Motion Sickness Medications and Vestibular Time Constant
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sea sickness represents a major limitation on the performance of ships' crew. One of the challenges faced by the physician in the motion sickness clinic when prescribing anti-sea sickness medication is to select the appropriate drug for the patient. Difficulties arise due to high variability in the response to different drugs. In the case of sea sickness, the current procedure is to examine the drug's efficacy in each individual during real time exposure to sea conditions. A number of studies have documented the presence of sea sickness drug receptors in the vestibular nuclei, which determine the vestibular time constant. Two clinical vestibular tests which evaluate the time constant are the Velocity Step and OKAN tests. The purpose of the proposed study is to evaluate the influence of motion sickness drugs on the vestibular time constant, as a possible bioequivalent of drug potency in the individual subject. Eighty crew members will be recruited and divided into groups responsive and non-responsive to the sea sickness drugs scopolamine and meclizine. Subjects having a Wiker score of 7 in waves 1 meter high without drug treatment, and no improvement in symptoms after treatment will be defined as non-responsive to sea sickness drugs. Subjects having a Wiker score of 7 in waves 1 meter high without drug treatment, and a Wiker score of 4 or less after treatment, will be defined as responsive to drug therapy. Kwells, Bonine and placebo, will be assigned to each subject in a random, double-blind fashion. Each group will perform the Velocity Step and OKAN tests before, one and two hours after drug or placebo administration.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jun 2017
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2020
CompletedOctober 3, 2025
September 1, 2025
2.3 years
April 2, 2017
September 30, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Vestibular Time Constant Change/differential
One of the parameters measured in step velocity test \[Sec\]
Baseline at the beginning of session prior to comparator (drug/placebo) receiving, 1 hour after receiving comparator and 2 hours after receiving comparator.
Step Velocity Test Gain Change/differential
One of the parameters measured in step velocity test \[0-1\]
Baseline at the beginning of session prior to comparator (drug/placebo) receiving, 1 hour after receiving comparator and 2 hours after receiving comparator.
Optokinetic After Nystagmus (OKAN) Gain Change/differential
One of the parameters measured in optokinetic test \[0-1\]
Baseline at the beginning of session prior to comparator (drug/placebo) receiving, 1 hour after receiving comparator and 2 hours after receiving comparator.
Optokinetic After Nystagmus (OKAN) Time Constant Change/differential
One of the parameters measured in optokinetic test \[Sec\]
Baseline at the beginning of session prior to comparator (drug/placebo) receiving, 1 hour after receiving comparator and 2 hours after receiving comparator.
Optokinetic After Nystagmus (OKAN) Slow Phase velocity Sum Change/differential
One of the parameters measured in optokinetic test \[Deg/Sec\]
Baseline at the beginning of session prior to comparator (drug/placebo) receiving, 1 hour after receiving comparator and 2 hours after receiving comparator.
Pupil Size Change/differential
Using pupil size chart \[Mm\]
Baseline at the beginning of session prior to comparator (drug/placebo) receiving, 1 hour after receiving comparator and 2 hours after receiving comparator.
Pupil Accommodation and Convergation Change/differential
Eye test for drugs side effects.
Baseline at the beginning of session prior to comparator (drug/placebo) receiving, 1 hour after receiving comparator and 2 hours after receiving comparator.
Side Effects Questionnaire Change/differential
Questionnaire of drugs' side effects.
Baseline at the beginning of session prior to comparator (drug/placebo) receiving, 1 hour after receiving comparator and 2 hours after receiving comparator.
