NCT03245593

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesize that implementation of a shared decision making care plan for prophylactic treatment will help therapeutic adherence of bipolar patients. They also anticipate that patients treated according to a shared decision making plan will have an elevated satisfaction of their care, quality of life and functionment, as well as a lower number of relapses

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

16 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 7, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 10, 2017

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 24, 2018

Completed
7.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 18, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7.6 years

First QC Date

August 7, 2017

Last Update Submit

December 11, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Measure the difference of prophylactic treatment compliance between bipolar patients receiving treatment according to standard care versus a shared decision making care plan following a mood episode.

    Clinician Rating Scale (1-7)

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (80)

  • Study the clinician-reported difference between the 2 groups in medication adherence

    3 months

  • Study the clinician-reported difference between the 2 groups in medication adherence

    6 months

  • Study the clinician-reported difference between the 2 groups in medication adherence

    9 months

  • Study the self-reported difference between the 2 groups in medication adherence

    3 months

  • Study the self-reported difference between the 2 groups in medication adherence

    6 months

  • +75 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Shared Decision making for care

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Shared-decision making process

Standard decision making for care

OTHER
Other: standard care

Interventions

Completion of the Ottawa Personal Decision Guide to help guide care with the support of online and printed material describing the therapeutic options available

Shared Decision making for care

Care of patients according to standard practice of managing patients with bipolar disorder

Standard decision making for care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
  • The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The patient must be available for the 12 months of follow-up
  • The patient is at least 18 years old
  • Patients is suffering from bipolar disorder (I or II) according to DSM-5 criteria
  • Following resolution of a mood episode (manic or depressive according to DSM-5 criteria) according to the criteria of l'International Society for Bipolar Disorder (Recovery, clinical remission of at least 4 weeks)
  • Followed by at least one of the practitioner belonging to one of the participating centers
  • Without comprehension problems of fluent French

You may not qualify if:

  • The subject is participating in an interventional study, or has participated in another interventional study within the previous 3 months
  • The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
  • It is impossible to give the subject informed information, or the subject refuses to sign the consent
  • The subject has already participated in this study
  • The patient has troubles linked to the usage of severe intensive substances (such as those defined by the DMS-5)
  • The patient has a revision of the initial diagnosis of bipolar disorder

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (16)

Ch Beziers

Béziers, 34500, France

Location

CH Charles Perrens

Bordeaux, 33076, France

Location

CH le Vinatier

Bron, 69678, France

Location

CHU de Clermont Ferrand - Hôpital Gabriel-Montpied

Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France

Location

Chu Gabriel Montpied Clermont Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France

Location

CH Sainte-Marie de Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, 63037, France

Location

APHP - Centre Hospitalier Henri Mondor

Créteil, 94010, France

Location

CHU de Grenoble - Hôpital Albert Michallon

Grenoble, 38043, France

Location

CH Limoges

Limoges, 87025, France

Location

APHM - Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite

Marseille, 13274, France

Location

CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Lapeyronie

Montpellier, 34295, France

Location

CHU Nancy

Nancy, 54000, France

Location

CHU Nantes

Nantes, 44000, France

Location

Clinique des troubles thymiques

Nîmes, 30000, France

Location

CHU Nimes

Nîmes, 30029, France

Location

APHP - Hôpital Saint Louis-Lariboisière-Fernand-Widal

Paris, 75475, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Samalin L, Honciuc M, Boyer L, de Chazeron I, Blanc O, Abbar M, Llorca PM. Efficacy of shared decision-making on treatment adherence of patients with bipolar disorder: a cluster randomized trial (ShareD-BD). BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 13;18(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1686-y.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Disorder

Interventions

Standard of Care

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bipolar and Related DisordersMood DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Quality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Study Officials

  • Ludovic Samalin

    University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2017

First Posted

August 10, 2017

Study Start

April 24, 2018

Primary Completion

December 1, 2025

Study Completion

December 1, 2025

Last Updated

December 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Locations