Study Stopped
Lack of performance
Comparison of Functional Recovery After Distal Intra-articular Radius Fracture With a Dorsal Tilt Treated With an Anterior Plate Versus a Posterior Plate
PAPPO
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
For les intra-articular fractures, plate osteosynthesis is the indicated technique. Despite the absence of consensus, in recent years, the use of open reduction associated with internal plate fixation has considerably developed. Indeed, this therapeutic option allows a more anatomical reduction and stable fixation. First-generation posterior plates presented complications related to the size of the plate, notably tendon lesions. Over the last ten years, a new generation of thinner anterior plates has reduced these complications. In the literature, few studies have compared these two techniques in terms of functional and radiological outcomes. The hypothesis of this research is that osteosynthesis using a posterior plate is more effective than that with an anterior plate in terms of functional recovery in patients older than 45 years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 21, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 24, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 4, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 4, 2018
CompletedFebruary 22, 2024
February 1, 2024
1.5 years
August 21, 2017
February 21, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of functional recovery using the DASH questionnaire
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Osteosynthesis using a posterior plate
ACTIVE COMPARATOROsteosynthesis using an anterior plate
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Questionnaire asking about Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
postoperative x-rays at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months
Osteosynthesis using a posterior plate
Osteosynthesis using an anterior plate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who have provided written informed consent
- Patients older than 45 years
- Patients presenting a closed intra-articular fracture of the distal radius with a dorsal tilt (stages B2, C1, C2 and C3)
You may not qualify if:
- Adults under guardianship
- Patients without national health insurance cover
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Patients presenting other injuries in the same upper limb
- Patients presenting injuries of the wrist or hand (scapholunate injury, fracture of the carpal bone or fingers)
- Pre-trauma paralysis of the limb
- Open fracture
- Fracture with palmer tilt or extra-articular
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chu Dijon Bourgogne
Dijon, 21000, France
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2017
First Posted
August 24, 2017
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
July 4, 2018
Study Completion
July 4, 2018
Last Updated
February 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02