Study Arms (8)
Responsive to Scopolamine (Active)
ACTIVE COMPARATORScopolamine administration - subject will take 1 tablet per os (Kwells, Hyoscine Hydrobromide 0.3mg, 1\*day )
Responsive to Scopolamine (Placebo)
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo administration - subject will take 1 tablet per os (Placebo Oral Tablet, no active substance in the tablet)
Non-responsive to Scopolamine (Active)
ACTIVE COMPARATORScopolamine administration - subject will take 1 tablet per os (Kwells, Hyoscine Hydrobromide 0.3mg, 1\*day )
Non-responsive to Scopolamine (Placebo)
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo administration - subject will take 1 tablet per os (Placebo Oral Tablet, no active substance in the tablet)
Responsive to Meclizine (Active)
ACTIVE COMPARATORMeclizine administration - subject will take 1 tablet per os (Bonine 25Mg Chewable Tablet, Meclizine Hydrochloride 25mg, 1\*day )
Responsive to Meclizine (Placebo)
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo administration - subject will take 1 tablet per os (Placebo Oral Tablet, no active substance in the tablet)
Non-responsive to Meclizine (Active)
ACTIVE COMPARATORMeclizine administration - subject will take 1 tablet per os (Bonine 25Mg Chewable Tablet, Meclizine Hydrochloride 25mg, 1\*day )
Non-responsive to Meclizine (Placebo)
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo administration - subject will take 1 tablet per os (Placebo Oral Tablet, no active substance in the tablet)
Interventions
Motion sickness drug
Motion sickness drug
No active substance in the tablet
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy soldiers between the ages of 18 to 40, who suffering from sea sickness
- hours prior to session without any use of medications
- Soldiers who vomit in waves 1.5 meter high without drugs treatment
You may not qualify if:
- Anamnestic hearing Impairment
- Ear infection of any kind
- Pathological finding in an otoneurological examination, witch will be done by a trained neurophysiologist / a physician. In any case of pathological finding, patient will be advised to continue medical assesment.
- Vision pathologies the interfere with VNG test.
- Withdrawal of informed consent by the patient of any cause.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Israeli Navy Medical Institute
Haifa, Israel
Related Publications (8)
Cheung BS, Howard IP, Money KE. Visually-induced sickness in normal and bilaterally labyrinthine-defective subjects. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1991 Jun;62(6):527-31.
PMID: 1859339BACKGROUNDAdamenko VM, Evangelopoulou T, Yfantopoulos J. Kirlian photography--a tool in the diagnosing of psychopathology. J Biol Photogr. 1988 Jul;56(3):85-8. No abstract available.
PMID: 3182575BACKGROUNDGolding JF, Gresty MA. Pathophysiology and treatment of motion sickness. Curr Opin Neurol. 2015 Feb;28(1):83-8. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000163.
PMID: 25502048BACKGROUNDIshiyama A, Lopez I, Wackym PA. Molecular characterization of muscarinic receptors in the human vestibular periphery. Implications for pharmacotherapy. Am J Otol. 1997 Sep;18(5):648-54.
PMID: 9303164BACKGROUNDPhelan KD, Nakamura J, Gallagher JP. Histamine depolarizes rat medial vestibular nucleus neurons recorded intracellularly in vitro. Neurosci Lett. 1990 Feb 16;109(3):287-92. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(90)90009-x.
PMID: 2139500BACKGROUNDPyykko I, Schalen L, Matsuoka I. Transdermally administered scopolamine vs. dimenhydrinate. II. Effect on different types of nystagmus. Acta Otolaryngol. 1985 May-Jun;99(5-6):597-604. doi: 10.3109/00016488509182266.
PMID: 4024910BACKGROUNDTal D, Hershkovitz D, Kaminski G, Bar R. Vestibular evoked myogenic potential threshold and seasickness susceptibility. J Vestib Res. 2006;16(6):273-8.
PMID: 17726280BACKGROUNDBar R, Gil A, Tal D. Safety of double-dose transdermal scopolamine. Pharmacotherapy. 2009 Sep;29(9):1082-8. doi: 10.1592/phco.29.9.1082.
PMID: 19698013BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dror Tal, PhD
Head of Motion Sickness and Human Performance Laboratory, Principal Investigator
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Motion Sickness and Human Performance Laboratory, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2017
First Posted
September 1, 2017
Study Start
June 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 30, 2019
Study Completion
January 1, 2020
Last Updated
October 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share