Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Anti-age Food Supplement
1 other identifier
interventional
66
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Anti-age Food Supplement: a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study Versus Untreated Group
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 11, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 22, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2017
CompletedSeptember 6, 2017
August 1, 2017
5 months
August 31, 2017
September 4, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Crow's feet visual score variation
Wrinkles grade was determined according to l'Oreal clinical standardized photographic scales
Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)
Nasolabial folds visual score variation
Wrinkles grade was determined according to l'Oreal clinical standardized photographic scales
Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)
Surface microrelief regularity evaluation
Regularity grade was evaluated according to this score: 1. = very regular 2. = regular 3. = irregular 4. = very irregular
Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)
Skin resistance to pinching clinical score variation
The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important 1. = important 2. = moderate 3. = weak 4. = very weak
Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)
Skin resistance to traction clinical score variation
The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important 1. = important 2. = moderate 3. = weak 4. = very weak
Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)
Skin recovery after pinching clinical score variation
The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important 1. = important 2. = moderate 3. = weak 4. = very weak
Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)
Skin dryness clinical score variation
Clinical evaluation of skin dryness was performed according to the following score: 0 = very hydrated skin 1. = hydrated skin 2. = normal skin 3. = kindly dry skin 4. = dry skin 5. = very dry skin
Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)
Vascular homogeneity clinical score variation
Homogeneity grade was determined according to specific reference clinical and photographic scales and to the following clinical score: 0 = very homogeneous 1. = homogeneous 2. = quite not homogeneous 3. = not homogeneous 4. = very not homogeneous 5. = marked not homogeneous
Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)
Pigmentary homogeneity clinical score variation
Homogeneity grade was determined according to specific reference clinical and photographic scales and to the following clinical score: 0 = very homogeneous 1. = homogeneous 2. = quite not homogeneous 3. = not homogeneous 4. = very not homogeneous 5. = marked not homogeneous
Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)
Skin radiance clinical score variation
Skin radiance was evaluated using a 10 points scale from very poor to good
Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)
Skin plumpness clinical score variation
Skin plumpness was evaluated using a 10 points scale from very poor to good
Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Superficial skin hydration
Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)
Deep skin hydration
Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)
Determination of roughness profilometric parameters
Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)
Tolerance evaluation
Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)
Study Arms (2)
Pre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov
EXPERIMENTAL43 caucasian female subjects have taken during a meal, for the first 4 months of trial,1 capsule and 1 tablet/die of the food supplement composed with a precursor of HA (glucosamine) and an enzymatic co-factor of HA synthesis (manganese) .
Untreated group
NO INTERVENTION23 caucasian female subjects untreated
Interventions
Food supplement consisting og a tablet and a capsule, composed with a precursor of HA (glucosamine) and an enzymatic co-factor of HA synthesis (manganese)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- female sex,
- age 35-60 years (with preference for subjects over 45 years),
- body mass index (BMI) 18-27,
- caucasian healthy subjects with moderate-severe cutaneous aging/photoaging (score \> 3 of the reference photographic scale in appendix 8),
- agreeing to present at each study visit without make-up,
- accepting to follow the instructions received by the investigator,
- accepting to not change their habits regarding food, physical activity, make-up use, face cosmetic and cleansing products,
- agreeing not to apply any topical or take any oral product or nutritional supplementation (vitamins and minerals) other than the investigational products, or use face massages or other means known to improve skin wrinkles or skin qualities during the entire duration of the study,
- accepting not to expose their face to strong UV irradiation (UV session, or sun bathes), during the entire duration of the study,
- no participation in a similar study actually or during the previous 3 months
- accepting to sign the Informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy,
- lactation,
- subjects not in menopause who do not use adequate contraceptive precautions in order to avoid pregnancies during the study,
- subjects not in menopause who do not accept to perform the pregnancy test at T0, T1, T2 and T3,
- sensitivity to the test product or its ingredients (to be assessed by the investigator during the baseline visit);
- subjects whose insufficient adhesion to the study protocol is foreseeable.
- Dependent on a clinical condition 4.4.2.1. Dermatological disease,
- Presence of cutaneous disease on the tested area as lesions, scars, malformations,
- recurrent facial/labial herpes,
- clinical and significant skin condition on the test area (e.g. active eczema, dermatitis, psoriasis etc.).
- Endocrine disease,
- hepatic disorder,
- renal disorder,
- cardiac disorder,
- pulmonary disease,
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Derming SRLlead
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2017
First Posted
September 6, 2017
Study Start
October 11, 2016
Primary Completion
March 22, 2017
Study Completion
March 22, 2017
Last Updated
September 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08