BONDING TO ENAMEL USING A UNIVERSAL ADHESIVE
RCT
STRATEGIES FOR BONDING TO ENAMEL USING A UNIVERSAL ADHESIVE ON SELF-ETCHING MODE
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective: This double-blind randomized clinical trial evaluates strategies for improving the bonding of universal adhesive to enamel in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) of a new universal multi-mode adhesive (Ambar Universal; FGM). Methods: A total of 134 restorations were randomly placed in 19 patients according to the following groups: SE - Self-etch; SEE - Selective etching; SE2X - Self-etch doble time; SE1+ - Self-etch additional layer. The resin composite Opallis (FGM) was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated after one week (baseline), 6 and 12 months, using the FDI and USPHS criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using appropriate tests (=0.05).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Feb 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 18, 2017
CompletedAugust 29, 2017
August 1, 2017
1.5 years
August 15, 2017
August 27, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Retention
The primary clinical endpoint was restoration retention/fracture.
6 montths
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Marginal Adaptation
6 months
Study Arms (4)
1-step self-etch approach (SE)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAccording to the manufacturer's instructions.
selective enamel etching (SEE)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAccording to the manufacturer's instructions.
1-step self-etch for double time (SE2X)
EXPERIMENTALAccording to the manufacturer's instructions, but for the double time (20 s) in the each application.
1-step self-etch additional layer (SE1+)
EXPERIMENTALAccording to the manufacturer's instructions, but apply tree times.
Interventions
Application mode - Do not use etchan. According to the manufacturer's instructions.
Application mode - Etch only on enamel for 15 s. Rinse for 15s. Air dry to remove excess water.According to the manufacturer's instructions.
Application mode - Do not use etchan. According to the manufacturer's instructions, but for the double time (20 s) in the each application.
Application mode - Do not use etchan. According to the manufacturer's instructions, but apply tree times.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants had to be in good general health.
- At least 18 years old
- Have an acceptable oral hygiene level
- Present at least 20 teeth under occlusion
- At least four NCCLs in four different teeth
- These lesions had to be non-carious, non-retentive, deeper than 1 mm, and involve both the enamel and dentin of vital teeth without mobility.
- The cavo-surface margin could not involve more than 50% of enamel, and all lesions had cervical margins ending in dentin.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants had not be in good general health.
- At less 18 years old
- Have not an acceptable oral hygiene level
- Present at less 20 teeth under occlusion
- At less four NCCLs in four different teeth, these lesions had not be non-carious, retentive and involve only enamel of vital teeth with mobility.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Cascavel, Paraná, 85819-110, Brazil
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Rafael Scheffer, Master
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- staff member not involved in the research protocol performed the randomization process with computer-generated tables. Details of the allocated groups were recorded on cards contained in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Opening the envelope only on the day of the restorative procedure guaranteed the concealment of the random sequence. The examiners were not involved with the restoration procedures and therefore blinded to the group assignment, performed the clinical evaluation. Patient were also blinded to group assignment in a double-blind randomized clinical trial design.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2017
First Posted
August 18, 2017
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
August 1, 2017
Study Completion
August 1, 2017
Last Updated
August 29, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08