Ruptured Aneurysms Treated With Hydrogel Coils
RAGE
1 other identifier
observational
1,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine safety and occlusion rates when second-generation hydrogel coils are used in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 17, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 27, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 23, 2024
July 1, 2024
7.5 years
August 9, 2017
July 19, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Death or major stroke
30 days
Major ipsilateral stroke, neurological death, or rebleeding from the target aneurysm
18 months
Adequate angiographic occlusion (as defined by the Raymond Roy Occlusion Classification) without interim retreatment secondary to aneurysm recurrence or rebleed of the target aneurysm
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Rebleed rate of the target aneurysm
30 days
Rebleed rate of the target aneurysm
18 months
Modified Rankin Score (mRS)
18 months
Modified Rankin Score (mRS)
30 days
Packing density measured by volumetric filling of the aneurysm
Immediately following procedure
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Subjects with ruptured aneurysms
Interventions
Hydrogel coils 90% by length
Eligibility Criteria
Patients aged 18 - 80 years with a ruptured saccular intracranial aneurysm in whom coil embolization is determined to be the appropriate treatment strategy.
You may qualify if:
- Patient is ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years of age.
- Patient has a previously untreated, ruptured saccular intracranial aneurysm 2 - 15 mm in diameter for which the clinical decision to treat with hydrogel coil embolization has been made independent of the decision to participate in the study described in this protocol.
- Patient has a baseline Hunt and Hess Score of I, II, or III.
- Patient or patient's legally authorized representative has provided written informed consent.
- Patient must be considered by the treating physician to be available for and able to complete all followup visits.
- Patient has not been previously entered into this study.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to obtain written informed consent.
- Patient is \< 18 or \> 80 years of age.
- Patient has a baseline Hunt and Hess score of IV or V.
- Target aneurysm is dissecting, fusiform, mycotic, blister-like, tumoral, or AVM-related.
- Target aneurysm maximum diameter is \> 15 mm or \< 2 mm.
- Target aneurysm was previously treated via clipping or coiling.
- Target aneurysm is deemed by the treating physician to be unsuitable for coiling or unlikely to be successfully treated by endovascular techniques.
- Target aneurysm has not been confidently determined by the treating physician to be the source of SAH.
- Planned use of a flow diverter or intrasaccular device as a component of the target aneurysm treatment plan.
- Intended use of a coil-assist stent as a component of the target aneurysm treatment plan, unless use of a stent is 1) planned as a subsequent stage of a staged coiling procedure or 2) used for bailout purposes.
- Patient has a known, untreatable hypersensitivity to contrast dye, iodine, hydrogel, or any other component of the treatment device.
- Patient has a contraindication to heparin or aspirin.
- Patient has vascular anatomy/tortuosity preventing access to the target aneurysm.
- Patient is unable to undergo DSA or DSA is determined unsuitable or outside standard of care by the treating physician.
- Patient has a serious or life-threatening comorbidity that could confound study results.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Microvention-Terumo, Inc.lead
- Semmes-Murphey Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Methodist University Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, 38120, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adam S Arthur, MD, MPH, FACS
Semmes-Murphey Clinic
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Fiorella, MD, PhD
Stony Brook Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2017
First Posted
August 17, 2017
Study Start
November 27, 2017
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 23, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07