Effect of Non-nutritive Sweeteners of High Sugar Sweetened Beverages on Metabolic Health and Gut Microbiome
Effect of Free Sugar Replacement With Non-nutritive Sweeteners on Metabolic Health of High Sugar Sweetened Beverages Consumers: Potential Role of the Gut Microbiome
1 other identifier
interventional
41
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Increasing evidence suggest that artificial sweeteners such as saccharin, aspartame and sucralose may not be as metabolically safe as they first appeared, and it has been proposed that their consumption may be linked to important disturbances in the gut microbiome. Some in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that the recently approved sugar substitute Stevia (eg. steviol glycosides) can also influence intestinal homeostasis. However, it is not clear whether this natural non-nutritive sweetener (NNS) could also cause metabolic and microbiome disturbances as proposed for their synthetic counterparts. In fact, steviol glycosides may even have a beneficial impact on glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism possibly through a positive action on intestinal health and gut microbiome, but this has yet to be experimentally tested in a rigorous study. The main objective of this project is to evaluate whether steviol glycosides sweetened beverages (SGSB) or aspartame/acesulfame K sweetened beverages (AASB) exert beneficial, neutral or detrimental effects on metabolic health of regular consumers of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), and whether modulation of the gut microbiome is involved in the resulting impact of these NNSs on metabolic health. As chronic overconsumption of SSBs is clearly associated with an increased cardiometabolic risk, this study will be the first to determine the metabolic impact of replacing SSBs by potentially "healthier alternatives" such as the increasingly popular stevia-based soft drinks and aspartame-based soft drinks. The investigators will further investigate whether these NNS can cause pernicious effects on intestinal health and the gut microbiome. It is a crucial concern since the importance of this unsuspected key "organ" has been ignored for too long and its important implication in many chronic societal diseases has just been discovered. Results of this study could have a direct influence on health, nutrition and even agricultural policies as well as dietary guidelines around the world. This project is also critically important as an increasing amount of health professionals such as physicians, nurses and registered dietitians seek to provide evidenced-based guidance to individuals looking for healthier alternatives to SSBs including stevia-based or aspartame-based soft drinks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 21, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 24, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 18, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedDecember 26, 2025
December 1, 2025
4.2 years
August 21, 2017
December 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in metabolic syndrome parameters including insulin/glucose homeostasis and lipid/lipoprotein metabolism in sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) consumers following regular, diet or stevia-sweetened beverages intakes for 10 weeks.
18-24 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Changes in intestinal homeostasis of SSB consumers following regular, diet or stevia-sweetened beverages intakes for 10 weeks.
4-6 months
Changes in gut microbiota composition of SSB consumers following regular, diet or stevia-sweetened beverages intakes for 10 weeks.
4-6 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Changes in key molecular signaling pathways and metabolic regulatory networks identified through transcriptomics and metabolomics of SSB consumers following regular, diet or stevia-sweetened beverages intakes for 10 weeks.
6-12 months
Study Arms (3)
Regular beverages
ACTIVE COMPARATORSugar sweetened soft drinks
Diet beverages
EXPERIMENTALSoft drinks sweetened with artificial non-nutritive sweeteners (i.e. aspartame, acesulfame-K)
Stevia beverages
EXPERIMENTALSoft drinks sweetened with natural non-nutritive sweeteners (i.e. steviol glycosides)
Interventions
Subjects will consume regular soft drinks to test if there is a significant difference on the impact on gut microbiota composition and metabolic syndrome parameters between this treatment and the active treatments (diet and stevia beverages).
Subjects will consume diet soft drinks during 10 weeks to test the possible effects of aspartame/acesulfame-K sweetened beverages on gut microbiota composition and on metabolic syndrome parameters.
Subjects will consume soft drinks containing stevia during 10 weeks to test the possible effects of steviol glycosides sweetened beverages on gut microbiota composition and on metabolic syndrome parameters.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women in good health
- Soft drinks consumers (between 4 cans/week to 4 cans/day)
You may not qualify if:
- Metabolic disorders (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia)
- Daily consumption of more than 4 cans of soft drinks
- Regular use of medication affecting study parameters
- Change of medication (type or dose) in the last year
- Use of antibiotics in the last 3 months
- Change in natural health product use in the last 3 months
- More than 2 alcohol drinks par day
- Weight change of more than 5% in the last 3 months
- Surgery in the last 3 months or planed during the study
- Allergy or intolerance for products contained in soft drinks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Laval Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Laval University
Québec, G1V0A6, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Bergwall S, Johansson A, Sonestedt E, Acosta S. High versus low-added sugar consumption for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 5;1(1):CD013320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013320.pub2.
PMID: 34986271DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marie-Claude Vohl
Laval University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2017
First Posted
August 24, 2017
Study Start
October 18, 2017
Primary Completion
December 20, 2021
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
December 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12