Comparing Diagnostic Accuracy for Liver Tumours Between the Combination of CEUS and CEMRI Versus CECT and CEMRI
A Prospective Clinical Study for Comparing Diagnostic Accuracy for Liver Tumours Between the Combination of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound and Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography and CEMRI
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unique regarding diagnosis because the clinical diagnosis without pathology proof is accepted. The dynamic image, including contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image (CEMRI) were recognized in many guidelines for diagnosing the HCC. In contrast to the CT and MRI, ultrasound (US) with/without contrast is suggested by several societies as the sufficient surveillance modality. The contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has aroused more attentions regarding the rapid improvement of contrast medium. In this study, the investigators conducted a prospective, single-center, open-label trial to compare the efficacy and safety of CEUS + CEMRI in characterizing HCC, in comparison with CECT + CEMRI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 29, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 11, 2019
CompletedJuly 1, 2020
June 1, 2019
1.4 years
August 27, 2017
June 29, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The sensitivity and specificity of the blinded read of CEUS+CEMRI and CECT+CEMRI in characterization of HCC
the 95% two-sided confidence interval will be presented for both sensitivity and specificity in characterization of HCC
up to 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The sensitivity and specificity of the blinded read of CEUS+CEMRI and CECT+CEMRI in differential diagnosis of liver tumours
up to 1 year
Study Arms (1)
Sonazoid- CEUS+CEMRI or CECT+CEMRI
EXPERIMENTALComparing Diagnostic Accuracy for Liver Tumours Between the Combination of CEUS and CEMRI Versus CECT and CEMRI
Interventions
Sonazoid- CEUS+CEMRI in a characterization of HCC, in comparison with CECT+CEMRI.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 20-70
- All patients presented with newly diagnosed liver lesion(s) with initial impression of malignancy.
- Lesions no larger than 3cm in diameter.
- Signed and dated informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- The lesion with previously documented histology
- The lesion previously treated with Percutaneous Ethanol Injection, Radiofrequency Ablation, or Transarterial Chemoembolization
- The lesion will not have histological confirmation after differential diagnosis
- The subject had known hypersensitivity to any component of Sonazoid, including a history of allergies to eggs or egg products (i.e., manifested by full body rash, respiratory difficulty, oral or laryngeal swelling, hypotension or shock).
- The subject was considered to be unsuitable to participate in the study by the investigator.
- The subject was known to have a right-to-left shunt, severe pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery pressure \>90 mmHg) or uncontrolled systemic hypertension.
- The subject had a recent acute coronary syndrome or clinically unstable ischaemic cardiac disease, including: evolving or ongoing myocardial infarction, typical angina at rest within the last 7 days, significant worsening of cardiac symptoms within the last 7 days, recent coronary artery intervention or other factors suggesting clinical instability (e.g., recent deterioration of electrocardiogram, laboratory or clinical findings), acute cardiac failure, Class III/IV cardiac failure, or severe rhythm disorders.
- The subject had adult respiratory distress syndrome, severe emphysema, pulmonary vasculitis, or a history of pulmonary emboli.
- The subject had known thrombosis within the liver, or portal, or mesenteric veins.
- The patient with iodine/Gd allergy, lower epidermal growth factor receptor level(\<50), liver/renal dysfunction, and other condition that unsuitable to receive contrast
- Pregnant and breastfeeding women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kai-Wen Huang, MD, PhD
National Taiwan University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2017
First Posted
August 30, 2017
Study Start
July 1, 2017
Primary Completion
November 29, 2018
Study Completion
January 11, 2019
Last Updated
July 1, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share