NCT03259685

Brief Summary

Increasing evidence suggest that artificial sweeteners such as saccharin, aspartame and sucralose may not be as metabolically safe as they first appeared, and it has been proposed that their consumption may be linked to important disturbances in the gut microbiome. Some in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that the recently approved sugar substitute Stevia (eg. steviol glycosides) can also influence intestinal homeostasis. However, it is not clear whether this natural non-nutritive sweetener (NNS) could also cause metabolic and microbiome disturbances as proposed for their synthetic counterparts. In fact, steviol glycosides may even have a beneficial impact on glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism possibly through a positive action on intestinal health and gut microbiome, but this has yet to be experimentally tested in a rigorous study. The main objective of this project is to evaluate whether steviol glycosides sweetened beverages (SGSB) or aspartame/acesulfame K sweetened beverages (AASB) exert beneficial, neutral or detrimental effects on metabolic health of regular consumers of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), and whether modulation of the gut microbiome is involved in the resulting impact of these NNSs on metabolic health. As chronic overconsumption of SSBs is clearly associated with an increased cardiometabolic risk, this study will be the first to determine the metabolic impact of replacing SSBs by potentially "healthier alternatives" such as the increasingly popular stevia-based soft drinks and aspartame-based soft drinks. The investigators will further investigate whether these NNS can cause pernicious effects on intestinal health and the gut microbiome. It is a crucial concern since the importance of this unsuspected key "organ" has been ignored for too long and its important implication in many chronic societal diseases has just been discovered. Results of this study could have a direct influence on health, nutrition and even agricultural policies as well as dietary guidelines around the world. This project is also critically important as an increasing amount of health professionals such as physicians, nurses and registered dietitians seek to provide evidenced-based guidance to individuals looking for healthier alternatives to SSBs including stevia-based or aspartame-based soft drinks.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
41

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 21, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 24, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 18, 2017

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2021

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 26, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.2 years

First QC Date

August 21, 2017

Last Update Submit

December 19, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Non-nutritive sweetenersHigh Sugar Sweetened BeveragesDiet

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in metabolic syndrome parameters including insulin/glucose homeostasis and lipid/lipoprotein metabolism in sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) consumers following regular, diet or stevia-sweetened beverages intakes for 10 weeks.

    18-24 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Changes in intestinal homeostasis of SSB consumers following regular, diet or stevia-sweetened beverages intakes for 10 weeks.

    4-6 months

  • Changes in gut microbiota composition of SSB consumers following regular, diet or stevia-sweetened beverages intakes for 10 weeks.

    4-6 months

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in key molecular signaling pathways and metabolic regulatory networks identified through transcriptomics and metabolomics of SSB consumers following regular, diet or stevia-sweetened beverages intakes for 10 weeks.

    6-12 months

Study Arms (3)

Regular beverages

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Sugar sweetened soft drinks

Other: 710 ml of regular soft drinks, taken daily for 10 weeks

Diet beverages

EXPERIMENTAL

Soft drinks sweetened with artificial non-nutritive sweeteners (i.e. aspartame, acesulfame-K)

Other: 710 ml of diet soft drinks, taken daily for 10 weeks

Stevia beverages

EXPERIMENTAL

Soft drinks sweetened with natural non-nutritive sweeteners (i.e. steviol glycosides)

Other: 710 ml of stevia-sweetened soft drinks, taken daily for 10 weeks

Interventions

Subjects will consume regular soft drinks to test if there is a significant difference on the impact on gut microbiota composition and metabolic syndrome parameters between this treatment and the active treatments (diet and stevia beverages).

Regular beverages

Subjects will consume diet soft drinks during 10 weeks to test the possible effects of aspartame/acesulfame-K sweetened beverages on gut microbiota composition and on metabolic syndrome parameters.

Diet beverages

Subjects will consume soft drinks containing stevia during 10 weeks to test the possible effects of steviol glycosides sweetened beverages on gut microbiota composition and on metabolic syndrome parameters.

Stevia beverages

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men and women in good health
  • Soft drinks consumers (between 4 cans/week to 4 cans/day)

You may not qualify if:

  • Metabolic disorders (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia)
  • Daily consumption of more than 4 cans of soft drinks
  • Regular use of medication affecting study parameters
  • Change of medication (type or dose) in the last year
  • Use of antibiotics in the last 3 months
  • Change in natural health product use in the last 3 months
  • More than 2 alcohol drinks par day
  • Weight change of more than 5% in the last 3 months
  • Surgery in the last 3 months or planed during the study
  • Allergy or intolerance for products contained in soft drinks

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Laval University

Québec, G1V0A6, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bergwall S, Johansson A, Sonestedt E, Acosta S. High versus low-added sugar consumption for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 5;1(1):CD013320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013320.pub2.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Metabolic Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Insulin ResistanceHyperinsulinismGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Marie-Claude Vohl

    Laval University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2017

First Posted

August 24, 2017

Study Start

October 18, 2017

Primary Completion

December 20, 2021

Study Completion

December 1, 2025

Last Updated

December 26, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations