The efficacy of the Integrated Water Jet Channel Colonoscopy in Water Exchange Method
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective randomized controlled trial compared integrated water jet channel colonoscopy with traditional accessory channel colonoscopy in cecal insertion time among patients undergoing WE method colonoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 12, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2019
CompletedOctober 29, 2019
October 1, 2019
1.9 years
August 24, 2017
October 25, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
cecal insertion time
Cecal insertion time was defined as the time from insertion into the rectum to the time when the colonoscope tip passed to a point proximal to the ileocecal valve so that the base of cecum was visible.
2 hours
Study Arms (2)
Two-channel group
EXPERIMENTALThe colonoscopy was done with the new designed colonoscopy that integrated a separate water jet channel for infusing water. The dirty water was removed through other accessory channel.
One-channel group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe colonoscopy was done with the traditional colonoscopy. Water exchange was done by using the accessory channel for both infusing and suctioning of water.
Interventions
The accessory channel was used for infusing and/or suctioning water
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Underwent fully sedative colonoscopy with WE method in the outpatient department
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years old or \> 80 years old
- Without standard colon preparation
- Allergy to meperidine or propofol
- With a history of partial colectomy
- Refusal to provide written informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chih-wei Tsenglead
Study Sites (1)
Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation
Taipei, 62247, Taiwan
Related Publications (1)
Tseng CW, Koo M, Hsieh YH. Cecal intubation time between the use of one-channel and two-channel water exchange colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Sep;35(9):1562-1569. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15043. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
PMID: 32203986DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yu-Hsi Hsieh
Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- These codes were contained in pre-arranged opaque envelopes, which were opened immediately before insertion of the colonoscope.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2017
First Posted
September 12, 2017
Study Start
May 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 1, 2019
Study Completion
October 1, 2019
Last Updated
October 29, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share