The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is Translated From English to Turkish and Assess the Validity and Reliability in Athletic Population Who Have Foot and Ankle Disorders.

NCT03259750 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: HEK09/103
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 51
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Sport activity induces a relevant risk for lower extremities especially ankle and foot structures. Athletes who participate in basketball, volleyball and soccer are predisposed. Self-reported outcome instruments have been used by clinicians to assess the treatment interventions effectiveness directed at patients with pathologies and identify impairments, disabilities and quality of life. The assessment of musculoskeletal injuries can be problem without clinical, radiological examination and on scores from patient-based questionnaires. The information from these questionnaires provides us good evidence if there is not interpretation of obtained scores. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is a self-reported outcome instrument for patients with foot and ankle disorders available in English, German, and French. The FAAM has a sports subscale and activity of daily living (ADL) subscale that can assess the activities that requires higher level. The aim of this study is to translate the FAAM into Turkish language, perform a cross-cultural adaptation, and investigate the reliability, validity of the translated version in athletic population

Conditions

Ankle; Injury, Superficial, Multiple (With Foot)

Keywords

Self-reported outcome instrument; Sport; Ankle and foot; Injury

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• FAAM-T questionnaire

  The FAAM-T is comprised of separately scored 21-item Activity of Daily Living (ADL) and 8-item Sports subscales. Each item is scored on a five-point Likert scale from 4 to 0, item score totals can be varied from 0 to 84 for the ADL and from 0 to 32 for the sports subscale. The percentage scores calculated with the total score of each subscale is divided by the highest potential score and multiplied by 100.

  3 days

Secondary Outcomes (3)

• Visual Analogue Scale

  3 days

• 6 meters shuttle run

  3 days

• Triple forward hop

  3 days

Study Arms (1)

professional athletes

athlete who volunteered in this study that should be a member of a professional sport team, All athletes must complete self reported outcome instrument (FAAM-T)

Other: Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Turkish version (FAAM-T) questionnaire

Interventions

Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Turkish version (FAAM-T) questionnaire OTHER

Self reported outcome instrument

professional athletes

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 40 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The professional Turkish-speaking athletes who foot and ankle disorders participate in this study.

You may qualify if:

• Participants should be professional athletes
• Age ranges must be 18-40 years old
• Clinical diagnosis of ankle and foot injury
• Acute condition
• Chronic condition
• Injuries must to happened in sport activities.

You may not qualify if:

• If athletes had injuries to hip, knee, lower leg within the previous 6 months before the study.
• The history of surgery to the above-mentioned areas.
• Coexisting musculoskeletal injuries in other body parts, or chronic conditions.
• Systematic diseases
• Neurological or vascular conditions.
• Alcohol abuse
• Psychiatric disorders

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Serkan Usgu: lead

Study Sites (1)

Hasan Kalyoncu University

Gaziantep, Şahinbey, 27410, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (14)

• Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Li GZ, Ruiz Munoz M, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Foot and ankle ability measure to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders: a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Oct;39(21):2182-2189. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1219772. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

  PMID: 27597231 BACKGROUND

• Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Nov;26(11):968-83. doi: 10.1177/107110070502601113.

  PMID: 16309613 RESULT

• Carcia CR, Martin RL, Drouin JM. Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in athletes with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):179-83. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.179.

  PMID: 18345343 RESULT

• Borloz S, Crevoisier X, Deriaz O, Ballabeni P, Martin RL, Luthi F. Evidence for validity and reliability of a French version of the FAAM. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Feb 8;12:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-40.

  PMID: 21303520 RESULT

• Moreira TS, Magalhaes Lde C, Silva RD, Martin RL, Resende MA. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Brazilian version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Dec;38(25):2479-90. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1137979. Epub 2016 Feb 15.

  PMID: 26878102 RESULT

• Hoch JM, Legner JL, Lorete C, Hoch MC. The Validity of the Quick-FAAM in Patients Seeking Treatment for an Acute or Subacute Foot or Ankle Health Condition. J Sport Rehabil. 2017 May 1;26(3):jsr.2016-0089. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2016-0089. Epub 2016 Sep 16.

  PMID: 27633016 RESULT

• Arunakul M, Arunakul P, Suesiritumrong C, Angthong C, Chernchujit B. Validity and Reliability of Thai Version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Subjective Form. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jun;98(6):561-7.

  PMID: 26219160 RESULT

• Weel H, Zwiers R, Azim D, Sierevelt IN, Haverkamp D, van Dijk CN, Kerkhoffs GM. Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):1348-54. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3480-9. Epub 2014 Dec 25.

  PMID: 25536950 RESULT

• Uematsu D, Suzuki H, Sasaki S, Nagano Y, Shinozuka N, Sunagawa N, Fukubayashi T. Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the foot and ankle ability measure. J Athl Train. 2015 Jan;50(1):65-70. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.42. Epub 2014 Oct 13.

  PMID: 25310247 RESULT

• Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Bravini E, Bargeri S, Moroso M, Plebani G, Ferriero G. [Foot and ankle ability measure: cross-cultural translation and validation of the Italian version of the ADL module (FAAM-I/ADL)]. Med Lav. 2014 Jul 15;105(5):357-65. Italian.

  PMID: 25134631 RESULT

• Donahue M, Simon J, Docherty CL. Critical review of self-reported functional ankle instability measures. Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Dec;32(12):1140-6. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.1140.

  PMID: 22381198 RESULT

• Martin RL, Irrgang JJ. A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Feb;37(2):72-84. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2403.

  PMID: 17366962 RESULT

• Arnold BL, Wright CJ, Ross SE. Functional ankle instability and health-related quality of life. J Athl Train. 2011 Nov-Dec;46(6):634-41. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.6.634.

  PMID: 22488189 RESULT

• Hoch JM, Druvenga B, Ferguson BA, Houston MN, Hoch MC. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Male and Female Collegiate Soccer Players During an Athletic Season. J Athl Train. 2015 Sep;50(9):930-6. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-50.5.03. Epub 2015 Jul 24.

  PMID: 26207439 RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wounds and Injuries

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data Collection; Epidemiologic Methods; Investigative Techniques; Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms; Quality of Health Care; Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation; Public Health; Environment and Public Health

Study Officials

• Serkan Usgu, PhD

  Hasan Kalyoncu University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

• Yavuz Yakut, Prof

  Hasan Kalyoncu University

  STUDY CHAIR

• Sıdıka Fatma Uygur, Prof

  Cyprus International University

  STUDY DIRECTOR

• Gunseli Usgu, PhD

  Hasan Kalyoncu University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: CASE CROSSOVER
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Assistant Professor of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 14, 2017
• First Posted: August 24, 2017
• Study Start: August 20, 2009
• Primary Completion: May 20, 2014
• Study Completion: July 12, 2015
• Last Updated: August 24, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-08

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will share
• Shared Documents: STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
• Time Frame: 6 months after publication

Locations

TU (1)