(9):1562-1569. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15043. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colonic Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Yu-Hsi Hsieh

    Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
These codes were contained in pre-arranged opaque envelopes, which were opened immediately before insertion of the colonoscope.
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A total of 120 patients were allocated into one of two groups by computerized randomization. In group A (Two-channel group), clear water was infused through the water jet channel and dirty water was sucked form the accessy channel. In group B (One-channel group), water exchange was done by using the accessory channel for both infusing and suctioning of water.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2017

First Posted

September 12, 2017

Study Start

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion

April 1, 2019

Study Completion

October 1, 2019

Last Updated

October 29, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations