Clinical Study of Depo Provera Comparing Lay Health Workers and Clinically-trained Health Workers
'A Randomized Controlled Trial of Safety and Effectiveness of Depo Provera Intramuscular and Subcutaneous Administration Comparing Lay Lady Health Workers With Clinically-trained Family Welfare Workers in Pakistan
1 other identifier
interventional
460
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a randomized controlled trial comparing lay Lady Health Workers (Lay Health Workers) with Family Welfare Workers (Clinically- trained Health Workers) on quantitative measures of safety and effectiveness of Depo Provera and Sayana Press provision in a clinic setting. This comparative trial will test the non-inferiority hypothesis that Lady Health Workers are just as competent as clinically-trained Family Welfare Workers in screening and counseling first-time injectable users. These first time users will also be randomly assigned to receive intramuscular or subcutaneous injections of DMPA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for early_phase_1
Started Mar 2018
Shorter than P25 for early_phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 15, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 23, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 13, 2021
CompletedApril 13, 2021
March 1, 2021
4 months
July 19, 2017
June 27, 2019
March 18, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants That Were Appropriately Screened for Contraceptive Use
Number of participants that were appropriately screened for injectable contraceptive use in both rural and urban settings in Pakistan.
3 months from randomization
Number of Participants That Were Appropriately Counseled for DMPA Use.
Number of participants that were appropriately counseled by both types of providers in both urban and rural settings.
3 months from randomization
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Proportion of Clients Providers Who Report Satisfaction With the DMPA Method Received From the Provider
3 months from randomization
Proportion of Clients Who Report Satisfaction With Provider Services
3 months from randomization
Study Arms (4)
Clinic Provider - Urban
ACTIVE COMPARATORUrban Clinic Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press
Lay Provider - Urban
ACTIVE COMPARATORUrban Lay Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press
Clinic Provider- Rural
ACTIVE COMPARATORRural Clinic Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press
Lay Provider- Rural
ACTIVE COMPARATORRural Lay Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press
Interventions
The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use DMPA.
The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use Sayana Press
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women who voluntarily accept DMPA
You may not qualify if:
- Women unable to provide informed consent
- Women with contraindications to DMPA
- Women who are pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- FHI 360lead
- Aga Khan Universitycollaborator
- Jhpiegocollaborator
- United States Agency for International Development (USAID)collaborator
- Population Welfare Department, Government of Sindh, Pakistancollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Aga Khan University
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mario Chen
- Organization
- FHI 360
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dawn S Chin-Quee, PhD, MPH
FHI 360
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2017
First Posted
August 21, 2017
Study Start
March 19, 2018
Primary Completion
July 15, 2018
Study Completion
July 23, 2018
Last Updated
April 13, 2021
Results First Posted
April 13, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share