NCT03254290

Brief Summary

This randomized control study will use 15 pediatric subjects selected from the patient population in the pediatric dental clinic at Children's Medical Center Dental Clinic (CMC Dental Clinic). The study will use a within-subject control design whereby one tooth will be treated with a pulpotomy using the new formulation of MTA (NeoMTA Plus, Avalon Biomed Inc., Bradenton, FL, USA) and restored with a multi-surface composite, and the other tooth with a formocresol pulpotomy and restored with a multi-surface composite; thus, approximately 15 teeth will be treated for each treatment group. The specific treated tooth will be randomized as to which side will receive the MTA or formocresol using sealed, opaque envelopes. Approximately 15 subjects will be needed for the study in order to elicit any significant findings as demonstrated by a power analysis.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2017

Shorter than P25 for early_phase_1

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 15, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 18, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2017

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 18, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

August 15, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 17, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Color stability

    color scale (0=white/still esthetic; 1=slightly gray; 2=medium gray color; 3=dark gray

    3 month recall

Study Arms (2)

Experimental NeoMTA

EXPERIMENTAL

The new formulation of MTA (does not contain bismuth oxide) will be used in one tooth receiving a pulpotomy to determine if the color of the tooth changes over time.The new formulation has received the FDAs 510(k) substantial equivalence clearance for Class II dental materials and is equivalent to its MTA predicate (ProRoot, Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK, USA).

Biological: NeoMTABiological: Formocresol

Formocresol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Control group. This group will receive the "gold standard" formulation of a formocresol pulpotomy.

Biological: Formocresol

Interventions

NeoMTABIOLOGICAL

A new formulation of MTA was developed in which bismuth oxide was omitted.

Experimental NeoMTA
FormocresolBIOLOGICAL

Control group

Experimental NeoMTAFormocresol

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Months - 9 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children between the ages of 2 ½ and 9 years of age and be ASA I or ASA II. Patient must have two, primary teeth that are matched for, size of carious lesion (same level of approximation of carious lesion to the pulp) and are that are treatment planned for a pulpotomy. The teeth selected for the study must be vital and asymptomatic both clinically and radiographically or only display symptoms consistent with reversible pulptitis The teeth selected for the study must be anticipated to be retained in the mouth for at least eighteen months

You may not qualify if:

  • Teeth with a history of spontaneous pain. Teeth with radiographic evidence of internal or external resorption, intraradicular or periapical bone loss, loss of lamina dura, or widening of the periodontal ligament space

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (19)

  • Agamy HA, Bakry NS, Mounir MM, Avery DR. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp-capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2004 Jul-Aug;26(4):302-9.

  • Farsi N, Alamoudi N, Balto K, Mushayt A. Success of mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005 Summer;29(4):307-11. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.29.4.n80t77w625118k73.

  • Holan G, Eidelman E, Fuks AB. Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol. Pediatr Dent. 2005 Mar-Apr;27(2):129-36.

  • Jabbarifar SE, Khademi D, Ghasemi D. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy versus mineral trioxide aggregate in human primary molar tooth. J Res Med Sci 2004; 9(6)L 55-8.

    RESULT
  • Peng L, Ye L, Tan H, Zhou X. Evaluation of the formocresol versus mineral trioxide aggregate primary molar pulpotomy: a meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Dec;102(6):e40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.05.017. Epub 2006 Sep 26.

  • Farooq NS, Coll JA, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;22(4):278-86.

  • Guelmann M, Fair J, Bimstein E. Permanent versus temporary restorations after emergency pulpotomies in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 2005 Nov-Dec;27(6):478-81.

  • Holan G, Fuks AB, Ketlz N. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalga. Pediatr Dent. 2002 May-Jun;24(3):212-6.

  • Seale NS. The use of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;24(5):501-5.

  • Caceda JH. The use of resin-based composite restorations in pulpotomized primary molars. J Dent Child (Chic). 2007 May-Aug;74(2):147-50.

  • Cehreli ZC, Cetinguc A, Cengiz SB, Altay AN. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results. Am J Dent. 2006 Oct;19(5):262-6.

  • Guelmann M, Bookmyer KL, Villalta P, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of restorative techniques for pulpotomized primary molars. J Dent Child (Chic). 2004 Sep-Dec;71(3):209-11.

  • Guelmann M, McIlwain MF, Primosch RE. Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials. Pediatr Dent. 2005 Jan-Feb;27(1):24-7.

  • Hutcheson C, Seale NS, McWhorter A, Kerins C, Wright J. Multi-surface composite vs stainless steel crown restorations after mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent. 2012 Nov-Dec;34(7):460-7.

  • Maroto M, Barberia E, Planells P, Garcia Godoy F. Dentin bridge formation after mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomies in primary teeth. Am J Dent. 2005 Jun;18(3):151-4.

  • Parirokh M, Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Stowe S, Eslami B, Eskandarizade A, Shabahang S. A comparative study of white and grey mineral trioxide aggregate as pulp capping agents in dog's teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2005 Jun;21(3):150-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2005.00311.x.

  • Holland R, de Souza V, Murata SS, Nery MJ, Bernabe PF, Otoboni Filho JA, Dezan Junior E. Healing process of dog dental pulp after pulpotomy and pulp covering with mineral trioxide aggregate or Portland cement. Braz Dent J. 2001;12(2):109-13.

  • Maroto M, Barberia E, Vera V, Garcia-Godoy F. Dentin bridge formation after white mineral trioxide aggregate (white MTA) pulpotomies in primary molars. Am J Dent. 2006 Apr;19(2):75-9.

  • Walsh RM, Woodmansey KF, Glickman GN, He J. Evaluation of compressive strength of hydraulic silicate-based root-end filling materials. J Endod. 2014 Jul;40(7):969-72. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.11.018. Epub 2014 Jan 14.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Interventions

formocresol

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The teeth treated with each specific material will be randomly assigned by drawing a random number from a manilla folder
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Children between the ages of 2 ½ and 9 years of age and be ASA I or ASA II. Patient must have two, primary teeth that are matched for, size of carious lesion (same level of approximation of carious lesion to the pulp) and are that are treatment planned for a pulpotomy. The teeth selected for the study must be vital and asymptomatic both clinically and radiographically or only display symptoms consistent with reversible pulptitis The teeth selected for the study must be anticipated to be retained in the mouth for at least eighteen months
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2017

First Posted

August 18, 2017

Study Start

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion

June 30, 2018

Study Completion

June 30, 2018

Last Updated

August 18, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-08