A Sputum Screening Test to Rule-out Pneumonia at an Early Stage
self-test
1 other identifier
observational
467
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In patients with clinical symptoms of respiratory infection, rapid identification of cases requiring antibiotic therapy is crucial to avoid development of multiple resistant bacteria. Identification of local acute-phase reactants can help assess the host's response to bacterial infection at the injury site. Here, the investigators developed an affordable, stable, feasible, and accurate diagnostic tool based on a locally produced protein with specific binding affinity to polysaccharides. The investigators further evaluated the ability of the novel test strip to rule out pneumonia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2015
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 5, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 16, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2017
CompletedAugust 22, 2017
August 1, 2017
3 months
August 16, 2017
August 19, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Negative predictive value to rule-out pneumonia
The sputum samples were collected randomly without knowledge about the patient or the ultimate diagnosis. The diagnoses were established first after the patient was dismissed from the clinic. RESPIRATORY INFECTION Pneumonia The following criteria were used to define pneumonia diagnosis 1. Clinical signs and symptoms 2. Changes detected by recent chest radiography 3. Received antibiotic therapy, irrespective previous antibiotic consumption. 4. The ultimate diagnosis J13-J18-J690 (ICD-10). Community-acquired pneumonia: The patients without previous respiratory disease. Hospital acquired (Nosocomial) pneumonia: Patients (n=11) acquired pneumonia at the hospital at least 48-72 hours after being admitted.
Within two years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Correlation to HGF and S100A8-A9 (Calprotectin) concentration (Elisa) in sputum
The samples were kept frozen after sampling -20 C and then thawed after 4 months and analyse was performed within 1 day.
Correlation to binding affinity to the parts of HGF molecule by Surface plasmon resonance
in 47 samples paired Elisa and SPR analysis was performed on samples kept in -20 C within 4 months after sampling..
Other Outcomes (1)
The management routine for pneumonia at Infectious clinic in Linkoeping in last decades
The data was obtained from paper journals from patients that were admitted (December to March) to the Department of Infectious diseases in Linköping in 1970,1980 and1990
Study Arms (1)
Fresh left-over sputum
All fresh sputum samples that were sent to the Department of Microbiology between November 1 2015 and January 30 2016 under the standard requirements for sputum cultures at the accredited (ISO 17025 and 15189 beginning in 1993) laboratory were kept cold (4-8 ͦC) after analysis by microscope and cultures until it was collected and coded by the study nurse in the evening (left-over samples).
Interventions
Totally 467 samples were gathered from different clinics, and the diagnostic procedures and the therapeutic approaches were completely unknown to the study group. The coded samples were stored at 4-8°C and analyzed within 72 hours of sampling using the sputum strip test. From April to June 2016, a physician and the study nurse reviewed the journals. The age, sex, length of stay on ward, the clinical symptoms, the blood and sputum cultures and PCR along with the results, the X-rays, the antibiotic therapy, CRB-65 and the ultimate diagnosis code (ICD-10) were documented in Excel-files.
Eligibility Criteria
All cases that searched the open Health care specialist facility at Linkoeping University hospital or were admitted to the ward at different clinics at the University Hospital in Linkoeping between 1st November 2015 to 30th January 2016 due to suspected respiratory infection and sputum samples were collected to be cultured at the Department of Microbiology University Hospital in Linkoeping.
You may qualify if:
- Sputum samples collected for routine diagnostic and reached the laboratory within 12 hours after Collection and considered as representative by microscopy and kept 4-8 C after Culture.
You may not qualify if:
- Samples not collected as above
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Linkoepinglead
- Linkoeping Universitycollaborator
- PEAS Institutcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Infectious Diseases
Linköping, Östergotland, 58185, Sweden
Biospecimen
Sputum samples from all included cases are kept frozen -70 C coded.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD, MD, associated professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 16, 2017
First Posted
August 22, 2017
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion
February 5, 2016
Study Completion
April 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 22, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- The data is available and awaiting the URL address to be defined.
Information regarding the samples that were included in statistic calculations, excluded cases with infection, pneumonia 1970-1980-1990, the actual cost of tests performed at our centre for diagnosis of pneumonia and the volunteers joining the feasibility test in Tables A-L