Biofeedback-based Relaxation Training or Self-alert Training to Alleviate Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.

NCT03268187 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 009/2017
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 61
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The presented study compares the effectiveness of a biofeedback-based relaxation training with the effectiveness of a biofeedback-based self-alert training on the reduction of fatigue in multiple sclerosis patients using a between groups design. Furthermore, the relation of fatigue in multiple sclerosis patients and autonomic potentials as well as the performance in a vigilance task will be examined. The relaxation training is based on the principle of progressive muscle relaxation according to Jacobsen. The patient is asked to tense all muscles in their face and perceive consciously the relaxation afterwards according to verbal cues. In the self-alert training condition, the patient will hear verbal cues to increase their attention. In both conditions the external cues given will be reduced in four phases until the patient has to cue himself. The patient is advised to track the changes in the skin resistance mirrored by biofeedback on a screen. In both conditions the training will be split on two days. During the whole examination heart rate and skin resistance will be recorded. The allocation to the training happens randomly. On the first day the patient will complete questionnaires to survey depression and apathy and do a baseline vigilance task. Before and after the vigilance task the current fatigue status will be assessed using a visual analogue scale. Afterwards an introduction in the treatment method will be given. On the second day the introduction into the training will be repeated. Afterwards a short time vigilance task will be done and questionnaires to survey fatigue and sleep behaviour and quality will be completed. Subsequently the last part of the training (no external cues) will be done. The examination will be completed by a long-time vigilance task. Before and after the vigilance task the current fatigue status will be assessed using a visual analogue scale. It is hypothesised that especially the biofeedback-based self-alert training has a positive effect on fatigue and the vigilance performance in multiple sclerosis patients, as it increases the ectodermal activity and increases the sympathetic activation. It was shown that phasic changes of the skin resistance are correlated with an increase of neuronal activity in the brain areas relevant for vigilance (Critchley et al., 2002; Nagai et al., 2004). The relaxation training will reduce the sympatho-adrenergic excitation disposition and reduce the level of activity. Consequently, we do not expect an alleviation of the perceived fatigue according to our underlying model (Hanken et al., 2016). In addition, it is hypothesized that, independent from the treatment, autonomic potentials correlate with fatigue.

Conditions

Fatigue; Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Cognitive Fatigue; Multiple Sclerosis; Biofeedback; Self-Alert Training; Vigilance; Autonomic potentials

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

• Reaction Time of Vigilance Task (TAP)

  Changes of the reaction time in the vigilance task

  Vigilance is measured at the beginning of the first day before the training introduction as well as after the training at the second day.

• Subjective Fatigue (VAS)

  The current perceived fatigue

  Before and after the long-term vigilance tasks at day 1 and 2

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Omissions and errors of Vigilance Task (TAP)

  At day one before the introduction in the training and at day two after the training.

Study Arms (2)

Self-Alert Training

EXPERIMENTAL

Biofeedback-based Self-Alert Training Vigilance Task Questionnaires accessing apathy, fatigue, depression, sleep quality, sleep behavior

Device: Biofeedback; Behavioral: Self-Alert Training

Relaxation Training

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Biofeedback-based Relaxation Training Vigilance Task Questionnaires accessing apathy, fatigue, depression, sleep quality, sleep behavior

Device: Biofeedback; Behavioral: Relaxation Training

Interventions

Biofeedback DEVICE

The skin conductance of the patient is measured and fed back to the patient via screen.

Relaxation Training; Self-Alert Training

Self-Alert Training BEHAVIORAL

Self-Alert Training

Self-Alert Training

Relaxation Training BEHAVIORAL

Relaxation Training

Relaxation Training

Eligibility Criteria

• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• at least a moderate cognitive fatigue (Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognition minimum 22)
• clinical diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis

You may not qualify if:

• psychiatric conditions independent from Multiple Sclerosis
• Pregnancy
• regular intake of psychostimulants
• no relapse in the last four weeks before
• no cortisone therapy in the last four weeks before
• patients with schizophrenia or serious personality disorders

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Rehazentrum Wilhelmshaven: lead

Study Sites (1)

Rehazentrum Wilhelmshaven

Wilhelmshaven, Lower Saxony, 26382, Germany

Location

Related Publications (1)

• Sander C, Braun N, Modes F, Schlake HP, Eling P, Hildebrandt H. Can biofeedback-based training alleviate fatigue and vigilance performance in fatigued MS patients? Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2022 Jan;32(1):131-147. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1808023. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

  PMID: 32851896 DERIVED

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fatigue; Multiple Sclerosis

Interventions

Biofeedback, Psychology; Relaxation Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms; Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS; Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System; Nervous System Diseases; Demyelinating Diseases; Autoimmune Diseases; Immune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mind-Body Therapies; Complementary Therapies; Therapeutics; Behavior Therapy; Psychotherapy; Behavioral Disciplines and Activities; Feedback, Psychological

Study Officials

• Helmut Hildebrandt, Prof

  Carl- von Ossietzky University Oldenburg

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Psychologist

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 29, 2017
• First Posted: August 31, 2017
• Study Start: July 17, 2017
• Primary Completion: June 9, 2018
• Study Completion: October 18, 2018
• Last Updated: April 11, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-04

Locations

DE (1)