Measuring Comfort During Palliative Sedation
COMPAS
Towards a Better Understanding of What Palliative Sedated Patients Experience: Linking Numbers to Experiences
1 other identifier
observational
12
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Background. In case of untreatable suffering at the end of life, palliative sedation may be chosen to assure comfort by reducing the patient's level of consciousness. An important question here is whether such sedated patients are certainly completely free of pain. Because these patients cannot communicate anymore, caregivers have to rely on observation to assess the patient's comfort. Recently however, more sophisticated techniques from the neurosciences (fMRI, EEG) have shown that sometimes consciousness and pain is undetectable with these traditional behavioral methods. Therefore there is an urgent need for a more reliable way of assessment by combining existing observational scales, subjective assessments of caregivers and family and neuroimaging techniques. Aim. The aim of this study is to better understand how unconscious palliative sedated patients experience the last days of their life and to find out if they are really free of pain. Methods In this study the investigators will observe 40 patients starting with initiation of palliative sedation until death. Assessment of comfort based on behavioural observations will be related with the results from a NeuroSense monitor, an EEG-based brain monitor used for evaluation of the adequacy of anesthesia and sedation in the operating room and an ECG-based Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) monitor, which informs about the comfort or discomfort condition of the organism, based on the parasympathetic tone (including calculation of ANI). Additionally, the researchers will investigate whether changes of these measures can be linked to changes in the patients' experience as observed by caregivers and relatives, especially in the last moments of life. An innovative and challenging aspect of this study is its qualitative approach, implying all the different types of data will be used to link "objective" and "subjective" data to achieve a holistic understanding of the study topics. The following data will be collected:
- assessment of pain/comfort by the patients themselves before loss of consciousness due to deep continuous sedation (if possible) by scoring a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
- brain function monitoring (NeuroSense monitor)
- monitoring of parasympathetic tone (ANI monitor)
- assessment by caregivers on 3 VAS scales (different scales or 3 different caregivers?)
- relatives' perception of the quality of the dying process on 3 VAS scales (idem)
- assessment by 2 trained investigators using observational scales
- observation: video and audio registration
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started May 2017
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2019
CompletedOctober 18, 2019
October 1, 2019
2.1 years
August 28, 2017
October 17, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Level of awareness
Level of awareness as measured by a NeuroSense monitor and expressed as the WAVcns index (Wavelet-based Anesthetic Value for Central Nervous System). The WAVcns is based on cortical EEG.
From date of enrollment until the date of death, on average less than 1 week.
Level of pain and discomfort
Level of pain and discomfort as measured by an ANI-monitor and expressed by the analgesia nociception index (ANI). The ANI is based on HRV (heart rate variability).
From date of enrollment until the date of death, on average less than 1 week.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Pain
From date of enrollment until the date of death (on average less than 1 week), during routine care, at least twice a day.
Awareness
From date of enrollment until the date of death (on average less than 1 week), during routine care, at least twice a day.
Communication
From date of enrollment until the date of death (on average less than 1 week), during routine care, at least twice a day.
Pain
From date of enrollment until the date of death (on average less than 1 week), during visit, once a day.
Awareness
From date of enrollment until the date of death (on average less than 1 week), during visit, once a day.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Device monitoring
NeuroSense monitoring and ANI monitoring
Interventions
From the start of palliative sedation, monitoring of EEG with NeuroSense device (WAVcns: Wavelet Anesthetic Value of the Central Nervous System) and ANI-monitoring (Analgesia Nociception Index) will be initiated.
Eligibility Criteria
All patients older than 18 years where palliative sedation is expected to be initiated, regardless of underlying diseases.
You may qualify if:
- Patients may be included if they are considered by their treating physician as:
- in their last week of life
- in conditions that might, when not treated, cause high levels of distress
- sedated
- unable to communicate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Blasius
Dendermonde, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9200, Belgium
University Hospital
Brussels, 1090, Belgium
Related Publications (2)
Six S, Laureys S, Poelaert J, Mairesse O, Theuns P, Bilsen J, Deschepper R. Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study. Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):377-390. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00214-z. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
PMID: 33151515DERIVEDSix S, Laureys S, Poelaert J, Bilsen J, Theuns P, Deschepper R. Comfort in palliative sedation (Compas): a transdisciplinary mixed method study protocol for linking objective assessments to subjective experiences. BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Apr 18;17(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0316-2.
PMID: 29669562DERIVED
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Reginald Deschepper, PhD
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2017
First Posted
September 6, 2017
Study Start
May 12, 2017
Primary Completion
June 30, 2019
Study Completion
September 30, 2019
Last Updated
October 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10