Sponsor study identifier
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Study Start
August 2013
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
March 2015
Actual (reported)Study Completion
March 2015
Actual (reported)The purpose of this study is to compare the preparation quality by using Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale between the standard PEG preparation and the addition of water enema in participants scheduled for CRC screening
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
March 2015
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
August 2013
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
March 2015
Actual (reported)March 2015
Actual (reported)May 3, 2017
Actual (reported)September 1, 2017
Actual (reported)Bowel preparation quality using Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale
Evaluate Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale by 2 endoscopists using video record
1 days
The effect of addition of water enema in standard PEG bowel preparation in terms of adenoma detection rate
1 days
The effect of addition of water enema in the standard PEG bowel preparation in terms of the completeness of the examination
1 day
The effect of addition of water enema in the standard PEG bowel preparation in terms of total and withdrawal times
1 day
The effect of addition of water enema in the standard PEG bowel preparation in terms of safety and adverse events
3 days
Consecutive participants will be randomly assigned to take a preparation regimen of 3 liter of PEG 8-16 hr. before colonoscopy without water enema. Before the procedure, investigators record baseline parameters. Colonoscopies underwent by experienced endoscopists and by GI fellows. During the colonoscopy, the investigators recorded video, cecal intubation and withdraw time, amount and position of polyps, rate of complete examination and complication. The video was sent to other 2 endoscopists who did not known which participant was enema to evaluate the quality of bowel cleansing by using Ottawa bowel preparation scale and Likert scale for evaluation of side effect, complication during PEG ingestion, enema and colonoscopy, and participant satisfactory.
Consecutive participants will be randomly assigned to take a preparation regimen of 3 liter of PEG 8-16 hr. before colonoscopy and enema with sterile water until stool was clear or patient felt discomfort but not exceed 3 liter, before colonoscopy. Before the procedure, investigators record baseline parameters. Colonoscopies underwent by experienced endoscopists and by GI fellows. During the colonoscopy, the investigators recorded video, cecal intubation and withdraw time, amount and position of polyps, rate of complete examination and complication.The video was sent to other 2 endoscopists who did not known which participant was enema to evaluate the quality of bowel cleansing by using Ottawa bowel preparation scale and Likert scale.
Addition of water enema in standard PEG preparation in participants scheduled for CRC screening.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Somchai Leelakusolvong, M.D.
Mahidol University
100 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
May 3, 2017
First Posted
September 1, 2017
Study Start
August 2013
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
This date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
March 2015
Actual (reported)Study Completion
March 2015
Actual (reported)Last Updated
September 7, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: