SEdation Versus General Anesthesia for Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke
SEGA
SEGA - SEdation Versus General Anesthesia for Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke - a Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
260
1 country
11
Brief Summary
Objectives: This study aims to estimate overall treatment benefit (improvement in disability) among acute ischemic stroke patients that are randomized to General Anesthesia (GA) compared with Sedation (CS) during endovascular therapy. Assess safety (as measured by incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage); rates of Endovascular therapy (EVT) procedural complications, reperfusion; and quality of life. Hypothesis: GA during EVT for acute ischemic stroke improves functional outcomes at 90 days compared to sedation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 stroke
Started Jul 2018
Typical duration for phase_4 stroke
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 16, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 22, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 22, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 5, 2024
CompletedNovember 26, 2025
September 1, 2025
4.8 years
August 16, 2017
April 22, 2024
November 13, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Modified Ordinal Rankin Scale (mRS)
mRS ranges from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability. 6 categories are reported: number of participants who had a score of 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 will be reported separately as 5 categories, and those who had a score of 5 or 6 will be combined and reported as a single category. 0: no symptoms/normal (physical, cognitive etc.) 1. no significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities 2. slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance 3. moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance from another individual (use of walking aids alone is not counted as assistance) 4. moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance 5. severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention 6. dead
90 days
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Dichotomized Modified Ordinal Rankin Scale (mRS)
90 days
Number of Participants With Angiographic Reperfusion Defined as Modified a TICI Score of ≥ 2b
post procedure within 6 hours
Score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, or NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
24-36 hours post procedure
Number of Participants With Functional Independence as Indicated by an mRS Score of 0, 1, or 2
90 days
Quality of Life as Assessed by the European Quality of Life (EuroQol) 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) Assessment
90 days
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Time From Groin Puncture to Reperfusion
post procedure within 6 hours
Time From Door to TICI ≥ 2b Reperfusion
post procedure within 6 hours
Study Arms (2)
Sedation
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe protocol does not specify a particular combination of drugs that must be used for sedation. The choice of specific drugs and dosages for achieving sedation will be up to the anesthesiologist.
General Anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe protocol does not specify a particular combination of drugs that must be used for general anesthesia. The choice of specific drugs and dosages for achieving general anesthesia will be up to the anesthesiologist.
Interventions
The protocol does not specify a particular combination of drugs that must be used for sedation. The most common drugs utilized for sedation and wide dosing ranges are included in the protocol (i.e., sedation will be provided under the supervision of an anesthesiologist and may use a combination of fentanyl, midazolam, dexmedetomidine infusion (with or without loading dose), and/or low-dose propofol by intermittent bolus or infusion); however, the choice of specific drugs and dosages for achieving conscious sedation or general anesthesia will not be specified by the protocol but will be up to the anesthesiologist.
The protocol doesn't specify drugs that must be used for GA, the choice of drugs and dosages for achieving general anesthesia will not be specified by the protocol but will be up to the anesthesiologist. The most common drugs utilized for GA and wide dosing ranges included in the protocol are (GA will be provided under the supervision of an anesthesiologist and induction of anesthesia may be achieved with propofol and/or etomidate; muscle paralysis may be achieved with succinylcholine or non-depolarizing paralytic (rocuronium or vecuronium); and adjuvant lidocaine and fentanyl; if intravenous maintenance of anesthesia is used, it may be achieved by propofol infusion at 50 to 150 mcg/kg/min with redosing of non-depolarizing paralytic and fentanyl as needed; if inhalational maintenance of anesthesia is used it will be achieved with sevoflurane 1% to 2% or desflurane 3% to 6% end-tidal concentration with redosing of non-depolarizing paralytic and fentanyl as needed)
The first line therapeutic embolectomy device should be a stent retriever. Additional Endovascular therapies including, but not limited to, intra- or extracranial angioplasty ± stenting; antithrombotics (oral, IV or IA antiplatelets or anticoagulants) intra-arterial thrombolytics; are left to the decision of the local treatment team.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Acute ischemic stroke due to large intracranial vessel occlusion demonstrated on CT-angiography in the following anterior circulation locations that will be treated by endovascular therapy (EVT):
- Internal Carotid Artery (terminal "T" or "L-type"- occlusion)
- Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) M1 or proximal M2
- Anterior Cerebral Artery (ACA) A1 or proximal A2
- Patients who receive IV-tPA thrombolysis are eligible provided the drug was delivered within 4.5 hours of stroke onset or last seen normal and in accordance with local hospital standard of care.
- Ages 18-90.
- National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 6-30
- Time of from stroke symptom onset of last seen normal to start of EVT (defined as groin puncture) ≤ 16 hours.
- Limited infarct core, as defined below and adapted from the 2018 American Heart Association guidelines
- For patients presenting ≤ 6 hours from time of symptom onset or last seen normal, Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) ≥ 6
- For patients presenting \> 6 hours and ≤ 16 hours from time of symptom onset or last seen normal, they must satisfy EITHER ONE of the two following criteria:
- i. Ischemic core by CT Perfusion or MRI/MR Perfusion \< 70 mL, a ratio of volume of penumbral tissue to infarct core of ≥ 1.8, and and absolute volume of penumbral tissue of ≥ 15 mL OR ii. For patients with NIHSS ≥ 10, infarct core of \< 31 mL by CT Perfusion or MRI; For patients with NIHSS ≥ 20, infarct core \< 51 mL.
- Subject willing/able to return for protocol required follow up visits.
- No significant pre-stroke disability (modified Rankin Score must be ≤ 2).
- Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test.
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Coma on admission (Glasgow Coma Scale \<8), need for intubation upon ED arrival, or transferred patients who present previously intubated.
- Severe agitation or seizures on admission that preclude safe vascular access.
- Loss of airway protective reflexes and/or vomiting on admission.
- Predicted or known difficult airway.
- Pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disease that would confound the neurological or functional evaluations, e.g. dementia.
- Presumed septic embolus, or suspicion of bacterial endocarditis
- Currently participating or has participated in any investigational drug or device study within 30 days.
- Inability to follow-up for 90-day assessment.
- Known history of allergy to anesthesia drugs.
- Known history or family history of malignant hyperthermia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
Indiana University College of Medicine
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Henry Ford Health System
Louisville, Kentucky, 48150, United States
Rochester Regional Health
Rochester, New York, 14617, United States
Wake Forest Baptist Health
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Geisinger Health
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822, United States
Temple University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19122, United States
Memorial Hermann Hospital System - Memorial City Medical Center
Houston, Texas, 77024, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center Houston with Memorial Hermann Hospital System - The Medical Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Memorial Hermann Hospital System - The Woodlands Medical Center
The Woodlands, Texas, 77380, United States
Related Publications (2)
Chen PR, Artime CA, Sheth SA, Pedroza C, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Wolfe S, Sitton C, Kan P, Tanweer O, Chebl A, Schirmer CM, Morrow JT, Alderazi YJ, Bohnstedt B, Erkmen K, Samaniego EA, Garrido E, Savitz SI, Engstrom A, Aguilar E, Nguyen T, Barreto AD; SEGA Investigators. Sedation vs General Anesthesia for Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: The SEGA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2025 Dec 1;82(12):1265-1273. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3775.
PMID: 41082222DERIVEDTosello R, Riera R, Tosello G, Clezar CN, Amorim JE, Vasconcelos V, Joao BB, Flumignan RL. Type of anaesthesia for acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 20;7(7):CD013690. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013690.pub2.
PMID: 35857365DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Peng Roc Chen, MD
- Organization
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Peng Roc Chen, MD
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew Barreto, MD
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carlos Artime, MD
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sunil Sheth, MD
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sean Savitz, MD
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Claudia Pedroza, PhD
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor in Neurosurgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 16, 2017
First Posted
August 28, 2017
Study Start
July 1, 2018
Primary Completion
April 22, 2023
Study Completion
April 22, 2023
Last Updated
November 26, 2025
Results First Posted
September 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2025-09