NCT03278353

Brief Summary

A total of 63 participants will be recruited through 3 local surgeons in Durham, North Carolina after distinctive differential diagnostic methods, all with extensive expertise in intra-articular hip pathology and arthroscopy. The surgeons will offer the opportunity to participate in the trial by providing information to the recipient. Potential participants that do not contact project team members will be contacted by phone if they do not respond to the initial invitation. Potential participants will be initially screened by telephone interview, followed by a clinical examination to confirm study eligibility. The blinded researchers will obtain informed consent and will perform outcome assessments Purpose of the Study: 1) measure the mediating effect of baseline patient expectations on fulfillment of expectations (for both conservative care and surgery, measured at 6 weeks and at 1 year respectively) in a cohort of patients with a diagnosis of FAI Syndrome who receive six weeks of conservative physical therapy intervention and 2) measure the effect of baseline expectations on patient reported outcomes (e.g., HAGOS, pain, global rating of change) at six weeks.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
6

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 5, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 11, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 7, 2017

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

June 20, 2019

Status Verified

June 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

September 5, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 18, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

ExpectationConservative Intervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Fulfillment of expectations with conservative care

    fulfillment of expectations after conservative care implemented as by outcome questionnaire 'Fulfillment of expectations'

    6 weeks post study initiation

  • Fulfillment of expectations with surgery

    fulfillment of expectations after surgical care implemented as measured by 'Fulfillment of expectations' questionnaire

    1 year post-surgery

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Change in Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System (MODEMS)

    baseline, 6 weeks and 1 year post-surgery

  • Expectations of conservative care

    baseline

  • Change in Expectations of surgery as measured by expectation survey

    baseline and 6 weeks

  • Change in Reasons for surgery

    baseline and 6 weeks

  • Change in Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)

    6 weeks and 1 year post-surgery

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Conservative care

EXPERIMENTAL

Exercise and manual therapy

Other: ExerciseOther: Manual Therapy

Interventions

A prescription of progressive rehabilitation exercises designed to strengthen weakened muscle groups and stretch joint movements that demonstrate range of motion limitations will be provided as a home program. Treatment is based on clinical presentation and identification of impairments by the treating clinician. Participants will be seen for 3 visits over 6 weeks and a final visit 1 year post-surgery for those electing to undergo surgery. The interventions will consist of progressive exercise (PE) in two phases with general instruction guidelines. The assigned program will be tailored per each participant's clinical presentation and progressed based on response to exercise load. The researcher will instruct, review and supervise each program initially and, at follow-up visits; as well as monitor progress, re-enforce treatment strategies and modify the respective program accordingly. Each participant will receive a home program manual as well as a program log.

Conservative care

Hip joint and spine manual therapy techniques applied toward the impairments of the subject.

Conservative care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Individuals age 18 to 60 years,
  • diagnosed with FAI by an orthopedic surgeon and exhibiting
  • hip/groin symptoms for at least 3 months (symptomatic); and
  • signs, symptoms and imaging findings conducive to FAI will be recruited from a surgical practice of an orthopedic surgeon in Durham, North Carolina.

You may not qualify if:

  • subjects that have radiographic evidence of hip osteoarthritis that is more than mild in severity defined as Tonnis \>grade 1 or Kellgren-Lawrence \>2;
  • have other concurrent injury/conditions that will affect their ability to participate in the rehabilitation program and/or assessment procedures;
  • exhibit hip dysplasia (center edge angle \<20 degrees on AP radiograph
  • are unable to attend a study physiotherapist or participate in the rehabilitation program if randomized to the PT group;
  • are unable to understand English.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Duke Orthopaedic Clinic Page Road

Durham, North Carolina, 27703, United States

Location

Duke Sports Science Institute

Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States

Location

Duke Orthopaedic Clinic

Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Ayeni O, Chu R, Hetaimish B, Nur L, Simunovic N, Farrokhyar F, Bedi A, Bhandari M. A painful squat test provides limited diagnostic utility in CAM-type femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Apr;22(4):806-11. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2668-8. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

    PMID: 24067989BACKGROUND
  • Beck M, Leunig M, Parvizi J, Boutier V, Wyss D, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Jan;(418):67-73.

    PMID: 15043095BACKGROUND
  • Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, Rodkey WG, Kocher MS, Steadman JR. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med. 2009 May;37(5):890-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546508330143. Epub 2009 Mar 4.

    PMID: 19261899BACKGROUND
  • Cormier S, Lavigne GL, Choiniere M, Rainville P. Expectations predict chronic pain treatment outcomes. Pain. 2016 Feb;157(2):329-338. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000379.

    PMID: 26447703BACKGROUND
  • Diamond LE, Dobson FL, Bennell KL, Wrigley TV, Hodges PW, Hinman RS. Physical impairments and activity limitations in people with femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Feb;49(4):230-42. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093340. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

    PMID: 25246442BACKGROUND
  • Hoffmann TC, Del Mar C. Patients' expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):274-86. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6016.

    PMID: 25531451BACKGROUND
  • Hoffmann TC, Del Mar C. Clinicians' Expectations of the Benefits and Harms of Treatments, Screening, and Tests: A Systematic Review. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):407-419. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8254.

    PMID: 28097303BACKGROUND
  • Kemp JL, Makdissi M, Schache AG, Pritchard MG, Pollard TC, Crossley KM. Hip chondropathy at arthroscopy: prevalence and relationship to labral pathology, femoroacetabular impingement and patient-reported outcomes. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;48(14):1102-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093312. Epub 2014 Mar 21.

    PMID: 24659505BACKGROUND
  • Reiman MP, Thorborg K, Holmich P. Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery Is on the Rise-But What Is the Next Step? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Jun;46(6):406-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.0605.

    PMID: 27245488BACKGROUND
  • Thorborg K, Holmich P, Christensen R, Petersen J, Roos EM. The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist. Br J Sports Med. 2011 May;45(6):478-91. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.080937.

    PMID: 21478502BACKGROUND
  • Wall PD, Fernandez M, Griffin DR, Foster NE. Nonoperative treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of the literature. PM R. 2013 May;5(5):418-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Feb 16.

    PMID: 23419746BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Femoracetabular Impingement

Interventions

ExerciseMusculoskeletal Manipulations

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Motor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological PhenomenaComplementary TherapiesTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitation

Study Officials

  • Michael Reiman, DPT

    Duke University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Prospective cases series
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2017

First Posted

September 11, 2017

Study Start

November 7, 2017

Primary Completion

July 31, 2018

Study Completion

July 31, 2018

Last Updated

June 20, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-06

Locations