Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Performances of 4 Dialyzers in Different Mode Treatments
BIOMODAL
Evaluation of Dialyzers' Biocompatibility and Performances Compared in Different Dialysis Treatments : Conventional Hemodialysis and Post-dilution Hemodialfiltration
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Prospective multicenter randomized cross-over study Number of patients : 32 (8 patients per group) Obtain objectives data to advise each hemodialyzer according to dialysis treatment and patient profile. To evaluate the different hemodialyzers and judge their extraction performances in HD and post HDF. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of the hemodialyzers and the patients' inflammatory status.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2018
CompletedFebruary 21, 2019
February 1, 2019
1.7 years
July 12, 2017
February 20, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of middle molecules extraction
Measurements of β 2 microglobulin (11,8kDa), myoglobin (17kDa), Beta Trace (21kDa), Free immunoglobulin light chains Kappa (23kDa), myostatin (40kDa), glycoprotein orosomucoïd (44kDa)
one week per dialyzer per patient
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Extraction of uremic toxins
one week per dialyzer per patient
Biocompatibility assessment
one week per dialyzer per patient
Monitoring of Nutrition status
one week per dialyzer per patient
Handling of the devices
one week per dialyzer per patient
Dialysis adequacy evaluation
one week per dialyzer per patient
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Hemodialysis
EXPERIMENTALpatients treated by conventionnal hemodialysis
Hemodiafiltration post dilution
EXPERIMENTALpatients treated by HDF post-dilution
Interventions
polysulfon membrane coated with vitamin E
polyethersulfon membrane with large surface area : 2,7m²
polyslfon membrane with gamma sterilization
polysulfon membrane with steam sterilization
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patient with chronic kidney disease dialyzed for at least one month and treated with the treatment mode that we will test
- Patient using post-dilution HDF mode have to use EuDIAL volume guidelines (20-22L minimum)
- Patient treated before with high permeability membrane
- Patient with vascular access allowing a blood flow rate with a minimum of 300 mL/min
- Patient treated with a high surface area dialyzer ≥ 1,8 m²
- Patient covered by the social French health organism
- Patient informed of the study goals and having signed the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with a vascular access not allowing a blood flow rate minimum of 300 mL/min
- Patient with a fast progressive chronic disease
- Patient with an uncontrolled anemia
- Patient refusing to sign the informed consent
- Pregnant or nursing patient
- Pediatric patient
- Patient under tutorship
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hemotechlead
Study Sites (1)
AIDER-Lapeyronie
Montpellier, 34295, France
Related Publications (2)
Kokubo K, Kurihara Y, Kobayashi K, Tsukao H, Kobayashi H. Evaluation of the Biocompatibility of Dialysis Membranes. Blood Purif. 2015;40(4):293-7. doi: 10.1159/000441576. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
PMID: 26656534BACKGROUNDMaduell F, Moreso F, Mora-Macia J, Pons M, Ramos R, Carreras J, Soler J, Torres F; study group ESHOL. ESHOL study reanalysis: All-cause mortality considered by competing risks and time-dependent covariates for renal transplantation. Nefrologia. 2016;36(2):156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Dec 8. English, Spanish.
PMID: 26672890BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jean Paul CRISTOL, Professor
University Hospital, Montpellier
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2017
First Posted
August 25, 2017
Study Start
November 21, 2016
Primary Completion
July 31, 2018
Study Completion
October 31, 2018
Last Updated
February 21, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share