NCT03267290

Brief Summary

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unique regarding diagnosis because the clinical diagnosis without pathology proof is accepted. The dynamic image, including contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image (CEMRI) were recognized in many guidelines for diagnosing the HCC. In contrast to the CT and MRI, ultrasound (US) with/without contrast is suggested by several societies as the sufficient surveillance modality. The contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has aroused more attentions regarding the rapid improvement of contrast medium. In this study, the investigators conducted a prospective, single-center, open-label trial to compare the efficacy and safety of CEUS + CEMRI in characterizing HCC, in comparison with CECT + CEMRI.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
12

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 27, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 30, 2017

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 29, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 11, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 1, 2020

Status Verified

June 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

August 27, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 29, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The sensitivity and specificity of the blinded read of CEUS+CEMRI and CECT+CEMRI in characterization of HCC

    the 95% two-sided confidence interval will be presented for both sensitivity and specificity in characterization of HCC

    up to 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The sensitivity and specificity of the blinded read of CEUS+CEMRI and CECT+CEMRI in differential diagnosis of liver tumours

    up to 1 year

Study Arms (1)

Sonazoid- CEUS+CEMRI or CECT+CEMRI

EXPERIMENTAL

Comparing Diagnostic Accuracy for Liver Tumours Between the Combination of CEUS and CEMRI Versus CECT and CEMRI

Diagnostic Test: Sonazoid- CEUS, CEMRI, CECT

Interventions

Sonazoid- CEUS+CEMRI in a characterization of HCC, in comparison with CECT+CEMRI.

Sonazoid- CEUS+CEMRI or CECT+CEMRI

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 20-70
  • All patients presented with newly diagnosed liver lesion(s) with initial impression of malignancy.
  • Lesions no larger than 3cm in diameter.
  • Signed and dated informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • The lesion with previously documented histology
  • The lesion previously treated with Percutaneous Ethanol Injection, Radiofrequency Ablation, or Transarterial Chemoembolization
  • The lesion will not have histological confirmation after differential diagnosis
  • The subject had known hypersensitivity to any component of Sonazoid, including a history of allergies to eggs or egg products (i.e., manifested by full body rash, respiratory difficulty, oral or laryngeal swelling, hypotension or shock).
  • The subject was considered to be unsuitable to participate in the study by the investigator.
  • The subject was known to have a right-to-left shunt, severe pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery pressure \>90 mmHg) or uncontrolled systemic hypertension.
  • The subject had a recent acute coronary syndrome or clinically unstable ischaemic cardiac disease, including: evolving or ongoing myocardial infarction, typical angina at rest within the last 7 days, significant worsening of cardiac symptoms within the last 7 days, recent coronary artery intervention or other factors suggesting clinical instability (e.g., recent deterioration of electrocardiogram, laboratory or clinical findings), acute cardiac failure, Class III/IV cardiac failure, or severe rhythm disorders.
  • The subject had adult respiratory distress syndrome, severe emphysema, pulmonary vasculitis, or a history of pulmonary emboli.
  • The subject had known thrombosis within the liver, or portal, or mesenteric veins.
  • The patient with iodine/Gd allergy, lower epidermal growth factor receptor level(\<50), liver/renal dysfunction, and other condition that unsuitable to receive contrast
  • Pregnant and breastfeeding women

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, Taiwan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteDigestive System DiseasesLiver Diseases

Study Officials

  • Kai-Wen Huang, MD, PhD

    National Taiwan University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2017

First Posted

August 30, 2017

Study Start

July 1, 2017

Primary Completion

November 29, 2018

Study Completion

January 11, 2019

Last Updated

July 1, 2020

Record last verified: 2019-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations